Aug 12, 2014
Former Jimmy John's workers last week filed a class action lawsuit in federal court charging that the sandwich chain famed for "dirt cheap" prices is stealing workers' wages as a matter of nation-wide policy.
Karolis Kubelskas and Emily Brunner, both former workers at separate Jimmy John's shops in Illinois, charge that their employers violated numerous state and federal laws by "requiring hourly employees to work 'off the clock' without getting paid"--a practice that led to sub-minimum wages, denial of overtime pay, and therefore "significant monetary losses." They say that this practice, which affects "tens of thousands" of current and former workers, amounts to intentional "systematic wage theft."
Both Jimmy John's Enterprise and franchisee JS Fort Group--owner of the two Illinois locations that employed the plaintiffs--are named in the suit.
Jimmy John's, which boasts 1,900 shops across the United States, says it offers low prices and an "irreverent attitude" that college students love. But critics charge that the company's business model is, in fact, based on skimping on labor costs and denying workers their rights.
When 10 Jimmy John's shops in the Twin Cities launched a bid in 2010 to win formal union recognition, they were aggressively contested--and according to workers physically intimidated and threatened--by their employer, with Jimmy John's ultimately undermining their union recognition. Six key organizers in the drives later said they were unlawfully fired for organizing, and in 2012, a federal judge ruled in their favor.
At the time, the organizing drive was recognized as a "rare" attempt to organize fast food workers. But since then, public fast food worker organizing bids have taken off across the United States and world, including waves of fast food worker strikes.
The Jimmy John's Workers Union, an affiliate of the Industrial Workers of the World, was created during the 2010 organizing drive and is currently involved in numerous organizing efforts across the country, Isaac Dalto, Jimmy John's worker and IWW member, told Common Dreams. This includes Baltimore, Maryland where workers recently went public with their demands for a living wage, paid sick days, and union recognition.
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Sarah Lazare
Sarah Lazare was a staff writer for Common Dreams from 2013-2016. She is currently web editor and reporter for In These Times.
Former Jimmy John's workers last week filed a class action lawsuit in federal court charging that the sandwich chain famed for "dirt cheap" prices is stealing workers' wages as a matter of nation-wide policy.
Karolis Kubelskas and Emily Brunner, both former workers at separate Jimmy John's shops in Illinois, charge that their employers violated numerous state and federal laws by "requiring hourly employees to work 'off the clock' without getting paid"--a practice that led to sub-minimum wages, denial of overtime pay, and therefore "significant monetary losses." They say that this practice, which affects "tens of thousands" of current and former workers, amounts to intentional "systematic wage theft."
Both Jimmy John's Enterprise and franchisee JS Fort Group--owner of the two Illinois locations that employed the plaintiffs--are named in the suit.
Jimmy John's, which boasts 1,900 shops across the United States, says it offers low prices and an "irreverent attitude" that college students love. But critics charge that the company's business model is, in fact, based on skimping on labor costs and denying workers their rights.
When 10 Jimmy John's shops in the Twin Cities launched a bid in 2010 to win formal union recognition, they were aggressively contested--and according to workers physically intimidated and threatened--by their employer, with Jimmy John's ultimately undermining their union recognition. Six key organizers in the drives later said they were unlawfully fired for organizing, and in 2012, a federal judge ruled in their favor.
At the time, the organizing drive was recognized as a "rare" attempt to organize fast food workers. But since then, public fast food worker organizing bids have taken off across the United States and world, including waves of fast food worker strikes.
The Jimmy John's Workers Union, an affiliate of the Industrial Workers of the World, was created during the 2010 organizing drive and is currently involved in numerous organizing efforts across the country, Isaac Dalto, Jimmy John's worker and IWW member, told Common Dreams. This includes Baltimore, Maryland where workers recently went public with their demands for a living wage, paid sick days, and union recognition.
Sarah Lazare
Sarah Lazare was a staff writer for Common Dreams from 2013-2016. She is currently web editor and reporter for In These Times.
Former Jimmy John's workers last week filed a class action lawsuit in federal court charging that the sandwich chain famed for "dirt cheap" prices is stealing workers' wages as a matter of nation-wide policy.
Karolis Kubelskas and Emily Brunner, both former workers at separate Jimmy John's shops in Illinois, charge that their employers violated numerous state and federal laws by "requiring hourly employees to work 'off the clock' without getting paid"--a practice that led to sub-minimum wages, denial of overtime pay, and therefore "significant monetary losses." They say that this practice, which affects "tens of thousands" of current and former workers, amounts to intentional "systematic wage theft."
Both Jimmy John's Enterprise and franchisee JS Fort Group--owner of the two Illinois locations that employed the plaintiffs--are named in the suit.
Jimmy John's, which boasts 1,900 shops across the United States, says it offers low prices and an "irreverent attitude" that college students love. But critics charge that the company's business model is, in fact, based on skimping on labor costs and denying workers their rights.
When 10 Jimmy John's shops in the Twin Cities launched a bid in 2010 to win formal union recognition, they were aggressively contested--and according to workers physically intimidated and threatened--by their employer, with Jimmy John's ultimately undermining their union recognition. Six key organizers in the drives later said they were unlawfully fired for organizing, and in 2012, a federal judge ruled in their favor.
At the time, the organizing drive was recognized as a "rare" attempt to organize fast food workers. But since then, public fast food worker organizing bids have taken off across the United States and world, including waves of fast food worker strikes.
The Jimmy John's Workers Union, an affiliate of the Industrial Workers of the World, was created during the 2010 organizing drive and is currently involved in numerous organizing efforts across the country, Isaac Dalto, Jimmy John's worker and IWW member, told Common Dreams. This includes Baltimore, Maryland where workers recently went public with their demands for a living wage, paid sick days, and union recognition.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.