US Top Brass: Striking Syria Back on the Table
Defense Secretary Hagel and Gen. Dempsey indicate willingness to expand US war to Syria
At a press briefing at the Pentagon on Thursday, Chairman of the Joints Chiefs of Staff Army Gen. Martin Dempsey said his determination is that the only way to adequately defeat the ISIS militants in Iraq is by expanding military operations--including possible U.S. airstrikes--into neighboring Syria.
"Can [the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria] be defeated without addressing that part of the organization that resides in Syria?" Dempsey said to reporters. "The answer is no."
Dempsey was joined at the briefing by Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel who characterized the new military engagement in Iraq as an effort that was growing, not coming to an end. "We are pursuing a long-term strategy against [ISIS] because [ISIS] clearly poses a long-term threat," Hagel said. "The U.S. military's involvement is not over. President Obama has been very clear on this point."
Asked about the Obama adminstrations position on striking targets in Syria, Hagel responded: "We're looking at all options."
Despite the condemnation of the expanding bombing campaign now underway in Iraq, the idea of further escalation--including more boots on the ground or U.S. airstrikes inside Syria--raises deeper concerns over mission creep in the region as the U.S. leadership seems poised to elevate its activity on both sides of the Iraq/Syria border which Dempsey said is "at this point a nonexistent." The idea that the U.S. military would now expand bombing into Syria fulfills the fears of those who warned that once troops were introduced and strikes authorized in Iraq, the war footprint would predictably spread.
As many observers have pointed out, the irony of Obama's foreign policy regarding ISIS in the region is while the Syrian Army of Assad has been waging the most sustained battle against the Sunni militants in recent years, the U.S. remains committed to to Assad's ouster and has even lined up military support for opposition factions aligned against him. Asked about this dynamic during Thursday's press conference, both Hagel and Dempsey reiterated that they see Assas "as part of the problem" even as they skirted the complexity and possible hypocrisy of the U.S. position regarding the ongoing and bloody Syrian civil war. From the transcript:
Q: Talking about ISIL in Syria, my question is for -- both of you, Mr. Chairman and Mr. Secretary -- do you -- do you have any information that there is a link, a relation between the Assad regime and ISIL? As you may know, the Assad regime has been striking ISIL for the last few months. Do you see yourself on the same page with the -- with the Assad regime? And do you still believe that Assad is part of the problem or he might become part of the broader solution in the region?
SEC. HAGEL: Well, Assad is very much a central part of the problem. And I think it's well documented as to why. When you have the brutal dictatorship of Assad and what he has done to his own country, which perpetuated much of what is happening or has been happening in Syria, so he's part of the problem, and as much a part of it as probably the central core of it.
As to your question regarding ISIL and Assad, yes, they are fighting each other, as well as other terrorist groups, very sophisticated terrorist groups in -- in Syria.
GEN. DEMPSEY: He is absolutely part of the problem.
SEC. HAGEL: Kevin?
Asked about the threat of mission creep, Hagel responded: "The president has been very clear on mission creep. And he's made it very clear that he will not allow that."
We are at a crossroads
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. US voters have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. Our Fall Campaign is underway, and we need your help. To power our newsroom through the rest of the year, we need to raise $125,000 by midnight on October 31. So if you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
At a press briefing at the Pentagon on Thursday, Chairman of the Joints Chiefs of Staff Army Gen. Martin Dempsey said his determination is that the only way to adequately defeat the ISIS militants in Iraq is by expanding military operations--including possible U.S. airstrikes--into neighboring Syria.
"Can [the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria] be defeated without addressing that part of the organization that resides in Syria?" Dempsey said to reporters. "The answer is no."
Dempsey was joined at the briefing by Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel who characterized the new military engagement in Iraq as an effort that was growing, not coming to an end. "We are pursuing a long-term strategy against [ISIS] because [ISIS] clearly poses a long-term threat," Hagel said. "The U.S. military's involvement is not over. President Obama has been very clear on this point."
Asked about the Obama adminstrations position on striking targets in Syria, Hagel responded: "We're looking at all options."
Despite the condemnation of the expanding bombing campaign now underway in Iraq, the idea of further escalation--including more boots on the ground or U.S. airstrikes inside Syria--raises deeper concerns over mission creep in the region as the U.S. leadership seems poised to elevate its activity on both sides of the Iraq/Syria border which Dempsey said is "at this point a nonexistent." The idea that the U.S. military would now expand bombing into Syria fulfills the fears of those who warned that once troops were introduced and strikes authorized in Iraq, the war footprint would predictably spread.
As many observers have pointed out, the irony of Obama's foreign policy regarding ISIS in the region is while the Syrian Army of Assad has been waging the most sustained battle against the Sunni militants in recent years, the U.S. remains committed to to Assad's ouster and has even lined up military support for opposition factions aligned against him. Asked about this dynamic during Thursday's press conference, both Hagel and Dempsey reiterated that they see Assas "as part of the problem" even as they skirted the complexity and possible hypocrisy of the U.S. position regarding the ongoing and bloody Syrian civil war. From the transcript:
Q: Talking about ISIL in Syria, my question is for -- both of you, Mr. Chairman and Mr. Secretary -- do you -- do you have any information that there is a link, a relation between the Assad regime and ISIL? As you may know, the Assad regime has been striking ISIL for the last few months. Do you see yourself on the same page with the -- with the Assad regime? And do you still believe that Assad is part of the problem or he might become part of the broader solution in the region?
SEC. HAGEL: Well, Assad is very much a central part of the problem. And I think it's well documented as to why. When you have the brutal dictatorship of Assad and what he has done to his own country, which perpetuated much of what is happening or has been happening in Syria, so he's part of the problem, and as much a part of it as probably the central core of it.
As to your question regarding ISIL and Assad, yes, they are fighting each other, as well as other terrorist groups, very sophisticated terrorist groups in -- in Syria.
GEN. DEMPSEY: He is absolutely part of the problem.
SEC. HAGEL: Kevin?
Asked about the threat of mission creep, Hagel responded: "The president has been very clear on mission creep. And he's made it very clear that he will not allow that."
At a press briefing at the Pentagon on Thursday, Chairman of the Joints Chiefs of Staff Army Gen. Martin Dempsey said his determination is that the only way to adequately defeat the ISIS militants in Iraq is by expanding military operations--including possible U.S. airstrikes--into neighboring Syria.
"Can [the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria] be defeated without addressing that part of the organization that resides in Syria?" Dempsey said to reporters. "The answer is no."
Dempsey was joined at the briefing by Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel who characterized the new military engagement in Iraq as an effort that was growing, not coming to an end. "We are pursuing a long-term strategy against [ISIS] because [ISIS] clearly poses a long-term threat," Hagel said. "The U.S. military's involvement is not over. President Obama has been very clear on this point."
Asked about the Obama adminstrations position on striking targets in Syria, Hagel responded: "We're looking at all options."
Despite the condemnation of the expanding bombing campaign now underway in Iraq, the idea of further escalation--including more boots on the ground or U.S. airstrikes inside Syria--raises deeper concerns over mission creep in the region as the U.S. leadership seems poised to elevate its activity on both sides of the Iraq/Syria border which Dempsey said is "at this point a nonexistent." The idea that the U.S. military would now expand bombing into Syria fulfills the fears of those who warned that once troops were introduced and strikes authorized in Iraq, the war footprint would predictably spread.
As many observers have pointed out, the irony of Obama's foreign policy regarding ISIS in the region is while the Syrian Army of Assad has been waging the most sustained battle against the Sunni militants in recent years, the U.S. remains committed to to Assad's ouster and has even lined up military support for opposition factions aligned against him. Asked about this dynamic during Thursday's press conference, both Hagel and Dempsey reiterated that they see Assas "as part of the problem" even as they skirted the complexity and possible hypocrisy of the U.S. position regarding the ongoing and bloody Syrian civil war. From the transcript:
Q: Talking about ISIL in Syria, my question is for -- both of you, Mr. Chairman and Mr. Secretary -- do you -- do you have any information that there is a link, a relation between the Assad regime and ISIL? As you may know, the Assad regime has been striking ISIL for the last few months. Do you see yourself on the same page with the -- with the Assad regime? And do you still believe that Assad is part of the problem or he might become part of the broader solution in the region?
SEC. HAGEL: Well, Assad is very much a central part of the problem. And I think it's well documented as to why. When you have the brutal dictatorship of Assad and what he has done to his own country, which perpetuated much of what is happening or has been happening in Syria, so he's part of the problem, and as much a part of it as probably the central core of it.
As to your question regarding ISIL and Assad, yes, they are fighting each other, as well as other terrorist groups, very sophisticated terrorist groups in -- in Syria.
GEN. DEMPSEY: He is absolutely part of the problem.
SEC. HAGEL: Kevin?
Asked about the threat of mission creep, Hagel responded: "The president has been very clear on mission creep. And he's made it very clear that he will not allow that."