The Udall Amendment would be the 28th amendment to the U.S. Constitution. (Photo: Mr.TinDC)
Sep 05, 2014
The U.S. Senate is expected to vote Monday on a constitutional amendment that would effectively overturn the Supreme Court's decision in Citizens United. The bill, sponsored by Senator Tom Udall (D-New Mexico), "grants Congress and the states the power to regulate the raising and spending of money and in-kind equivalents with respect to federal and state elections, respectively."
"This is a historic moment," said Marge Baker, executive vice president at People For the American Way, which has been one of the leaders of the push for a constitutional amendment. "The Citizens United decision came just four and a half years ago, and now the Senate is about to vote on an amendment to overturn it. Americans are fed up with the staggering amounts of money flooding elections. With this level of public support for taking money out of politics, it's clear that this is just the beginning of the push for an amendment."
Because it would amend the U.S. Constitution, the proposal requires a two-thirds majority to pass. It would then have to pass in the House by the same majority and be ratified by three-fourths of the state legislatures. According to Public Citizen, 50 senators have indicated their support for the amendment.
A poll of 800 likely voters commissioned by Public Citizen and conducted by two polling firms, one Democratic and one Republican, recently found that by a 2-1 margin, voters provided with a short description of the amendment are in favor of it.
"It's time for Congress to act on the people's demand for a constitutional amendment to overturn Citizens United and restore our democracy," said Robert Weissman, president of Public Citizen, in a statement. "This poll shows that the public, including Republican voters, forcefully rejects arguments from Senator Mitch McConnell and Senator Ted Cruz in defense of the status quo."
McConnell, Cruz, and other Republican officials have claimed that constraints on campaign spending amount to an assault on free speech. Earlier this summer, ACLU leaders bolstered that argument, saying they opposed the Udall amendment on the grounds that it would "severely limit the First Amendment, lead directly to government censorship of political speech and result in a host of unintended consequences that would undermine the goals the amendment has been introduced to advance -- namely encouraging vigorous political dissent and providing voice to the voiceless, which we, of course, support."
But on Thursday, a group of former ACLU leaders struck back in a letter to several high-ranking senators. "While, as present and former leaders of the ACLU, we take no position in this letter on whether a constitutional amendment is the most appropriate way to pursue campaign finance reform," the letter reads, "we believe that the current leadership of the National ACLU has endorsed a deeply contested and incorrect reading of the First Amendment as a rigid deregulatory strait jacket that threatens the integrity of American democracy."
Organizations like Public Citizen, MoveOn, and People for the American Way are encouraging voters to contact their senators and urge them to support the amendment. In Portsmouth, New Hampshire on Thursday, a group of about 25 activists delivered a petition with 10,500 signatures to the office of U.S. Senator Kelly Ayotte (R-NH); similar actions took place across the country.
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. Join with us today! |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Deirdre Fulton
Deirdre Fulton is a former Common Dreams senior editor and staff writer. Previously she worked as an editor and writer for the Portland Phoenix and the Boston Phoenix, where she was honored by the New England Press Association and the Association of Alternative Newsweeklies. A Boston University graduate, Deirdre is a co-founder of the Maine-based Lorem Ipsum Theater Collective and the PortFringe theater festival. She writes young adult fiction in her spare time.
The U.S. Senate is expected to vote Monday on a constitutional amendment that would effectively overturn the Supreme Court's decision in Citizens United. The bill, sponsored by Senator Tom Udall (D-New Mexico), "grants Congress and the states the power to regulate the raising and spending of money and in-kind equivalents with respect to federal and state elections, respectively."
"This is a historic moment," said Marge Baker, executive vice president at People For the American Way, which has been one of the leaders of the push for a constitutional amendment. "The Citizens United decision came just four and a half years ago, and now the Senate is about to vote on an amendment to overturn it. Americans are fed up with the staggering amounts of money flooding elections. With this level of public support for taking money out of politics, it's clear that this is just the beginning of the push for an amendment."
Because it would amend the U.S. Constitution, the proposal requires a two-thirds majority to pass. It would then have to pass in the House by the same majority and be ratified by three-fourths of the state legislatures. According to Public Citizen, 50 senators have indicated their support for the amendment.
A poll of 800 likely voters commissioned by Public Citizen and conducted by two polling firms, one Democratic and one Republican, recently found that by a 2-1 margin, voters provided with a short description of the amendment are in favor of it.
"It's time for Congress to act on the people's demand for a constitutional amendment to overturn Citizens United and restore our democracy," said Robert Weissman, president of Public Citizen, in a statement. "This poll shows that the public, including Republican voters, forcefully rejects arguments from Senator Mitch McConnell and Senator Ted Cruz in defense of the status quo."
McConnell, Cruz, and other Republican officials have claimed that constraints on campaign spending amount to an assault on free speech. Earlier this summer, ACLU leaders bolstered that argument, saying they opposed the Udall amendment on the grounds that it would "severely limit the First Amendment, lead directly to government censorship of political speech and result in a host of unintended consequences that would undermine the goals the amendment has been introduced to advance -- namely encouraging vigorous political dissent and providing voice to the voiceless, which we, of course, support."
But on Thursday, a group of former ACLU leaders struck back in a letter to several high-ranking senators. "While, as present and former leaders of the ACLU, we take no position in this letter on whether a constitutional amendment is the most appropriate way to pursue campaign finance reform," the letter reads, "we believe that the current leadership of the National ACLU has endorsed a deeply contested and incorrect reading of the First Amendment as a rigid deregulatory strait jacket that threatens the integrity of American democracy."
Organizations like Public Citizen, MoveOn, and People for the American Way are encouraging voters to contact their senators and urge them to support the amendment. In Portsmouth, New Hampshire on Thursday, a group of about 25 activists delivered a petition with 10,500 signatures to the office of U.S. Senator Kelly Ayotte (R-NH); similar actions took place across the country.
Deirdre Fulton
Deirdre Fulton is a former Common Dreams senior editor and staff writer. Previously she worked as an editor and writer for the Portland Phoenix and the Boston Phoenix, where she was honored by the New England Press Association and the Association of Alternative Newsweeklies. A Boston University graduate, Deirdre is a co-founder of the Maine-based Lorem Ipsum Theater Collective and the PortFringe theater festival. She writes young adult fiction in her spare time.
The U.S. Senate is expected to vote Monday on a constitutional amendment that would effectively overturn the Supreme Court's decision in Citizens United. The bill, sponsored by Senator Tom Udall (D-New Mexico), "grants Congress and the states the power to regulate the raising and spending of money and in-kind equivalents with respect to federal and state elections, respectively."
"This is a historic moment," said Marge Baker, executive vice president at People For the American Way, which has been one of the leaders of the push for a constitutional amendment. "The Citizens United decision came just four and a half years ago, and now the Senate is about to vote on an amendment to overturn it. Americans are fed up with the staggering amounts of money flooding elections. With this level of public support for taking money out of politics, it's clear that this is just the beginning of the push for an amendment."
Because it would amend the U.S. Constitution, the proposal requires a two-thirds majority to pass. It would then have to pass in the House by the same majority and be ratified by three-fourths of the state legislatures. According to Public Citizen, 50 senators have indicated their support for the amendment.
A poll of 800 likely voters commissioned by Public Citizen and conducted by two polling firms, one Democratic and one Republican, recently found that by a 2-1 margin, voters provided with a short description of the amendment are in favor of it.
"It's time for Congress to act on the people's demand for a constitutional amendment to overturn Citizens United and restore our democracy," said Robert Weissman, president of Public Citizen, in a statement. "This poll shows that the public, including Republican voters, forcefully rejects arguments from Senator Mitch McConnell and Senator Ted Cruz in defense of the status quo."
McConnell, Cruz, and other Republican officials have claimed that constraints on campaign spending amount to an assault on free speech. Earlier this summer, ACLU leaders bolstered that argument, saying they opposed the Udall amendment on the grounds that it would "severely limit the First Amendment, lead directly to government censorship of political speech and result in a host of unintended consequences that would undermine the goals the amendment has been introduced to advance -- namely encouraging vigorous political dissent and providing voice to the voiceless, which we, of course, support."
But on Thursday, a group of former ACLU leaders struck back in a letter to several high-ranking senators. "While, as present and former leaders of the ACLU, we take no position in this letter on whether a constitutional amendment is the most appropriate way to pursue campaign finance reform," the letter reads, "we believe that the current leadership of the National ACLU has endorsed a deeply contested and incorrect reading of the First Amendment as a rigid deregulatory strait jacket that threatens the integrity of American democracy."
Organizations like Public Citizen, MoveOn, and People for the American Way are encouraging voters to contact their senators and urge them to support the amendment. In Portsmouth, New Hampshire on Thursday, a group of about 25 activists delivered a petition with 10,500 signatures to the office of U.S. Senator Kelly Ayotte (R-NH); similar actions took place across the country.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.