Activists in Erie, Colorado protest fracking in their community. (Photo: Erie Rising)
Sep 12, 2014
A coalition of environmental organizations this week filed a motion to preserve the groundbreaking ban on fracking enacted by Longmont, Colorado voters in 2012.
Our Health Our Future Our Longmont, Food & Water Watch, Sierra Club, and Earthworks, represented by the University of Denver Law Clinic, appealed a July ruling by a Colorado judge that struck down the prohibition. "We are committed to continuing to protect the health, safety and property of Longmont residents," said Kaye Fissinger, President of Our Health Our Future Our Longmont.
Boulder District Judge D.D. Mallard had ruled that Longmont's ban constitutes an "irreconcilable conflict" with the state's interests in oil and gas interests, and that the state takes precedence over the local ruling.
But the coalition that appealed the ruling argues that state law prohibits extractive policies that are harmful to the environment. "Fracking is an inherently harmful practice that has no place near our towns, homes and recreational areas," said Sam Schabacker, Western Region Director with Food & Water Watch. "It is the State's duty to ban fracking in order to uphold its responsibility to safeguard our communities and our natural resources."
Longmont was the first town in Colorado to instate a fracking moratorium, and four other cities and towns have since passed similar bans. But these grassroots initiatives face well-funded foes: in every case where a moratorium was passed, the municipality has been sued by oil and gas industries seeking to toss out the prohibitions. Last month a Colorado judge struck down a ban on fracking in Fort Collins and state politicians removed anti-fracking measures from the upcoming November ballot.
Fissinger told Common Dreams that the coalition appealing the Longmont ruling plans to take the case "all the way to the Colorado Supreme Court," adding, "We are hopeful that the courts will recognize the severity of this issue and will look at the subject with fresh and open eyes."
"If we are successful with this it will resonate around the country," she said. "Even the industry has acknowledged they are afraid if we succeed in Colorado it will have a domino effect."
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. Join with us today! |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Sarah Lazare
Sarah Lazare was a staff writer for Common Dreams from 2013-2016. She is currently web editor and reporter for In These Times.
A coalition of environmental organizations this week filed a motion to preserve the groundbreaking ban on fracking enacted by Longmont, Colorado voters in 2012.
Our Health Our Future Our Longmont, Food & Water Watch, Sierra Club, and Earthworks, represented by the University of Denver Law Clinic, appealed a July ruling by a Colorado judge that struck down the prohibition. "We are committed to continuing to protect the health, safety and property of Longmont residents," said Kaye Fissinger, President of Our Health Our Future Our Longmont.
Boulder District Judge D.D. Mallard had ruled that Longmont's ban constitutes an "irreconcilable conflict" with the state's interests in oil and gas interests, and that the state takes precedence over the local ruling.
But the coalition that appealed the ruling argues that state law prohibits extractive policies that are harmful to the environment. "Fracking is an inherently harmful practice that has no place near our towns, homes and recreational areas," said Sam Schabacker, Western Region Director with Food & Water Watch. "It is the State's duty to ban fracking in order to uphold its responsibility to safeguard our communities and our natural resources."
Longmont was the first town in Colorado to instate a fracking moratorium, and four other cities and towns have since passed similar bans. But these grassroots initiatives face well-funded foes: in every case where a moratorium was passed, the municipality has been sued by oil and gas industries seeking to toss out the prohibitions. Last month a Colorado judge struck down a ban on fracking in Fort Collins and state politicians removed anti-fracking measures from the upcoming November ballot.
Fissinger told Common Dreams that the coalition appealing the Longmont ruling plans to take the case "all the way to the Colorado Supreme Court," adding, "We are hopeful that the courts will recognize the severity of this issue and will look at the subject with fresh and open eyes."
"If we are successful with this it will resonate around the country," she said. "Even the industry has acknowledged they are afraid if we succeed in Colorado it will have a domino effect."
Sarah Lazare
Sarah Lazare was a staff writer for Common Dreams from 2013-2016. She is currently web editor and reporter for In These Times.
A coalition of environmental organizations this week filed a motion to preserve the groundbreaking ban on fracking enacted by Longmont, Colorado voters in 2012.
Our Health Our Future Our Longmont, Food & Water Watch, Sierra Club, and Earthworks, represented by the University of Denver Law Clinic, appealed a July ruling by a Colorado judge that struck down the prohibition. "We are committed to continuing to protect the health, safety and property of Longmont residents," said Kaye Fissinger, President of Our Health Our Future Our Longmont.
Boulder District Judge D.D. Mallard had ruled that Longmont's ban constitutes an "irreconcilable conflict" with the state's interests in oil and gas interests, and that the state takes precedence over the local ruling.
But the coalition that appealed the ruling argues that state law prohibits extractive policies that are harmful to the environment. "Fracking is an inherently harmful practice that has no place near our towns, homes and recreational areas," said Sam Schabacker, Western Region Director with Food & Water Watch. "It is the State's duty to ban fracking in order to uphold its responsibility to safeguard our communities and our natural resources."
Longmont was the first town in Colorado to instate a fracking moratorium, and four other cities and towns have since passed similar bans. But these grassroots initiatives face well-funded foes: in every case where a moratorium was passed, the municipality has been sued by oil and gas industries seeking to toss out the prohibitions. Last month a Colorado judge struck down a ban on fracking in Fort Collins and state politicians removed anti-fracking measures from the upcoming November ballot.
Fissinger told Common Dreams that the coalition appealing the Longmont ruling plans to take the case "all the way to the Colorado Supreme Court," adding, "We are hopeful that the courts will recognize the severity of this issue and will look at the subject with fresh and open eyes."
"If we are successful with this it will resonate around the country," she said. "Even the industry has acknowledged they are afraid if we succeed in Colorado it will have a domino effect."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.