SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
James Womack, currently serving as a hearing officer on the N.C. Mining and Energy Commission, says that if you think an outright ban on fracking is the right thing for North Carolina, your public comment "doesn't count." (Photo: IndyWeek/Jeremy M. Lange)
State Commissioner: If You Oppose Fracking in North Carolina, Your Comment "Doesn't Count"
“About half are repetitive ‘don’t frack’ comments,” said Commissioner James Womack. “They don’t really count, if you know what I mean.”
Oct 11, 2014
As North Caroline makes plans to open itself up to hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, public comments are pouring into the Mining and Energy Commission as it prepares to make recommendations to lawmakers about the safety guidelines that should govern the controversial gas drilling in the state.
However, for those telling the commission that fracking shouldn't be approved at all--that there are no amount of safety measures that could curtail the threats from the inherently destructive practice--at least one of the members of the commission, James Womack, has a message in return: Those comments don't count.
According to the News & Observer, of the more than 100,000 that have so far come in expressing input on fracking, approximately half declare support for an outright ban on the controversial drilling that uses enormous amounts of water, sand, and a secret stew of toxic chemicals to obtain gas trapped in shale formations beneath the surface.
And while the commission is charged with accepting and cataloging those public comments, Womack told the newspaper that what he considered "substantive, detailed comments" have been a fraction of the total, but that many more contained general opposition to fracking which he said were not "helpful" to the commission's work.
"About half are repetitive 'don't frack' comments," Womack said. "They don't really count, if you know what I mean."
Beyond an outright ban, many residents in North Carolina have specifically expressed worry about the fracking industry's desire to use so-called "open pits" to store toxic waste-water produced during the drilling process.
Last month, the Center for Biology Diversity blasted North Carolina's process of deliberation around fracking and said the state's rules--as currently proposed--put the people, water, and wildlife of the state at grave risk.
On Saturday, anti-fracking activists from around the world are participating in what they'd dubbed a "Global Frackdown" calling for a moratorium on fracking and demanding that governments at the international, national, and local level respond aggressively to the growing body of evidence that shows that natural gas is neither a "clean" form of energy nor one that can in any way help address the global water crisis or the threat posed by global warming and climate change.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
As North Caroline makes plans to open itself up to hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, public comments are pouring into the Mining and Energy Commission as it prepares to make recommendations to lawmakers about the safety guidelines that should govern the controversial gas drilling in the state.
However, for those telling the commission that fracking shouldn't be approved at all--that there are no amount of safety measures that could curtail the threats from the inherently destructive practice--at least one of the members of the commission, James Womack, has a message in return: Those comments don't count.
According to the News & Observer, of the more than 100,000 that have so far come in expressing input on fracking, approximately half declare support for an outright ban on the controversial drilling that uses enormous amounts of water, sand, and a secret stew of toxic chemicals to obtain gas trapped in shale formations beneath the surface.
And while the commission is charged with accepting and cataloging those public comments, Womack told the newspaper that what he considered "substantive, detailed comments" have been a fraction of the total, but that many more contained general opposition to fracking which he said were not "helpful" to the commission's work.
"About half are repetitive 'don't frack' comments," Womack said. "They don't really count, if you know what I mean."
Beyond an outright ban, many residents in North Carolina have specifically expressed worry about the fracking industry's desire to use so-called "open pits" to store toxic waste-water produced during the drilling process.
Last month, the Center for Biology Diversity blasted North Carolina's process of deliberation around fracking and said the state's rules--as currently proposed--put the people, water, and wildlife of the state at grave risk.
On Saturday, anti-fracking activists from around the world are participating in what they'd dubbed a "Global Frackdown" calling for a moratorium on fracking and demanding that governments at the international, national, and local level respond aggressively to the growing body of evidence that shows that natural gas is neither a "clean" form of energy nor one that can in any way help address the global water crisis or the threat posed by global warming and climate change.
As North Caroline makes plans to open itself up to hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, public comments are pouring into the Mining and Energy Commission as it prepares to make recommendations to lawmakers about the safety guidelines that should govern the controversial gas drilling in the state.
However, for those telling the commission that fracking shouldn't be approved at all--that there are no amount of safety measures that could curtail the threats from the inherently destructive practice--at least one of the members of the commission, James Womack, has a message in return: Those comments don't count.
According to the News & Observer, of the more than 100,000 that have so far come in expressing input on fracking, approximately half declare support for an outright ban on the controversial drilling that uses enormous amounts of water, sand, and a secret stew of toxic chemicals to obtain gas trapped in shale formations beneath the surface.
And while the commission is charged with accepting and cataloging those public comments, Womack told the newspaper that what he considered "substantive, detailed comments" have been a fraction of the total, but that many more contained general opposition to fracking which he said were not "helpful" to the commission's work.
"About half are repetitive 'don't frack' comments," Womack said. "They don't really count, if you know what I mean."
Beyond an outright ban, many residents in North Carolina have specifically expressed worry about the fracking industry's desire to use so-called "open pits" to store toxic waste-water produced during the drilling process.
Last month, the Center for Biology Diversity blasted North Carolina's process of deliberation around fracking and said the state's rules--as currently proposed--put the people, water, and wildlife of the state at grave risk.
On Saturday, anti-fracking activists from around the world are participating in what they'd dubbed a "Global Frackdown" calling for a moratorium on fracking and demanding that governments at the international, national, and local level respond aggressively to the growing body of evidence that shows that natural gas is neither a "clean" form of energy nor one that can in any way help address the global water crisis or the threat posed by global warming and climate change.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.