SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
'Internet Emergency': Protests to Sweep United States In Defense of Net Neutrality
'We are not going to roll over and let the FCC take our rights away'
Nov 06, 2014
Inspired by Hungary's recent victorious protests to defeat an internet tax, "Internet Emergency" vigils to defend net neutrality are slated to sweep the United States Thursday evening.
In over a dozen cities across the United States, "demonstrators will hold their cell phones, laptops, and tablets above their heads as a symbol of protest, and shine light on the corruption unfolding in Washington, DC.," according to a statement from organizers, who include Fight for the Future, PopularResistance.org, Free Press, Demand Progress, reddit, and grassroots groups.
Under the leadership of chairman Tom Wheeler, a former lobbyist for the cable and telecommunications industry, the Federal Communications Commission is currently considering what the New York Times calls a "hybrid regulatory approach to net neutrality." Open internet campaigners warn that the new rules fall short of the strong net neutrality protections that are needed, because it would allow for internet fast and slow lanes.
"This so-called hybrid approach is not a compromise, it is a sham," Evan Greer of Fight for the Future told Common Dreams. "It allows companies to cut deals with content providers for access to better service. It's based on untested legal theories that are shaky and won't hold up in court. Given that the chair of the FCC is a former cable company lobbyist, it is hard not to assume it will fail on purpose."
Advocates of Net Neutrality are calling for the FCC to reclassify the internet under Title II of the Communications Act, which would treat the service as something to be protected in the public interest, like water and electricity.
Thursday's coordinated actions are just the latest in massive mobilizations to defend net neutrality, including an "Internet Slowdown" protest in September, during which supporters made more than 312,000 calls to Congress and submitted over 700,000 comments to the FCC.
Campaigners say the issue has attracted broad support because it is a matter of social justice and access to resources for the poor and marginalized, at a time of media consolidation and corporate power.
"The internet is an important avenue to freely express ourselves and communicate," Margaret Flowers of PopularResistance.org told Common Dreams. "If it is no longer an open platform, we will see corporate voices dominate.
"We are not going to roll over and let the FCC take our rights away," said Greer. "Those in power should expect rebellion over this if they don't listen to the public and do the right thing."
Reports and commentary on the vigils are being posted to Twitter:
We are at a crossroads
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. US voters have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. If you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Sarah Lazare
Sarah Lazare is the editor of Workday Magazine and a contributing editor for In These Times. She is a former Staff Writer at Common Dreams. She comes from a background in independent journalism for publications including The Intercept, The Nation, and Tom Dispatch.
Inspired by Hungary's recent victorious protests to defeat an internet tax, "Internet Emergency" vigils to defend net neutrality are slated to sweep the United States Thursday evening.
In over a dozen cities across the United States, "demonstrators will hold their cell phones, laptops, and tablets above their heads as a symbol of protest, and shine light on the corruption unfolding in Washington, DC.," according to a statement from organizers, who include Fight for the Future, PopularResistance.org, Free Press, Demand Progress, reddit, and grassroots groups.
Under the leadership of chairman Tom Wheeler, a former lobbyist for the cable and telecommunications industry, the Federal Communications Commission is currently considering what the New York Times calls a "hybrid regulatory approach to net neutrality." Open internet campaigners warn that the new rules fall short of the strong net neutrality protections that are needed, because it would allow for internet fast and slow lanes.
"This so-called hybrid approach is not a compromise, it is a sham," Evan Greer of Fight for the Future told Common Dreams. "It allows companies to cut deals with content providers for access to better service. It's based on untested legal theories that are shaky and won't hold up in court. Given that the chair of the FCC is a former cable company lobbyist, it is hard not to assume it will fail on purpose."
Advocates of Net Neutrality are calling for the FCC to reclassify the internet under Title II of the Communications Act, which would treat the service as something to be protected in the public interest, like water and electricity.
Thursday's coordinated actions are just the latest in massive mobilizations to defend net neutrality, including an "Internet Slowdown" protest in September, during which supporters made more than 312,000 calls to Congress and submitted over 700,000 comments to the FCC.
Campaigners say the issue has attracted broad support because it is a matter of social justice and access to resources for the poor and marginalized, at a time of media consolidation and corporate power.
"The internet is an important avenue to freely express ourselves and communicate," Margaret Flowers of PopularResistance.org told Common Dreams. "If it is no longer an open platform, we will see corporate voices dominate.
"We are not going to roll over and let the FCC take our rights away," said Greer. "Those in power should expect rebellion over this if they don't listen to the public and do the right thing."
Reports and commentary on the vigils are being posted to Twitter:
Sarah Lazare
Sarah Lazare is the editor of Workday Magazine and a contributing editor for In These Times. She is a former Staff Writer at Common Dreams. She comes from a background in independent journalism for publications including The Intercept, The Nation, and Tom Dispatch.
Inspired by Hungary's recent victorious protests to defeat an internet tax, "Internet Emergency" vigils to defend net neutrality are slated to sweep the United States Thursday evening.
In over a dozen cities across the United States, "demonstrators will hold their cell phones, laptops, and tablets above their heads as a symbol of protest, and shine light on the corruption unfolding in Washington, DC.," according to a statement from organizers, who include Fight for the Future, PopularResistance.org, Free Press, Demand Progress, reddit, and grassroots groups.
Under the leadership of chairman Tom Wheeler, a former lobbyist for the cable and telecommunications industry, the Federal Communications Commission is currently considering what the New York Times calls a "hybrid regulatory approach to net neutrality." Open internet campaigners warn that the new rules fall short of the strong net neutrality protections that are needed, because it would allow for internet fast and slow lanes.
"This so-called hybrid approach is not a compromise, it is a sham," Evan Greer of Fight for the Future told Common Dreams. "It allows companies to cut deals with content providers for access to better service. It's based on untested legal theories that are shaky and won't hold up in court. Given that the chair of the FCC is a former cable company lobbyist, it is hard not to assume it will fail on purpose."
Advocates of Net Neutrality are calling for the FCC to reclassify the internet under Title II of the Communications Act, which would treat the service as something to be protected in the public interest, like water and electricity.
Thursday's coordinated actions are just the latest in massive mobilizations to defend net neutrality, including an "Internet Slowdown" protest in September, during which supporters made more than 312,000 calls to Congress and submitted over 700,000 comments to the FCC.
Campaigners say the issue has attracted broad support because it is a matter of social justice and access to resources for the poor and marginalized, at a time of media consolidation and corporate power.
"The internet is an important avenue to freely express ourselves and communicate," Margaret Flowers of PopularResistance.org told Common Dreams. "If it is no longer an open platform, we will see corporate voices dominate.
"We are not going to roll over and let the FCC take our rights away," said Greer. "Those in power should expect rebellion over this if they don't listen to the public and do the right thing."
Reports and commentary on the vigils are being posted to Twitter:
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.
To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good.
News & Opinion
Trending
Common Dreams, Inc. Founded 1997. Registered 501(c3) Non-Profit
Privacy Policy