CIA Head Speaks Out on Torture Report But Question Remains: 'What's Going to Happen?'
'Those people who commit acts of torture as the CIA did must be prosecuted. It's a mandatory obligation of international law,' says CCR's Dixon.
"Deceit and obfuscation."
That's what CIA Director John Brennan offered Thursday, one observer says, at a press conference just days after the release of the Senate Intelligence Committee's report on his agency's torture program in the wake of the Sept. 11 attacks.
Brennan, who said there's been "more than enough transparency" since the its release, criticized the committee's process for the report as "flawed," and said that "there were times when CIA officers exceeded the policy guidance," and that "we fell short when it came to holding some officers accountable for their mistakes."
J. Wells Dixon, a senior staff attorney at the Center for Constitutional Rights told MSNBC's Joy Reid: "I think [Brennan's] presentation was just another example of the deceit and obfuscation we've seen from current and former government officials who have really tried to undermine this report at all turns." Dixon added that he doesn't think Brennan "believes the lies that he's telling."
Brennan was asked whether the torture--or Enhanced Interrogation Techniques (EITs) as Brennan and most members of the media there called it--was effective in providing useful counter-terrorism information. Dixon said that focus misses the mark.
"The question whether these torture techniques led to useful information or not is the wrong question to ask," Dixon said. "The question to ask is, 'What's going to happen?'"
"There's an absolute worldwide ban on torture. There is no exception for exigent circumstances. There's no justification at all. In fact, those people who commit acts of torture as the CIA did must be prosecuted. It's a mandatory obligation of international law," he said.
As for other countries exercising universal jurisdiction to arrest those involved, Dixon said that the longer it takes for the U.S. to prosecute those who executed or authorized torture, the likelier that scenario becomes. "Torture is a crime of universal jurisdiction," he stressed.
Asked whether the torture program could return in the future if "faced with an imminent threat," Brennan did not rule that possibility out. He said: "As far as what happens if, in the future, there is some type of challenge that we face here, the Army Field Manual is the established basis to use for interrogations. We, CIA, are not in the detention program. We are not contemplating at all getting back into the detention program using any of those EITs. So I defer to the policymakers in future times when there is going to be the need to be able to ensure that this country stays safe if we face a similar type of crisis."
But accountability for the torture program is what would stop its resurrection, said ACLU Executive Director Anthony Romero.
"If we don't hold officials accountable for ordering that conduct, our government will adopt these methods again in the future," Romero stated. "The fact that President Obama's CIA director believes that these methods remain a policy option for the next administration shows why we need a special prosecutor. We have to ensure that this never happens again."
Urgent. It's never been this bad.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission from the outset was simple. To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It’s never been this bad out there. And it’s never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed and doing some of its best and most important work, the threats we face are intensifying. Right now, with just three days to go in our Spring Campaign, we're falling short of our make-or-break goal. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Can you make a gift right now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? There is no backup plan or rainy day fund. There is only you. —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
"Deceit and obfuscation."
That's what CIA Director John Brennan offered Thursday, one observer says, at a press conference just days after the release of the Senate Intelligence Committee's report on his agency's torture program in the wake of the Sept. 11 attacks.
Brennan, who said there's been "more than enough transparency" since the its release, criticized the committee's process for the report as "flawed," and said that "there were times when CIA officers exceeded the policy guidance," and that "we fell short when it came to holding some officers accountable for their mistakes."
J. Wells Dixon, a senior staff attorney at the Center for Constitutional Rights told MSNBC's Joy Reid: "I think [Brennan's] presentation was just another example of the deceit and obfuscation we've seen from current and former government officials who have really tried to undermine this report at all turns." Dixon added that he doesn't think Brennan "believes the lies that he's telling."
Brennan was asked whether the torture--or Enhanced Interrogation Techniques (EITs) as Brennan and most members of the media there called it--was effective in providing useful counter-terrorism information. Dixon said that focus misses the mark.
"The question whether these torture techniques led to useful information or not is the wrong question to ask," Dixon said. "The question to ask is, 'What's going to happen?'"
"There's an absolute worldwide ban on torture. There is no exception for exigent circumstances. There's no justification at all. In fact, those people who commit acts of torture as the CIA did must be prosecuted. It's a mandatory obligation of international law," he said.
As for other countries exercising universal jurisdiction to arrest those involved, Dixon said that the longer it takes for the U.S. to prosecute those who executed or authorized torture, the likelier that scenario becomes. "Torture is a crime of universal jurisdiction," he stressed.
Asked whether the torture program could return in the future if "faced with an imminent threat," Brennan did not rule that possibility out. He said: "As far as what happens if, in the future, there is some type of challenge that we face here, the Army Field Manual is the established basis to use for interrogations. We, CIA, are not in the detention program. We are not contemplating at all getting back into the detention program using any of those EITs. So I defer to the policymakers in future times when there is going to be the need to be able to ensure that this country stays safe if we face a similar type of crisis."
But accountability for the torture program is what would stop its resurrection, said ACLU Executive Director Anthony Romero.
"If we don't hold officials accountable for ordering that conduct, our government will adopt these methods again in the future," Romero stated. "The fact that President Obama's CIA director believes that these methods remain a policy option for the next administration shows why we need a special prosecutor. We have to ensure that this never happens again."
"Deceit and obfuscation."
That's what CIA Director John Brennan offered Thursday, one observer says, at a press conference just days after the release of the Senate Intelligence Committee's report on his agency's torture program in the wake of the Sept. 11 attacks.
Brennan, who said there's been "more than enough transparency" since the its release, criticized the committee's process for the report as "flawed," and said that "there were times when CIA officers exceeded the policy guidance," and that "we fell short when it came to holding some officers accountable for their mistakes."
J. Wells Dixon, a senior staff attorney at the Center for Constitutional Rights told MSNBC's Joy Reid: "I think [Brennan's] presentation was just another example of the deceit and obfuscation we've seen from current and former government officials who have really tried to undermine this report at all turns." Dixon added that he doesn't think Brennan "believes the lies that he's telling."
Brennan was asked whether the torture--or Enhanced Interrogation Techniques (EITs) as Brennan and most members of the media there called it--was effective in providing useful counter-terrorism information. Dixon said that focus misses the mark.
"The question whether these torture techniques led to useful information or not is the wrong question to ask," Dixon said. "The question to ask is, 'What's going to happen?'"
"There's an absolute worldwide ban on torture. There is no exception for exigent circumstances. There's no justification at all. In fact, those people who commit acts of torture as the CIA did must be prosecuted. It's a mandatory obligation of international law," he said.
As for other countries exercising universal jurisdiction to arrest those involved, Dixon said that the longer it takes for the U.S. to prosecute those who executed or authorized torture, the likelier that scenario becomes. "Torture is a crime of universal jurisdiction," he stressed.
Asked whether the torture program could return in the future if "faced with an imminent threat," Brennan did not rule that possibility out. He said: "As far as what happens if, in the future, there is some type of challenge that we face here, the Army Field Manual is the established basis to use for interrogations. We, CIA, are not in the detention program. We are not contemplating at all getting back into the detention program using any of those EITs. So I defer to the policymakers in future times when there is going to be the need to be able to ensure that this country stays safe if we face a similar type of crisis."
But accountability for the torture program is what would stop its resurrection, said ACLU Executive Director Anthony Romero.
"If we don't hold officials accountable for ordering that conduct, our government will adopt these methods again in the future," Romero stated. "The fact that President Obama's CIA director believes that these methods remain a policy option for the next administration shows why we need a special prosecutor. We have to ensure that this never happens again."