SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
In a move that advocates are saying is a "momentous" win for public health, an Indian court on Friday rejected a bid from multinational pharmaceutical giant Bayer to block a local generic drug company from mimicking their costly cancer drug.
Bayer had attempted to appeal a 2012 decision by India's patent controller, who had argued the monthly $5,500-per-person cost charged by Bayer for the liver and kidney drug Nexevar was too costly for most Indians. The Hyderabad-based Natco Pharma's version of the drug costs roughly 97% less.
Friday's court's decision highlights India's "critical role" in "balancing intellectual property and public health," Leena Menghaney, South Asia regional head of Medicins San Frontieres (MSF)/ Doctor's Without Borders' regional access campaign, told AFP.
Observers are saying that the decision may have far-reaching impact on the drug market because of India's dominance in the pharmaceutical industry. AFP reports:
India'a Lawyers' Collective, another rights group, said the "momentous" judgement held wide-ranging implications for access to other medicines.
India's vast generics industry is a major supplier of cheap copycat, life-saving drugs to treat diabetes, cancer and other diseases afflicting people locally and globally who cannot afford expensive branded versions.
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
In a move that advocates are saying is a "momentous" win for public health, an Indian court on Friday rejected a bid from multinational pharmaceutical giant Bayer to block a local generic drug company from mimicking their costly cancer drug.
Bayer had attempted to appeal a 2012 decision by India's patent controller, who had argued the monthly $5,500-per-person cost charged by Bayer for the liver and kidney drug Nexevar was too costly for most Indians. The Hyderabad-based Natco Pharma's version of the drug costs roughly 97% less.
Friday's court's decision highlights India's "critical role" in "balancing intellectual property and public health," Leena Menghaney, South Asia regional head of Medicins San Frontieres (MSF)/ Doctor's Without Borders' regional access campaign, told AFP.
Observers are saying that the decision may have far-reaching impact on the drug market because of India's dominance in the pharmaceutical industry. AFP reports:
India'a Lawyers' Collective, another rights group, said the "momentous" judgement held wide-ranging implications for access to other medicines.
India's vast generics industry is a major supplier of cheap copycat, life-saving drugs to treat diabetes, cancer and other diseases afflicting people locally and globally who cannot afford expensive branded versions.
In a move that advocates are saying is a "momentous" win for public health, an Indian court on Friday rejected a bid from multinational pharmaceutical giant Bayer to block a local generic drug company from mimicking their costly cancer drug.
Bayer had attempted to appeal a 2012 decision by India's patent controller, who had argued the monthly $5,500-per-person cost charged by Bayer for the liver and kidney drug Nexevar was too costly for most Indians. The Hyderabad-based Natco Pharma's version of the drug costs roughly 97% less.
Friday's court's decision highlights India's "critical role" in "balancing intellectual property and public health," Leena Menghaney, South Asia regional head of Medicins San Frontieres (MSF)/ Doctor's Without Borders' regional access campaign, told AFP.
Observers are saying that the decision may have far-reaching impact on the drug market because of India's dominance in the pharmaceutical industry. AFP reports:
India'a Lawyers' Collective, another rights group, said the "momentous" judgement held wide-ranging implications for access to other medicines.
India's vast generics industry is a major supplier of cheap copycat, life-saving drugs to treat diabetes, cancer and other diseases afflicting people locally and globally who cannot afford expensive branded versions.