SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
"350.org and their allies paraded a giant 200 yard inflatable pipeline around the Capitol Building before the State of the Union to demand that the President Obama reject the controversial Keystone XL tar sands pipeline January 27, 2014." (Photo: Steven Tuttle/flickr/cc)
Obama Promises Veto on Keystone XL Legislation
Environmental groups say 'good'—now kill the project for good
Jan 06, 2015
President Barack Obama will veto any legislation that forces the approval of the Keystone XL pipeline, the White House said Tuesday.
The announcement came as Republicans took control of Congress, and Senators John Hoeven (R-N.D.) and Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) promptly introduced legislation to green-light the tar sands pipeline.
"If this bill passes this Congress, the president wouldn't sign it," White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest said.
The Republican-majority House is expected to vote on legislation to approve the pipeline this week.
"There is already a well-established process in place to consider whether or not infrastructure projects like this are in the best interest of the country," Earnest continued. As the Washington Postreported, "That process is held up by a lawsuit in Nebraska over whether the state legislature could allow the governor to make decisions on the pipeline rather than the state's Public Utilities Commission."
Environmental groups welcomed Obama's veto threat--but urged that the president kill the project for good.
"The decision to approve or deny Keystone XL has always belonged to the President alone, and he has now made it clear that he'll reject attacks on that authority," stated Michael Brune, Executive Director of the Sierra Club. "President Obama has also said he'd oppose the tar sands pipeline if it contributes to the climate crisis. He has all the evidence he needs to know that it does and reject Keystone XL."
Peter Galvin, director of programs at the Center for Biological Diversity, called the veto promise "encouraging," and stated: "Keystone would be a disaster for our climate and wildlife, so here's hoping this is his first step toward killing this project once and for all."
"This is the moment where we need President Obama to stand strong and on the right side of history," Galvin continued. "Keystone and projects like it have driven us into the climate crisis. The first step toward getting us out of this hole is to stop digging deeper."
Echoing a statement from 350.org Executive Director May Boeve, Rainforest Action Network Climate Program Director Amanda Starbuck said that the White House promise was the result of indefatigable climate activists.
"Together this movement has marched, written letters, sat in at the White House and along the route of the pipeline, and self-organized a large-scale network ready to do whatever it takes to win a rejection on Keystone. It's an important day for the climate and for communities when the President decides to side with the people over the fossil fuel corporations who are wrecking our climate for profit," Starbuck said.
An Unconstitutional Rampage
Trump and Musk are on an unconstitutional rampage, aiming for virtually every corner of the federal government. These two right-wing billionaires are targeting nurses, scientists, teachers, daycare providers, judges, veterans, air traffic controllers, and nuclear safety inspectors. No one is safe. The food stamps program, Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid are next. It’s an unprecedented disaster and a five-alarm fire, but there will be a reckoning. The people did not vote for this. The American people do not want this dystopian hellscape that hides behind claims of “efficiency.” Still, in reality, it is all a giveaway to corporate interests and the libertarian dreams of far-right oligarchs like Musk. Common Dreams is playing a vital role by reporting day and night on this orgy of corruption and greed, as well as what everyday people can do to organize and fight back. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover issues the corporate media never will, but we can only continue with our readers’ support. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
President Barack Obama will veto any legislation that forces the approval of the Keystone XL pipeline, the White House said Tuesday.
The announcement came as Republicans took control of Congress, and Senators John Hoeven (R-N.D.) and Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) promptly introduced legislation to green-light the tar sands pipeline.
"If this bill passes this Congress, the president wouldn't sign it," White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest said.
The Republican-majority House is expected to vote on legislation to approve the pipeline this week.
"There is already a well-established process in place to consider whether or not infrastructure projects like this are in the best interest of the country," Earnest continued. As the Washington Postreported, "That process is held up by a lawsuit in Nebraska over whether the state legislature could allow the governor to make decisions on the pipeline rather than the state's Public Utilities Commission."
Environmental groups welcomed Obama's veto threat--but urged that the president kill the project for good.
"The decision to approve or deny Keystone XL has always belonged to the President alone, and he has now made it clear that he'll reject attacks on that authority," stated Michael Brune, Executive Director of the Sierra Club. "President Obama has also said he'd oppose the tar sands pipeline if it contributes to the climate crisis. He has all the evidence he needs to know that it does and reject Keystone XL."
Peter Galvin, director of programs at the Center for Biological Diversity, called the veto promise "encouraging," and stated: "Keystone would be a disaster for our climate and wildlife, so here's hoping this is his first step toward killing this project once and for all."
"This is the moment where we need President Obama to stand strong and on the right side of history," Galvin continued. "Keystone and projects like it have driven us into the climate crisis. The first step toward getting us out of this hole is to stop digging deeper."
Echoing a statement from 350.org Executive Director May Boeve, Rainforest Action Network Climate Program Director Amanda Starbuck said that the White House promise was the result of indefatigable climate activists.
"Together this movement has marched, written letters, sat in at the White House and along the route of the pipeline, and self-organized a large-scale network ready to do whatever it takes to win a rejection on Keystone. It's an important day for the climate and for communities when the President decides to side with the people over the fossil fuel corporations who are wrecking our climate for profit," Starbuck said.
President Barack Obama will veto any legislation that forces the approval of the Keystone XL pipeline, the White House said Tuesday.
The announcement came as Republicans took control of Congress, and Senators John Hoeven (R-N.D.) and Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) promptly introduced legislation to green-light the tar sands pipeline.
"If this bill passes this Congress, the president wouldn't sign it," White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest said.
The Republican-majority House is expected to vote on legislation to approve the pipeline this week.
"There is already a well-established process in place to consider whether or not infrastructure projects like this are in the best interest of the country," Earnest continued. As the Washington Postreported, "That process is held up by a lawsuit in Nebraska over whether the state legislature could allow the governor to make decisions on the pipeline rather than the state's Public Utilities Commission."
Environmental groups welcomed Obama's veto threat--but urged that the president kill the project for good.
"The decision to approve or deny Keystone XL has always belonged to the President alone, and he has now made it clear that he'll reject attacks on that authority," stated Michael Brune, Executive Director of the Sierra Club. "President Obama has also said he'd oppose the tar sands pipeline if it contributes to the climate crisis. He has all the evidence he needs to know that it does and reject Keystone XL."
Peter Galvin, director of programs at the Center for Biological Diversity, called the veto promise "encouraging," and stated: "Keystone would be a disaster for our climate and wildlife, so here's hoping this is his first step toward killing this project once and for all."
"This is the moment where we need President Obama to stand strong and on the right side of history," Galvin continued. "Keystone and projects like it have driven us into the climate crisis. The first step toward getting us out of this hole is to stop digging deeper."
Echoing a statement from 350.org Executive Director May Boeve, Rainforest Action Network Climate Program Director Amanda Starbuck said that the White House promise was the result of indefatigable climate activists.
"Together this movement has marched, written letters, sat in at the White House and along the route of the pipeline, and self-organized a large-scale network ready to do whatever it takes to win a rejection on Keystone. It's an important day for the climate and for communities when the President decides to side with the people over the fossil fuel corporations who are wrecking our climate for profit," Starbuck said.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.