SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Obama Promises Veto on Keystone XL Legislation
Environmental groups say 'good'—now kill the project for good
Jan 06, 2015
President Barack Obama will veto any legislation that forces the approval of the Keystone XL pipeline, the White House said Tuesday.
The announcement came as Republicans took control of Congress, and Senators John Hoeven (R-N.D.) and Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) promptly introduced legislation to green-light the tar sands pipeline.
"If this bill passes this Congress, the president wouldn't sign it," White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest said.
The Republican-majority House is expected to vote on legislation to approve the pipeline this week.
"There is already a well-established process in place to consider whether or not infrastructure projects like this are in the best interest of the country," Earnest continued. As the Washington Post reported, "That process is held up by a lawsuit in Nebraska over whether the state legislature could allow the governor to make decisions on the pipeline rather than the state's Public Utilities Commission."
Environmental groups welcomed Obama's veto threat--but urged that the president kill the project for good.
"The decision to approve or deny Keystone XL has always belonged to the President alone, and he has now made it clear that he'll reject attacks on that authority," stated Michael Brune, Executive Director of the Sierra Club. "President Obama has also said he'd oppose the tar sands pipeline if it contributes to the climate crisis. He has all the evidence he needs to know that it does and reject Keystone XL."
Peter Galvin, director of programs at the Center for Biological Diversity, called the veto promise "encouraging," and stated: "Keystone would be a disaster for our climate and wildlife, so here's hoping this is his first step toward killing this project once and for all."
"This is the moment where we need President Obama to stand strong and on the right side of history," Galvin continued. "Keystone and projects like it have driven us into the climate crisis. The first step toward getting us out of this hole is to stop digging deeper."
Echoing a statement from 350.org Executive Director May Boeve, Rainforest Action Network Climate Program Director Amanda Starbuck said that the White House promise was the result of indefatigable climate activists.
"Together this movement has marched, written letters, sat in at the White House and along the route of the pipeline, and self-organized a large-scale network ready to do whatever it takes to win a rejection on Keystone. It's an important day for the climate and for communities when the President decides to side with the people over the fossil fuel corporations who are wrecking our climate for profit," Starbuck said.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
President Barack Obama will veto any legislation that forces the approval of the Keystone XL pipeline, the White House said Tuesday.
The announcement came as Republicans took control of Congress, and Senators John Hoeven (R-N.D.) and Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) promptly introduced legislation to green-light the tar sands pipeline.
"If this bill passes this Congress, the president wouldn't sign it," White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest said.
The Republican-majority House is expected to vote on legislation to approve the pipeline this week.
"There is already a well-established process in place to consider whether or not infrastructure projects like this are in the best interest of the country," Earnest continued. As the Washington Post reported, "That process is held up by a lawsuit in Nebraska over whether the state legislature could allow the governor to make decisions on the pipeline rather than the state's Public Utilities Commission."
Environmental groups welcomed Obama's veto threat--but urged that the president kill the project for good.
"The decision to approve or deny Keystone XL has always belonged to the President alone, and he has now made it clear that he'll reject attacks on that authority," stated Michael Brune, Executive Director of the Sierra Club. "President Obama has also said he'd oppose the tar sands pipeline if it contributes to the climate crisis. He has all the evidence he needs to know that it does and reject Keystone XL."
Peter Galvin, director of programs at the Center for Biological Diversity, called the veto promise "encouraging," and stated: "Keystone would be a disaster for our climate and wildlife, so here's hoping this is his first step toward killing this project once and for all."
"This is the moment where we need President Obama to stand strong and on the right side of history," Galvin continued. "Keystone and projects like it have driven us into the climate crisis. The first step toward getting us out of this hole is to stop digging deeper."
Echoing a statement from 350.org Executive Director May Boeve, Rainforest Action Network Climate Program Director Amanda Starbuck said that the White House promise was the result of indefatigable climate activists.
"Together this movement has marched, written letters, sat in at the White House and along the route of the pipeline, and self-organized a large-scale network ready to do whatever it takes to win a rejection on Keystone. It's an important day for the climate and for communities when the President decides to side with the people over the fossil fuel corporations who are wrecking our climate for profit," Starbuck said.
President Barack Obama will veto any legislation that forces the approval of the Keystone XL pipeline, the White House said Tuesday.
The announcement came as Republicans took control of Congress, and Senators John Hoeven (R-N.D.) and Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) promptly introduced legislation to green-light the tar sands pipeline.
"If this bill passes this Congress, the president wouldn't sign it," White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest said.
The Republican-majority House is expected to vote on legislation to approve the pipeline this week.
"There is already a well-established process in place to consider whether or not infrastructure projects like this are in the best interest of the country," Earnest continued. As the Washington Post reported, "That process is held up by a lawsuit in Nebraska over whether the state legislature could allow the governor to make decisions on the pipeline rather than the state's Public Utilities Commission."
Environmental groups welcomed Obama's veto threat--but urged that the president kill the project for good.
"The decision to approve or deny Keystone XL has always belonged to the President alone, and he has now made it clear that he'll reject attacks on that authority," stated Michael Brune, Executive Director of the Sierra Club. "President Obama has also said he'd oppose the tar sands pipeline if it contributes to the climate crisis. He has all the evidence he needs to know that it does and reject Keystone XL."
Peter Galvin, director of programs at the Center for Biological Diversity, called the veto promise "encouraging," and stated: "Keystone would be a disaster for our climate and wildlife, so here's hoping this is his first step toward killing this project once and for all."
"This is the moment where we need President Obama to stand strong and on the right side of history," Galvin continued. "Keystone and projects like it have driven us into the climate crisis. The first step toward getting us out of this hole is to stop digging deeper."
Echoing a statement from 350.org Executive Director May Boeve, Rainforest Action Network Climate Program Director Amanda Starbuck said that the White House promise was the result of indefatigable climate activists.
"Together this movement has marched, written letters, sat in at the White House and along the route of the pipeline, and self-organized a large-scale network ready to do whatever it takes to win a rejection on Keystone. It's an important day for the climate and for communities when the President decides to side with the people over the fossil fuel corporations who are wrecking our climate for profit," Starbuck said.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.