SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
FCC Poised to Protect Local Internet Alternatives Over Service Giants
Proposal would strike down laws that prevent municipal broadband development
Feb 03, 2015
In what could be a major victory for public alternatives to internet service giants , the Federal Communications Commission introduced a draft proposal to kill municipal broadband limits in two states this week.
Commissioners are expected to vote on the proposal on February 26, the same day they are likely to vote on net neutrality regulations. The draft was introduced by FCC chairman Tom Wheeler.
If passed, the policy will preempt state laws that limit the extent to which cities can buy and operate internet service--laws which are reportedly preventing alternative, publicly-owned broadband providers from competing with major ISP companies like Comcast and Verizon. Local broadband operators petitioned the FCC to intervene on their behalf.
According to commissioners, the FCC has the authority from Congress and the Constitution to strike down barriers to broadband investment and competition. And under Section 706 of the Communications Act, the commission may also actively promote broadband development, which the petitioners say is at stake over these laws.
In Tennessee, operators are forbidden from building high-capacity networks beyond a certain geographical point, which the petitioners say has prevented them from providing internet to under-served communities. In North Carolina, public broadband is forbidden from having prices lower than a private carrier plan. Other regulations, the petitioners say, give preference to those private companies, particularly Comcast and Verizon.
Observers note that if the proposal is approved, it would likely pave the way for future legal battles in at least 19 other states which have similar laws on the books. A win for municipal broadband operators in Tennessee and North Carolina would set an important precedent for cities in Texas, Florida, Arkansas, and Iowa, among others, where some laws outright prohibit municipalities from building their own internet, according to (pdf) consumer watchdog group Free Press.
President Barack Obama in January called for an end to those laws, saying they harm broadband competition and inhibit local communities from meeting the needs of their citizens. His announcement was hailed by advocates as a "great moment for the principal of local self-reliance."
Despite support from the White House, the FCC still faces some challenges in striking down those laws. Republicans in Congress introduced a net neutrality bill last month which, if passed, would forbid the FCC from reclassifying the internet as a public utility under Title II of the Communications Act, gutting the commission of its power over the broadband industry. And many in the GOP, including some of the FCC's own commissioners, like Ajit Pai, say Section 706 does not grant the agency the power to intervene in city and state jurisdictional conflict.
Still, consumer advocates are optimistic for improved regulation of broadband laws. "Supporting cities' ability to create their own high-speed networks is essential for our broadband future," said Free Press president Craig Aaron last month. "The industry's monopoly-minded efforts to regulate away competition are part of a long history of abusive policies that have left too many Americans stranded on the wrong side of the digital divide."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
In what could be a major victory for public alternatives to internet service giants , the Federal Communications Commission introduced a draft proposal to kill municipal broadband limits in two states this week.
Commissioners are expected to vote on the proposal on February 26, the same day they are likely to vote on net neutrality regulations. The draft was introduced by FCC chairman Tom Wheeler.
If passed, the policy will preempt state laws that limit the extent to which cities can buy and operate internet service--laws which are reportedly preventing alternative, publicly-owned broadband providers from competing with major ISP companies like Comcast and Verizon. Local broadband operators petitioned the FCC to intervene on their behalf.
According to commissioners, the FCC has the authority from Congress and the Constitution to strike down barriers to broadband investment and competition. And under Section 706 of the Communications Act, the commission may also actively promote broadband development, which the petitioners say is at stake over these laws.
In Tennessee, operators are forbidden from building high-capacity networks beyond a certain geographical point, which the petitioners say has prevented them from providing internet to under-served communities. In North Carolina, public broadband is forbidden from having prices lower than a private carrier plan. Other regulations, the petitioners say, give preference to those private companies, particularly Comcast and Verizon.
Observers note that if the proposal is approved, it would likely pave the way for future legal battles in at least 19 other states which have similar laws on the books. A win for municipal broadband operators in Tennessee and North Carolina would set an important precedent for cities in Texas, Florida, Arkansas, and Iowa, among others, where some laws outright prohibit municipalities from building their own internet, according to (pdf) consumer watchdog group Free Press.
President Barack Obama in January called for an end to those laws, saying they harm broadband competition and inhibit local communities from meeting the needs of their citizens. His announcement was hailed by advocates as a "great moment for the principal of local self-reliance."
Despite support from the White House, the FCC still faces some challenges in striking down those laws. Republicans in Congress introduced a net neutrality bill last month which, if passed, would forbid the FCC from reclassifying the internet as a public utility under Title II of the Communications Act, gutting the commission of its power over the broadband industry. And many in the GOP, including some of the FCC's own commissioners, like Ajit Pai, say Section 706 does not grant the agency the power to intervene in city and state jurisdictional conflict.
Still, consumer advocates are optimistic for improved regulation of broadband laws. "Supporting cities' ability to create their own high-speed networks is essential for our broadband future," said Free Press president Craig Aaron last month. "The industry's monopoly-minded efforts to regulate away competition are part of a long history of abusive policies that have left too many Americans stranded on the wrong side of the digital divide."
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
In what could be a major victory for public alternatives to internet service giants , the Federal Communications Commission introduced a draft proposal to kill municipal broadband limits in two states this week.
Commissioners are expected to vote on the proposal on February 26, the same day they are likely to vote on net neutrality regulations. The draft was introduced by FCC chairman Tom Wheeler.
If passed, the policy will preempt state laws that limit the extent to which cities can buy and operate internet service--laws which are reportedly preventing alternative, publicly-owned broadband providers from competing with major ISP companies like Comcast and Verizon. Local broadband operators petitioned the FCC to intervene on their behalf.
According to commissioners, the FCC has the authority from Congress and the Constitution to strike down barriers to broadband investment and competition. And under Section 706 of the Communications Act, the commission may also actively promote broadband development, which the petitioners say is at stake over these laws.
In Tennessee, operators are forbidden from building high-capacity networks beyond a certain geographical point, which the petitioners say has prevented them from providing internet to under-served communities. In North Carolina, public broadband is forbidden from having prices lower than a private carrier plan. Other regulations, the petitioners say, give preference to those private companies, particularly Comcast and Verizon.
Observers note that if the proposal is approved, it would likely pave the way for future legal battles in at least 19 other states which have similar laws on the books. A win for municipal broadband operators in Tennessee and North Carolina would set an important precedent for cities in Texas, Florida, Arkansas, and Iowa, among others, where some laws outright prohibit municipalities from building their own internet, according to (pdf) consumer watchdog group Free Press.
President Barack Obama in January called for an end to those laws, saying they harm broadband competition and inhibit local communities from meeting the needs of their citizens. His announcement was hailed by advocates as a "great moment for the principal of local self-reliance."
Despite support from the White House, the FCC still faces some challenges in striking down those laws. Republicans in Congress introduced a net neutrality bill last month which, if passed, would forbid the FCC from reclassifying the internet as a public utility under Title II of the Communications Act, gutting the commission of its power over the broadband industry. And many in the GOP, including some of the FCC's own commissioners, like Ajit Pai, say Section 706 does not grant the agency the power to intervene in city and state jurisdictional conflict.
Still, consumer advocates are optimistic for improved regulation of broadband laws. "Supporting cities' ability to create their own high-speed networks is essential for our broadband future," said Free Press president Craig Aaron last month. "The industry's monopoly-minded efforts to regulate away competition are part of a long history of abusive policies that have left too many Americans stranded on the wrong side of the digital divide."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.