SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Persecuted New York Times journalist James Risen accused U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder of being the "nation's top censorship officer" in a searing rebuke to comments made by Holder on Tuesday that the way his department handled the case of the now-imprisoned CIA whistleblower Jeffrey Sterling should exemplify "how the Justice Department can proceed."
Holder made the comments at the National Press Club on Tuesday when answering a question about the DOJ's crackdown on leaks and whistleblowers. After years of doggedly pursuing Risen's testimony against Sterling, the DOJ finally dropped their case after Risen vowed he would go to jail rather than reveal his source. The prize-winning journalist has previously described the Obama administration as "the greatest enemy of press freedom in a generation."
"If you look at the last case involving Mr. Risen," Holder said, "the way in which that case was handled after the new policies were put in place [is] an example of how the Justice Department can proceed."
During his comments, Holder further argued that the Department of Justice has been lenient on government whistleblowers, despite the fact that his office under the Obama Administration has overseen more prosecution of such leaks under the Espionage Act than every other administration combined.
"We have tried to be appropriately sensitive in bringing those cases that warranted prosecution," Holder said. "We have turned away, I mean, turned away substantially greater number of cases that were presented to us where prosecution was sought."
After the comments were made public, Risen took to Twitter and unleashed a series of comments exposing what he said was Holder's "true legacy on press freedom."
The episode concluded with Risen saying that he intends to spend the rest of his life "fighting to undo the damage done to press freedom" by Holder and President Barack Obama.
Risen was not alone in his response.
Trevor Timm, executive director of the Freedom of the Press Foundation, quipped: "New DOJ model: Harass and spy on journalist for years, make him spend a fortune in legal fees, drop case last second."
Later, in a lengthier post, Timm unpacked the Obama Administration's "deplorable" behavior on the case, concluding that the DOJ has "done damage to long term press freedom rights that will be very hard to undo, and the idea that this should be looked at as a 'model for future leak investigations' is troubling to say the least."
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Persecuted New York Times journalist James Risen accused U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder of being the "nation's top censorship officer" in a searing rebuke to comments made by Holder on Tuesday that the way his department handled the case of the now-imprisoned CIA whistleblower Jeffrey Sterling should exemplify "how the Justice Department can proceed."
Holder made the comments at the National Press Club on Tuesday when answering a question about the DOJ's crackdown on leaks and whistleblowers. After years of doggedly pursuing Risen's testimony against Sterling, the DOJ finally dropped their case after Risen vowed he would go to jail rather than reveal his source. The prize-winning journalist has previously described the Obama administration as "the greatest enemy of press freedom in a generation."
"If you look at the last case involving Mr. Risen," Holder said, "the way in which that case was handled after the new policies were put in place [is] an example of how the Justice Department can proceed."
During his comments, Holder further argued that the Department of Justice has been lenient on government whistleblowers, despite the fact that his office under the Obama Administration has overseen more prosecution of such leaks under the Espionage Act than every other administration combined.
"We have tried to be appropriately sensitive in bringing those cases that warranted prosecution," Holder said. "We have turned away, I mean, turned away substantially greater number of cases that were presented to us where prosecution was sought."
After the comments were made public, Risen took to Twitter and unleashed a series of comments exposing what he said was Holder's "true legacy on press freedom."
The episode concluded with Risen saying that he intends to spend the rest of his life "fighting to undo the damage done to press freedom" by Holder and President Barack Obama.
Risen was not alone in his response.
Trevor Timm, executive director of the Freedom of the Press Foundation, quipped: "New DOJ model: Harass and spy on journalist for years, make him spend a fortune in legal fees, drop case last second."
Later, in a lengthier post, Timm unpacked the Obama Administration's "deplorable" behavior on the case, concluding that the DOJ has "done damage to long term press freedom rights that will be very hard to undo, and the idea that this should be looked at as a 'model for future leak investigations' is troubling to say the least."
Persecuted New York Times journalist James Risen accused U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder of being the "nation's top censorship officer" in a searing rebuke to comments made by Holder on Tuesday that the way his department handled the case of the now-imprisoned CIA whistleblower Jeffrey Sterling should exemplify "how the Justice Department can proceed."
Holder made the comments at the National Press Club on Tuesday when answering a question about the DOJ's crackdown on leaks and whistleblowers. After years of doggedly pursuing Risen's testimony against Sterling, the DOJ finally dropped their case after Risen vowed he would go to jail rather than reveal his source. The prize-winning journalist has previously described the Obama administration as "the greatest enemy of press freedom in a generation."
"If you look at the last case involving Mr. Risen," Holder said, "the way in which that case was handled after the new policies were put in place [is] an example of how the Justice Department can proceed."
During his comments, Holder further argued that the Department of Justice has been lenient on government whistleblowers, despite the fact that his office under the Obama Administration has overseen more prosecution of such leaks under the Espionage Act than every other administration combined.
"We have tried to be appropriately sensitive in bringing those cases that warranted prosecution," Holder said. "We have turned away, I mean, turned away substantially greater number of cases that were presented to us where prosecution was sought."
After the comments were made public, Risen took to Twitter and unleashed a series of comments exposing what he said was Holder's "true legacy on press freedom."
The episode concluded with Risen saying that he intends to spend the rest of his life "fighting to undo the damage done to press freedom" by Holder and President Barack Obama.
Risen was not alone in his response.
Trevor Timm, executive director of the Freedom of the Press Foundation, quipped: "New DOJ model: Harass and spy on journalist for years, make him spend a fortune in legal fees, drop case last second."
Later, in a lengthier post, Timm unpacked the Obama Administration's "deplorable" behavior on the case, concluding that the DOJ has "done damage to long term press freedom rights that will be very hard to undo, and the idea that this should be looked at as a 'model for future leak investigations' is troubling to say the least."