SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Parliament Hill in Ottawa. (Photo: Paolo Ferrarini/flickr/cc)
'Excessive and Unprecedented': Privacy Commissioner Sounds Alarm on Sweeping Anti-Terrorism Legislation
'In a country governed by the rule of law, it should not be left for national security and other government agencies to determine the limits of their own powers.'—Daniel Therrien
Mar 06, 2015
Canada's Privacy Commissioner has criticized proposed anti-terrorism legislation for affording government "excessive" powers to sweep up information from all Canadians with neither due oversight nor the necessary privacy safeguards.
The legislation, Bill C-51, was introduced in January and has been met with fierce criticism by those who say it was introduced through fear-mongering, threatens to chill legitimate political speech and will face limited debate.
In his op-ed published Friday, Commissioner Daniel Therrien writes the the bill "does not strike the right balance" between privacy and security.
"The scale of information sharing between government departments and agencies being proposed in this bill is unprecedented. The new powers that would be created are excessive and the privacy safeguards being proposed are seriously deficient," he writes.
"The Bill would provide 17 federal government agencies with almost limitless powers to monitor and profile ordinary Canadians," 14 of which face no independent oversight.
He adds that "history has shown us that serious human rights abuses can occur in the name of national security," citing NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden's revelations as well as a commission that found "national security information sharing led to the torture of Syrian-Canadian Maher Arar."
"Significant changes" are needed to the bill, Therrien writes, including the creation of review bodies "to ensure appropriate oversight" and judicial recourse for those who feel their information was obtained or used improperly.
"In a country governed by the rule of law, it should not be left for national security and other government agencies to determine the limits of their own powers," he adds.
Therrien's op-ed comes the same week as Snowden said that Canada's intelligence agencies were subjected to the "weakest oversight" in the Western world.
Opponents of the legislation are holding a day of action on March 14 to highlight what they say is a "reckless, dangerous, and ineffective" bill.
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Canada's Privacy Commissioner has criticized proposed anti-terrorism legislation for affording government "excessive" powers to sweep up information from all Canadians with neither due oversight nor the necessary privacy safeguards.
The legislation, Bill C-51, was introduced in January and has been met with fierce criticism by those who say it was introduced through fear-mongering, threatens to chill legitimate political speech and will face limited debate.
In his op-ed published Friday, Commissioner Daniel Therrien writes the the bill "does not strike the right balance" between privacy and security.
"The scale of information sharing between government departments and agencies being proposed in this bill is unprecedented. The new powers that would be created are excessive and the privacy safeguards being proposed are seriously deficient," he writes.
"The Bill would provide 17 federal government agencies with almost limitless powers to monitor and profile ordinary Canadians," 14 of which face no independent oversight.
He adds that "history has shown us that serious human rights abuses can occur in the name of national security," citing NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden's revelations as well as a commission that found "national security information sharing led to the torture of Syrian-Canadian Maher Arar."
"Significant changes" are needed to the bill, Therrien writes, including the creation of review bodies "to ensure appropriate oversight" and judicial recourse for those who feel their information was obtained or used improperly.
"In a country governed by the rule of law, it should not be left for national security and other government agencies to determine the limits of their own powers," he adds.
Therrien's op-ed comes the same week as Snowden said that Canada's intelligence agencies were subjected to the "weakest oversight" in the Western world.
Opponents of the legislation are holding a day of action on March 14 to highlight what they say is a "reckless, dangerous, and ineffective" bill.
Canada's Privacy Commissioner has criticized proposed anti-terrorism legislation for affording government "excessive" powers to sweep up information from all Canadians with neither due oversight nor the necessary privacy safeguards.
The legislation, Bill C-51, was introduced in January and has been met with fierce criticism by those who say it was introduced through fear-mongering, threatens to chill legitimate political speech and will face limited debate.
In his op-ed published Friday, Commissioner Daniel Therrien writes the the bill "does not strike the right balance" between privacy and security.
"The scale of information sharing between government departments and agencies being proposed in this bill is unprecedented. The new powers that would be created are excessive and the privacy safeguards being proposed are seriously deficient," he writes.
"The Bill would provide 17 federal government agencies with almost limitless powers to monitor and profile ordinary Canadians," 14 of which face no independent oversight.
He adds that "history has shown us that serious human rights abuses can occur in the name of national security," citing NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden's revelations as well as a commission that found "national security information sharing led to the torture of Syrian-Canadian Maher Arar."
"Significant changes" are needed to the bill, Therrien writes, including the creation of review bodies "to ensure appropriate oversight" and judicial recourse for those who feel their information was obtained or used improperly.
"In a country governed by the rule of law, it should not be left for national security and other government agencies to determine the limits of their own powers," he adds.
Therrien's op-ed comes the same week as Snowden said that Canada's intelligence agencies were subjected to the "weakest oversight" in the Western world.
Opponents of the legislation are holding a day of action on March 14 to highlight what they say is a "reckless, dangerous, and ineffective" bill.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.