Israeli Minister of Intelligence Yuval Steinitz. (Photo: DFATD-MAECD/cc/flickr)
Apr 06, 2015
In a last ditch effort to undercut a framework agreement between world powers and Iran, a top aide to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu claimed on Monday that, regardless of the diplomatic process, military action against Iran is "still on the table."
Yuval Steinitz, Likud Party minister for strategic affairs, told reporters that Israel is still unilaterally weighing the "military option."
"It was on the table. It's still on the table. It's going to remain on the table," said Steinitz. "Israel should be able to defend itself, by itself, against any threat. And it's our right and duty to decide how to defend ourselves, especially if our national security and even very existence is under threat."
"We are going to make an additional effort to convince the U.S. administration, Congress, Britain, France and Russia not to sign this bad deal, or at least to dramatically change and fix it," added Steinitz.
Netanyahu's administration, along with hardline allies in U.S. Congress, has vigorously opposed the ongoing nuclear talks between Iran and the five members of the United Nations Security Council (U.S., Russia, China, United Kingdom, and France) plus Germany.
Advocates of the nuclear talks--from the administration of President Barack Obama to grassroots civil society organizations--say that the push to undermine the diplomatic process, ultimately, amounts to a call for dangerous military escalation and potentially war.
Leading nuclear non-proliferation specialists, meanwhile, released a statement on Monday championing the framework agreement as a "vitally important step forward."
Jamal Abdi, policy director for the National Iranian American Council, told Common Dreams, "The notion that the military option is still on the table, first of all, ignores the fact that any military option makes an Iranian nuclear weapon far more likely, not less likely. Anybody talking about military action is being disingenuous or just desperate and reckless."
"Some of our own members of the U.S. Senate are goading Israelis to say things like this," Abdi added. "Hopefully these people don't do more and more crazy things to sabotage the more desperate they get."
On January 20th, it begins...
Political revenge. Mass deportations. Project 2025. Unfathomable corruption. Attacks on Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid. Pardons for insurrectionists. An all-out assault on democracy. Republicans in Congress are scrambling to give Trump broad new powers to strip the tax-exempt status of any nonprofit he doesn’t like by declaring it a “terrorist-supporting organization.” Trump has already begun filing lawsuits against news outlets that criticize him. At Common Dreams, we won’t back down, but we must get ready for whatever Trump and his thugs throw at us. Our Year-End campaign is our most important fundraiser of the year. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover issues the corporate media never will, but we can only continue with our readers’ support. By donating today, please help us fight the dangers of a second Trump presidency. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Sarah Lazare
Sarah Lazare was a staff writer for Common Dreams from 2013-2016. She is currently web editor and reporter for In These Times.
In a last ditch effort to undercut a framework agreement between world powers and Iran, a top aide to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu claimed on Monday that, regardless of the diplomatic process, military action against Iran is "still on the table."
Yuval Steinitz, Likud Party minister for strategic affairs, told reporters that Israel is still unilaterally weighing the "military option."
"It was on the table. It's still on the table. It's going to remain on the table," said Steinitz. "Israel should be able to defend itself, by itself, against any threat. And it's our right and duty to decide how to defend ourselves, especially if our national security and even very existence is under threat."
"We are going to make an additional effort to convince the U.S. administration, Congress, Britain, France and Russia not to sign this bad deal, or at least to dramatically change and fix it," added Steinitz.
Netanyahu's administration, along with hardline allies in U.S. Congress, has vigorously opposed the ongoing nuclear talks between Iran and the five members of the United Nations Security Council (U.S., Russia, China, United Kingdom, and France) plus Germany.
Advocates of the nuclear talks--from the administration of President Barack Obama to grassroots civil society organizations--say that the push to undermine the diplomatic process, ultimately, amounts to a call for dangerous military escalation and potentially war.
Leading nuclear non-proliferation specialists, meanwhile, released a statement on Monday championing the framework agreement as a "vitally important step forward."
Jamal Abdi, policy director for the National Iranian American Council, told Common Dreams, "The notion that the military option is still on the table, first of all, ignores the fact that any military option makes an Iranian nuclear weapon far more likely, not less likely. Anybody talking about military action is being disingenuous or just desperate and reckless."
"Some of our own members of the U.S. Senate are goading Israelis to say things like this," Abdi added. "Hopefully these people don't do more and more crazy things to sabotage the more desperate they get."
Sarah Lazare
Sarah Lazare was a staff writer for Common Dreams from 2013-2016. She is currently web editor and reporter for In These Times.
In a last ditch effort to undercut a framework agreement between world powers and Iran, a top aide to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu claimed on Monday that, regardless of the diplomatic process, military action against Iran is "still on the table."
Yuval Steinitz, Likud Party minister for strategic affairs, told reporters that Israel is still unilaterally weighing the "military option."
"It was on the table. It's still on the table. It's going to remain on the table," said Steinitz. "Israel should be able to defend itself, by itself, against any threat. And it's our right and duty to decide how to defend ourselves, especially if our national security and even very existence is under threat."
"We are going to make an additional effort to convince the U.S. administration, Congress, Britain, France and Russia not to sign this bad deal, or at least to dramatically change and fix it," added Steinitz.
Netanyahu's administration, along with hardline allies in U.S. Congress, has vigorously opposed the ongoing nuclear talks between Iran and the five members of the United Nations Security Council (U.S., Russia, China, United Kingdom, and France) plus Germany.
Advocates of the nuclear talks--from the administration of President Barack Obama to grassroots civil society organizations--say that the push to undermine the diplomatic process, ultimately, amounts to a call for dangerous military escalation and potentially war.
Leading nuclear non-proliferation specialists, meanwhile, released a statement on Monday championing the framework agreement as a "vitally important step forward."
Jamal Abdi, policy director for the National Iranian American Council, told Common Dreams, "The notion that the military option is still on the table, first of all, ignores the fact that any military option makes an Iranian nuclear weapon far more likely, not less likely. Anybody talking about military action is being disingenuous or just desperate and reckless."
"Some of our own members of the U.S. Senate are goading Israelis to say things like this," Abdi added. "Hopefully these people don't do more and more crazy things to sabotage the more desperate they get."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.