Nuke Experts Back Iran Deal, Call for Congressional Support
From a 'nuclear nonproliferation and security standpoint,' the framework agreement is 'a vitally important step forward,' says group of 30 nuclear scientists
As President Barack Obama and his aides attempt to sell the framework deal on Iran's nuclear program to members of Congress, and negotiators prepare for talks aimed at securing a more comprehensive deal with Tehran by June 30, foreign policy experts and nuclear scientists continue to herald the agreement as a "vitally important step forward" for non-proliferation and international security.
The Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPA) between Iran and the P5+1 nations, announced in Switzerland last week, "comprehensively addresses the key routes by which Iran could acquire material for nuclear weapons" and "reduces the likelihood of destabilizing nuclear weapons competition in the Middle East," according to a joint statement released Monday by a group of 30 leading nuclear non-proliferation specialists, primarily from the United States.
"The framework agreement announced by the P5+1 and Iran is--from a nuclear nonproliferation and security standpoint--a vitally important step forward," the statement reads. "When implemented, it will put in place an effective, verifiable, enforceable, long-term plan to guard against the possibility of a new nuclear-armed state in the Middle East."
Its signatories, who include former United Nations Ambassador Thomas R. Pickering and executive director of the Arms Control Association Daryl Kimball, urged negotiators and policymakers to "promptly finalize the remaining technical details."
Members of the Iran Project, a non-governmental entity dedicated to improving the relationship between the U.S. and Iranian governments, echoed that call in a separate statement also issued Monday.
Acknowledging that "important, difficult, and ambiguous issues still remain," the Iran Project said the JCPA achieved key U.S. objectives including a reduction and then a limit on Iran's stockpile of enriched uranium and "broad and sweeping inspections."
"In view of this hopeful progress, we call on the U.S. Congress to take no action that would impede further progress or undermine the American negotiators' efforts to complete the final comprehensive agreement on time," the statement reads. "The Congress should examine the announced framework, asking itself whether the potential for a comprehensive, verifiable accord is preferable to the current standoff with Iran or other alternatives as a means to ensure that Iran will not acquire a nuclear weapon."
A coalition of groups representing Arab Americans, Jewish Americans, and Iranian Americans added their voice to the mix as well.
"[W]e are especially cognizant of what this agreement may mean for the Middle East," reads a joint statement released Monday by the Arab American Institute, J Street, and the National Iranian American Council. "This deal may provide an important first step towards de-escalating regional tensions and pave the way for resolving the many conflicts that still persist. The lesson that we all must learn from these successful negotiations is that diplomacy works. This deal demonstrates that no disagreement should be so deeply entrenched that it cannot be resolved through the give and take of serious diplomacy."
Meanwhile, Win Without War's "No War With Iran" coalition compiled close to 20 newspaper editorials in support of the framework agreement.
Despite this outpouring of support, the deal still faces significant opposition from domestic and international players--as evidenced by Monday's news that a senior Israeli government minister had warned that taking military action against Iran's nuclear program was still an option.
We are at a crossroads
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. In a few short weeks, US voters will have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. Our Fall Campaign is underway, and we need your help. To power our newsroom through the rest of the year, we need to raise $125,000 by midnight on October 31. So if you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
As President Barack Obama and his aides attempt to sell the framework deal on Iran's nuclear program to members of Congress, and negotiators prepare for talks aimed at securing a more comprehensive deal with Tehran by June 30, foreign policy experts and nuclear scientists continue to herald the agreement as a "vitally important step forward" for non-proliferation and international security.
The Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPA) between Iran and the P5+1 nations, announced in Switzerland last week, "comprehensively addresses the key routes by which Iran could acquire material for nuclear weapons" and "reduces the likelihood of destabilizing nuclear weapons competition in the Middle East," according to a joint statement released Monday by a group of 30 leading nuclear non-proliferation specialists, primarily from the United States.
"The framework agreement announced by the P5+1 and Iran is--from a nuclear nonproliferation and security standpoint--a vitally important step forward," the statement reads. "When implemented, it will put in place an effective, verifiable, enforceable, long-term plan to guard against the possibility of a new nuclear-armed state in the Middle East."
Its signatories, who include former United Nations Ambassador Thomas R. Pickering and executive director of the Arms Control Association Daryl Kimball, urged negotiators and policymakers to "promptly finalize the remaining technical details."
Members of the Iran Project, a non-governmental entity dedicated to improving the relationship between the U.S. and Iranian governments, echoed that call in a separate statement also issued Monday.
Acknowledging that "important, difficult, and ambiguous issues still remain," the Iran Project said the JCPA achieved key U.S. objectives including a reduction and then a limit on Iran's stockpile of enriched uranium and "broad and sweeping inspections."
"In view of this hopeful progress, we call on the U.S. Congress to take no action that would impede further progress or undermine the American negotiators' efforts to complete the final comprehensive agreement on time," the statement reads. "The Congress should examine the announced framework, asking itself whether the potential for a comprehensive, verifiable accord is preferable to the current standoff with Iran or other alternatives as a means to ensure that Iran will not acquire a nuclear weapon."
A coalition of groups representing Arab Americans, Jewish Americans, and Iranian Americans added their voice to the mix as well.
"[W]e are especially cognizant of what this agreement may mean for the Middle East," reads a joint statement released Monday by the Arab American Institute, J Street, and the National Iranian American Council. "This deal may provide an important first step towards de-escalating regional tensions and pave the way for resolving the many conflicts that still persist. The lesson that we all must learn from these successful negotiations is that diplomacy works. This deal demonstrates that no disagreement should be so deeply entrenched that it cannot be resolved through the give and take of serious diplomacy."
Meanwhile, Win Without War's "No War With Iran" coalition compiled close to 20 newspaper editorials in support of the framework agreement.
Despite this outpouring of support, the deal still faces significant opposition from domestic and international players--as evidenced by Monday's news that a senior Israeli government minister had warned that taking military action against Iran's nuclear program was still an option.
As President Barack Obama and his aides attempt to sell the framework deal on Iran's nuclear program to members of Congress, and negotiators prepare for talks aimed at securing a more comprehensive deal with Tehran by June 30, foreign policy experts and nuclear scientists continue to herald the agreement as a "vitally important step forward" for non-proliferation and international security.
The Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPA) between Iran and the P5+1 nations, announced in Switzerland last week, "comprehensively addresses the key routes by which Iran could acquire material for nuclear weapons" and "reduces the likelihood of destabilizing nuclear weapons competition in the Middle East," according to a joint statement released Monday by a group of 30 leading nuclear non-proliferation specialists, primarily from the United States.
"The framework agreement announced by the P5+1 and Iran is--from a nuclear nonproliferation and security standpoint--a vitally important step forward," the statement reads. "When implemented, it will put in place an effective, verifiable, enforceable, long-term plan to guard against the possibility of a new nuclear-armed state in the Middle East."
Its signatories, who include former United Nations Ambassador Thomas R. Pickering and executive director of the Arms Control Association Daryl Kimball, urged negotiators and policymakers to "promptly finalize the remaining technical details."
Members of the Iran Project, a non-governmental entity dedicated to improving the relationship between the U.S. and Iranian governments, echoed that call in a separate statement also issued Monday.
Acknowledging that "important, difficult, and ambiguous issues still remain," the Iran Project said the JCPA achieved key U.S. objectives including a reduction and then a limit on Iran's stockpile of enriched uranium and "broad and sweeping inspections."
"In view of this hopeful progress, we call on the U.S. Congress to take no action that would impede further progress or undermine the American negotiators' efforts to complete the final comprehensive agreement on time," the statement reads. "The Congress should examine the announced framework, asking itself whether the potential for a comprehensive, verifiable accord is preferable to the current standoff with Iran or other alternatives as a means to ensure that Iran will not acquire a nuclear weapon."
A coalition of groups representing Arab Americans, Jewish Americans, and Iranian Americans added their voice to the mix as well.
"[W]e are especially cognizant of what this agreement may mean for the Middle East," reads a joint statement released Monday by the Arab American Institute, J Street, and the National Iranian American Council. "This deal may provide an important first step towards de-escalating regional tensions and pave the way for resolving the many conflicts that still persist. The lesson that we all must learn from these successful negotiations is that diplomacy works. This deal demonstrates that no disagreement should be so deeply entrenched that it cannot be resolved through the give and take of serious diplomacy."
Meanwhile, Win Without War's "No War With Iran" coalition compiled close to 20 newspaper editorials in support of the framework agreement.
Despite this outpouring of support, the deal still faces significant opposition from domestic and international players--as evidenced by Monday's news that a senior Israeli government minister had warned that taking military action against Iran's nuclear program was still an option.