
In California, cities will be ordered to cut back water usage, while the agriculture industry goes unregulated. (Photo: Don DeBold/flickr/cc)
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
In California, cities will be ordered to cut back water usage, while the agriculture industry goes unregulated. (Photo: Don DeBold/flickr/cc)
For the first time ever, California's state water board on Wednesday approved mandatory water conservation rules in the face of a historic drought, now entering its fourth year. But the regulations, which will require water usage cutbacks of up to 36 percent for some communities, are letting the worst environmental offender in the state--the agriculture industry--off the hook.
"It's a double-standard. It's not going to be adequate to fix our water management problems," Adam Scow, California director of Food & Water Watch, told Common Dreams. "Overall, our state has failed to properly manage our water rights."
Agriculture accounts for roughly 80 percent of human-related water consumption in the state. Much of that comes from large-scale farms in California pumping billions of gallons a year of fresh groundwater to keep producing thirsty crops and animal products for supermarkets across the country--a "case study in the unwise use of natural resources," the New York Timeswrote last month.
Meanwhile, cities and water agencies will be required to implement 4 to 36 percent cutbacks, depending on the area. San Francisco must reduce its usage by 8 percent, Los Angeles by 16 percent, San Jose by 20 percent, and Sacramento by 28 percent. Failure to meet those targets could result in fines against water agencies of up to $10,000 a day. State legal advisers will review the rules before they are implemented.
While some cutbacks from cities and consumers are welcome, the government and the water board must "come to grips with the fact that in the bigger picture.... 80 percent of water goes to subsidized agriculture and irrigation, and there are a lot of things being grown in places where they shouldn't be grown when you're in a water-restricted state," Trent Orr, an attorney with environmental legal nonprofit Earthjustice, told Common Dreams. "This is the time that we hope the state government steps up and realizes it has to do something other than fiddling around the edges."
The California Water Resources Control Board adopted the emergency regulations in response to Governor Jerry Brown's mandate, issued in late April, calling for statewide rationing amid the drought he described as "unprecedented in recorded history."
However, as Scow explained, California's powerful agriculture industry seems to have gotten a free pass shortly after key lobbyists met with state government staff members last month.
As Orr states, "while agriculture makes up about 2 percent of the state's economy, it has tremendous political clout. It's time to take them on."
"We're not gonna get out of this problem unless we really seriously take a look at how water is allocated to agriculture in California," Orr said. "It's time to change the game somewhat so it's more rational."
The government must start regulating industrial farms, particularly in their use of groundwater--a "savings account" of fresh water, Scow said. "They're pumping it out much faster than nature can replenish it... We're calling on the government and the water board to practice real law enforcement. They haven't been doing their job."
Short-term water regulations targeting consumer usage won't be enough to address the drought, particularly because the water management problems in the state were building long before the crisis, Scow said. "It's a growing problem that has been really exposed with the drought."
The California Water Resources Control Board did not respond to request for comment.
Donald Trump’s attacks on democracy, justice, and a free press are escalating — putting everything we stand for at risk. We believe a better world is possible, but we can’t get there without your support. Common Dreams stands apart. We answer only to you — our readers, activists, and changemakers — not to billionaires or corporations. Our independence allows us to cover the vital stories that others won’t, spotlighting movements for peace, equality, and human rights. Right now, our work faces unprecedented challenges. Misinformation is spreading, journalists are under attack, and financial pressures are mounting. As a reader-supported, nonprofit newsroom, your support is crucial to keep this journalism alive. Whatever you can give — $10, $25, or $100 — helps us stay strong and responsive when the world needs us most. Together, we’ll continue to build the independent, courageous journalism our movement relies on. Thank you for being part of this community. |
For the first time ever, California's state water board on Wednesday approved mandatory water conservation rules in the face of a historic drought, now entering its fourth year. But the regulations, which will require water usage cutbacks of up to 36 percent for some communities, are letting the worst environmental offender in the state--the agriculture industry--off the hook.
"It's a double-standard. It's not going to be adequate to fix our water management problems," Adam Scow, California director of Food & Water Watch, told Common Dreams. "Overall, our state has failed to properly manage our water rights."
Agriculture accounts for roughly 80 percent of human-related water consumption in the state. Much of that comes from large-scale farms in California pumping billions of gallons a year of fresh groundwater to keep producing thirsty crops and animal products for supermarkets across the country--a "case study in the unwise use of natural resources," the New York Timeswrote last month.
Meanwhile, cities and water agencies will be required to implement 4 to 36 percent cutbacks, depending on the area. San Francisco must reduce its usage by 8 percent, Los Angeles by 16 percent, San Jose by 20 percent, and Sacramento by 28 percent. Failure to meet those targets could result in fines against water agencies of up to $10,000 a day. State legal advisers will review the rules before they are implemented.
While some cutbacks from cities and consumers are welcome, the government and the water board must "come to grips with the fact that in the bigger picture.... 80 percent of water goes to subsidized agriculture and irrigation, and there are a lot of things being grown in places where they shouldn't be grown when you're in a water-restricted state," Trent Orr, an attorney with environmental legal nonprofit Earthjustice, told Common Dreams. "This is the time that we hope the state government steps up and realizes it has to do something other than fiddling around the edges."
The California Water Resources Control Board adopted the emergency regulations in response to Governor Jerry Brown's mandate, issued in late April, calling for statewide rationing amid the drought he described as "unprecedented in recorded history."
However, as Scow explained, California's powerful agriculture industry seems to have gotten a free pass shortly after key lobbyists met with state government staff members last month.
As Orr states, "while agriculture makes up about 2 percent of the state's economy, it has tremendous political clout. It's time to take them on."
"We're not gonna get out of this problem unless we really seriously take a look at how water is allocated to agriculture in California," Orr said. "It's time to change the game somewhat so it's more rational."
The government must start regulating industrial farms, particularly in their use of groundwater--a "savings account" of fresh water, Scow said. "They're pumping it out much faster than nature can replenish it... We're calling on the government and the water board to practice real law enforcement. They haven't been doing their job."
Short-term water regulations targeting consumer usage won't be enough to address the drought, particularly because the water management problems in the state were building long before the crisis, Scow said. "It's a growing problem that has been really exposed with the drought."
The California Water Resources Control Board did not respond to request for comment.
For the first time ever, California's state water board on Wednesday approved mandatory water conservation rules in the face of a historic drought, now entering its fourth year. But the regulations, which will require water usage cutbacks of up to 36 percent for some communities, are letting the worst environmental offender in the state--the agriculture industry--off the hook.
"It's a double-standard. It's not going to be adequate to fix our water management problems," Adam Scow, California director of Food & Water Watch, told Common Dreams. "Overall, our state has failed to properly manage our water rights."
Agriculture accounts for roughly 80 percent of human-related water consumption in the state. Much of that comes from large-scale farms in California pumping billions of gallons a year of fresh groundwater to keep producing thirsty crops and animal products for supermarkets across the country--a "case study in the unwise use of natural resources," the New York Timeswrote last month.
Meanwhile, cities and water agencies will be required to implement 4 to 36 percent cutbacks, depending on the area. San Francisco must reduce its usage by 8 percent, Los Angeles by 16 percent, San Jose by 20 percent, and Sacramento by 28 percent. Failure to meet those targets could result in fines against water agencies of up to $10,000 a day. State legal advisers will review the rules before they are implemented.
While some cutbacks from cities and consumers are welcome, the government and the water board must "come to grips with the fact that in the bigger picture.... 80 percent of water goes to subsidized agriculture and irrigation, and there are a lot of things being grown in places where they shouldn't be grown when you're in a water-restricted state," Trent Orr, an attorney with environmental legal nonprofit Earthjustice, told Common Dreams. "This is the time that we hope the state government steps up and realizes it has to do something other than fiddling around the edges."
The California Water Resources Control Board adopted the emergency regulations in response to Governor Jerry Brown's mandate, issued in late April, calling for statewide rationing amid the drought he described as "unprecedented in recorded history."
However, as Scow explained, California's powerful agriculture industry seems to have gotten a free pass shortly after key lobbyists met with state government staff members last month.
As Orr states, "while agriculture makes up about 2 percent of the state's economy, it has tremendous political clout. It's time to take them on."
"We're not gonna get out of this problem unless we really seriously take a look at how water is allocated to agriculture in California," Orr said. "It's time to change the game somewhat so it's more rational."
The government must start regulating industrial farms, particularly in their use of groundwater--a "savings account" of fresh water, Scow said. "They're pumping it out much faster than nature can replenish it... We're calling on the government and the water board to practice real law enforcement. They haven't been doing their job."
Short-term water regulations targeting consumer usage won't be enough to address the drought, particularly because the water management problems in the state were building long before the crisis, Scow said. "It's a growing problem that has been really exposed with the drought."
The California Water Resources Control Board did not respond to request for comment.