SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
State-Mandated Malpractice? Doctors Fight Anti-Choice Law That 'Would Force Them to Lie'
New bill requires physicians to falsely tell patients medical abortions can be reversed
Jun 05, 2015
A group of Arizona health care providers launched a fight on Thursday to overturn a recently enacted, controversial bill that would require doctors to lie to their patients by telling them it is possible to reverse a medication-induced abortion.
In a lawsuit backed by the ACLU and the Center for Reproductive Rights, medical providers--including Planned Parenthood--charge that the new act is a "violation of medical ethics" and antithetical to informed consent, scientific integrity, and medicine itself.
Senate Bill 1318, which Governor Doug Doucey signed at the end of March, is slated to take effect in early July. In addition to banning insurers from covering most abortions in plans sold through federal healthcare exchanges under the Affordable Care Act, the legislation also requires doctors to tell patients seeking an abortion that it "may be possible to reverse the effects of a medication abortion if the woman changes her mind but that time is of the essence."
There is just one problem. There is no medically- or scientifically-accepted evidence to back up this allegation.
"Claims of medication abortion reversal are not supported by the body of scientific evidence, and this approach is not recommended in [American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists] clinical guidance on medication abortion," states the organization in a recent fact sheet about the Arizona bill. "There are no ACOG guidelines that support this course of action."
"This interferes with the doctor-patient relationship in terms of informed consent because it's important that we give scientifically accurate information that is appropriate to the standard of care."
--Julie Kwatra, American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
The requirement to share this false information, therefore, amounts to state-mandated medical malpractice, say providers.
"This is problematic on many levels," Julie Kwatra, an OBGYN and legislative chairwoman of the Arizona Section of the American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, told Common Dreams. "This interferes with the doctor-patient relationship in terms of informed consent because it's important that we give scientifically accurate information that is appropriate to the standard of care. This would be giving them the wrong information and anything that comes from a physician is going to sound like fact."
Cecile Richards, president of Planned Parenthood Federation of America, agreed. "This reckless law forces doctors to lie to their patients, and it puts women's health at risk," she declared in a press statement.
The groups behind the legislation, including the conservative lobbying organization Center for Arizona Policy, will "go to any means to eliminate abortion for all," said Kwatra. "I don't think they are very oriented on science or medicine, and I don't think they care. These same groups have tried to put forth laws that do not take into account the life of the mother."
"This reckless law forces doctors to lie to their patients, and it puts women's health at risk." --Cecile Richards, Planned Parenthood
The law is not limited to the state: it has been pushed nationally by the group Americans United for Life, and some warn this and similar acts could constitute the next front in the state-level attack on reproductive rights.
The recently passed bill is part of a years-long state-level legislative effort to chip away at reproductive rights in Arizona--efforts that have been fastidiously challenged, sometimes successfully, by reproductive justice advocates and health care providers.
Andrew Beck of Reproductive Freedom Project pointed out in a blog post that the legislation is "just one of a profusion of recent bills based on politics, not medicine, which are aimed at preventing women from getting an abortion or shaming and humiliating them if they do. In the first quarter of 2015 alone, more than 330 abortion restrictions were introduced in 43 states."
The law moves forward despite a recent poll which found that the overwhelming majority of people in the United States believe that an abortion experience should be "informed by medically accurate information."
"This is not just an Arizona issue," said Kwatra. "Other states have passed this legislation, and this is being fought on a national level. I hope we set a precedent in Arizona by having this law overturned."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Sarah Lazare
Sarah Lazare is the editor of Workday Magazine and a contributing editor for In These Times. She is a former Staff Writer at Common Dreams. She comes from a background in independent journalism for publications including The Intercept, The Nation, and Tom Dispatch.
A group of Arizona health care providers launched a fight on Thursday to overturn a recently enacted, controversial bill that would require doctors to lie to their patients by telling them it is possible to reverse a medication-induced abortion.
In a lawsuit backed by the ACLU and the Center for Reproductive Rights, medical providers--including Planned Parenthood--charge that the new act is a "violation of medical ethics" and antithetical to informed consent, scientific integrity, and medicine itself.
Senate Bill 1318, which Governor Doug Doucey signed at the end of March, is slated to take effect in early July. In addition to banning insurers from covering most abortions in plans sold through federal healthcare exchanges under the Affordable Care Act, the legislation also requires doctors to tell patients seeking an abortion that it "may be possible to reverse the effects of a medication abortion if the woman changes her mind but that time is of the essence."
There is just one problem. There is no medically- or scientifically-accepted evidence to back up this allegation.
"Claims of medication abortion reversal are not supported by the body of scientific evidence, and this approach is not recommended in [American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists] clinical guidance on medication abortion," states the organization in a recent fact sheet about the Arizona bill. "There are no ACOG guidelines that support this course of action."
"This interferes with the doctor-patient relationship in terms of informed consent because it's important that we give scientifically accurate information that is appropriate to the standard of care."
--Julie Kwatra, American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
The requirement to share this false information, therefore, amounts to state-mandated medical malpractice, say providers.
"This is problematic on many levels," Julie Kwatra, an OBGYN and legislative chairwoman of the Arizona Section of the American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, told Common Dreams. "This interferes with the doctor-patient relationship in terms of informed consent because it's important that we give scientifically accurate information that is appropriate to the standard of care. This would be giving them the wrong information and anything that comes from a physician is going to sound like fact."
Cecile Richards, president of Planned Parenthood Federation of America, agreed. "This reckless law forces doctors to lie to their patients, and it puts women's health at risk," she declared in a press statement.
The groups behind the legislation, including the conservative lobbying organization Center for Arizona Policy, will "go to any means to eliminate abortion for all," said Kwatra. "I don't think they are very oriented on science or medicine, and I don't think they care. These same groups have tried to put forth laws that do not take into account the life of the mother."
"This reckless law forces doctors to lie to their patients, and it puts women's health at risk." --Cecile Richards, Planned Parenthood
The law is not limited to the state: it has been pushed nationally by the group Americans United for Life, and some warn this and similar acts could constitute the next front in the state-level attack on reproductive rights.
The recently passed bill is part of a years-long state-level legislative effort to chip away at reproductive rights in Arizona--efforts that have been fastidiously challenged, sometimes successfully, by reproductive justice advocates and health care providers.
Andrew Beck of Reproductive Freedom Project pointed out in a blog post that the legislation is "just one of a profusion of recent bills based on politics, not medicine, which are aimed at preventing women from getting an abortion or shaming and humiliating them if they do. In the first quarter of 2015 alone, more than 330 abortion restrictions were introduced in 43 states."
The law moves forward despite a recent poll which found that the overwhelming majority of people in the United States believe that an abortion experience should be "informed by medically accurate information."
"This is not just an Arizona issue," said Kwatra. "Other states have passed this legislation, and this is being fought on a national level. I hope we set a precedent in Arizona by having this law overturned."
Sarah Lazare
Sarah Lazare is the editor of Workday Magazine and a contributing editor for In These Times. She is a former Staff Writer at Common Dreams. She comes from a background in independent journalism for publications including The Intercept, The Nation, and Tom Dispatch.
A group of Arizona health care providers launched a fight on Thursday to overturn a recently enacted, controversial bill that would require doctors to lie to their patients by telling them it is possible to reverse a medication-induced abortion.
In a lawsuit backed by the ACLU and the Center for Reproductive Rights, medical providers--including Planned Parenthood--charge that the new act is a "violation of medical ethics" and antithetical to informed consent, scientific integrity, and medicine itself.
Senate Bill 1318, which Governor Doug Doucey signed at the end of March, is slated to take effect in early July. In addition to banning insurers from covering most abortions in plans sold through federal healthcare exchanges under the Affordable Care Act, the legislation also requires doctors to tell patients seeking an abortion that it "may be possible to reverse the effects of a medication abortion if the woman changes her mind but that time is of the essence."
There is just one problem. There is no medically- or scientifically-accepted evidence to back up this allegation.
"Claims of medication abortion reversal are not supported by the body of scientific evidence, and this approach is not recommended in [American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists] clinical guidance on medication abortion," states the organization in a recent fact sheet about the Arizona bill. "There are no ACOG guidelines that support this course of action."
"This interferes with the doctor-patient relationship in terms of informed consent because it's important that we give scientifically accurate information that is appropriate to the standard of care."
--Julie Kwatra, American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
The requirement to share this false information, therefore, amounts to state-mandated medical malpractice, say providers.
"This is problematic on many levels," Julie Kwatra, an OBGYN and legislative chairwoman of the Arizona Section of the American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, told Common Dreams. "This interferes with the doctor-patient relationship in terms of informed consent because it's important that we give scientifically accurate information that is appropriate to the standard of care. This would be giving them the wrong information and anything that comes from a physician is going to sound like fact."
Cecile Richards, president of Planned Parenthood Federation of America, agreed. "This reckless law forces doctors to lie to their patients, and it puts women's health at risk," she declared in a press statement.
The groups behind the legislation, including the conservative lobbying organization Center for Arizona Policy, will "go to any means to eliminate abortion for all," said Kwatra. "I don't think they are very oriented on science or medicine, and I don't think they care. These same groups have tried to put forth laws that do not take into account the life of the mother."
"This reckless law forces doctors to lie to their patients, and it puts women's health at risk." --Cecile Richards, Planned Parenthood
The law is not limited to the state: it has been pushed nationally by the group Americans United for Life, and some warn this and similar acts could constitute the next front in the state-level attack on reproductive rights.
The recently passed bill is part of a years-long state-level legislative effort to chip away at reproductive rights in Arizona--efforts that have been fastidiously challenged, sometimes successfully, by reproductive justice advocates and health care providers.
Andrew Beck of Reproductive Freedom Project pointed out in a blog post that the legislation is "just one of a profusion of recent bills based on politics, not medicine, which are aimed at preventing women from getting an abortion or shaming and humiliating them if they do. In the first quarter of 2015 alone, more than 330 abortion restrictions were introduced in 43 states."
The law moves forward despite a recent poll which found that the overwhelming majority of people in the United States believe that an abortion experience should be "informed by medically accurate information."
"This is not just an Arizona issue," said Kwatra. "Other states have passed this legislation, and this is being fought on a national level. I hope we set a precedent in Arizona by having this law overturned."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.