SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Opening Historic 'Possibility of Peace,' World Powers Clinch Iran Deal
Grassroots groups and heads of state are calling for US Congress to approve agreement and reject war
Jul 14, 2015
Following years of arduous negotiations, and decades of hostile relations, Iran and world powers on Tuesday announced a nuclear agreement that proponents say provides a historic opening for military deescalation, relief from devastating sanctions, and ultimately, peace.
"This deal is a huge victory for diplomacy over war," Phyllis Bennis, senior fellow at the Institute for Policy Studies, told Common Dreams. "It prevents the very real threat of war with Iran but also, in the longer term, demonstrates the power and efficacy of diplomacy."
The accord culminates a marathon session of Vienna negotiations between Iran, the United States, Russia, China, United Kingdom, France, Germany, and the European Union.
The deal was met with praise by numerous heads of state. Iranian President Hassan Rohani said Tuesday that the agreement is proof that "constructive engagement works," adding that the deal halts "illegal" sanctions.
"Whatever problems there are in the global peace movement in recent years, this victory is very much tied to the building of an anti-war movement against the war in Iraq... This has made price of war higher than price of diplomacy, and that's the victory we're seeing today."
--Phyllis Bennis, Institute for Policy StudiesPresident Barack Obama praised the agreement and vowed to fight for Congress to pass it: "I will veto any legislation that prevents the successful implementation of this deal."
U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry said on Twitter, "This is the good deal we have sought," adding it is a step "towards possibility of peace."
And Russian President Vladimir Putin declared that the world has "heaved a sigh of relief."
Not everyone expressed enthusiasm. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who has vigorously opposed diplomacy and advocated war with Iran, denounced the agreement as a "historic mistake for the world."
Chair of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Bob Corker (R-Tenn.), also did not waste any time in casting doubt on the agreement, declaring: "In the coming days, Congress will need to scrutinize this deal and answer whether implementing the agreement is worth dismantling our painstakingly-constructed sanctions regime that took more than a decade to establish."
Under the deal, Iran will receive sanctions relief in exchange for limits to its domestic nuclear program. The White House fact sheet is available here.
"The agreement includes five major components," explained Peace Action, which has advocated for diplomacy, in a statement released Tuesday. "Decreasing the stockpile of material that could possibly be made into fissile material. Limiting the quantity and quality of centrifuges that could make highly enriched uranium needed for a nuclear bomb. Reconfiguring the nuclear reactor (and securing its spent fuel) in the city of Arak so it produces an insignificant amount of weapons grade plutonium. Implementing unprecedented inspections and comprehensive monitoring. And lastly, scheduling and implementing the lifting of specific sanctions on Iran."
Civil society organizations from around the world, including within Iran, have long pressed for diplomacy rather than military escalation and devastating sanctions.
"War would only make a future deal next to impossible, embroiling the U.S. and Iran in perpetual conflict. Some wanted to see that; we didn't."
--Trita Parsi, National Iranian American CouncilTrita Parsi, president of the National Iranian Ameican Council, on Tuesday heralded the deal as "the greatest achievement of the new millennium." Parsi added, "War would only make a future deal next to impossible, embroiling the U.S. and Iran in perpetual conflict. Some wanted to see that; we didn't."
Bennis emphasized: "Whatever problems there are in the global peace movement in recent years, this victory is very much tied to the building of an anti-war movement against the war in Iraq. The millions of people who flooded streets around the world on February 15, 2003 can claim this victory as their own. This has made price of war higher than price of diplomacy, and that's the victory we're seeing today."
However, Tuesday's announcement does not officially close the deal: it must still be approved by U.S. Congress, where it faces stiff opposition from hawkish lawmakers. To that end, U.S. groups including Just Foreign Policy, Win Without War, Peace Action, and Jewish Voice for Peace met the announcement with their own calls to action, declaring: Don't let U.S. lawmakers sabotage this chance for peace.
"This opportunity for the diplomatic process to succeed in avoiding war with Iran is too important to discard over partisan politics," said Rabbi Joseph Berman, government affairs liaison for Jewish Voice for Peace. "This is a strong deal and we urge our elected leaders to vote in favor of the agreement when it comes before Congress."
"Defend the Iran deal and stop Republicans from starting a war with Iran," reads a petition from groups including Just Foreign Policy and Code Pink. "We need to build an impenetrable firewall in Congress to prevent Republicans from passing any legislation to kill the deal and putting us back on the path to confrontation and war."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Sarah Lazare
Sarah Lazare is the editor of Workday Magazine and a contributing editor for In These Times. She is a former Staff Writer at Common Dreams. She comes from a background in independent journalism for publications including The Intercept, The Nation, and Tom Dispatch.
Following years of arduous negotiations, and decades of hostile relations, Iran and world powers on Tuesday announced a nuclear agreement that proponents say provides a historic opening for military deescalation, relief from devastating sanctions, and ultimately, peace.
"This deal is a huge victory for diplomacy over war," Phyllis Bennis, senior fellow at the Institute for Policy Studies, told Common Dreams. "It prevents the very real threat of war with Iran but also, in the longer term, demonstrates the power and efficacy of diplomacy."
The accord culminates a marathon session of Vienna negotiations between Iran, the United States, Russia, China, United Kingdom, France, Germany, and the European Union.
The deal was met with praise by numerous heads of state. Iranian President Hassan Rohani said Tuesday that the agreement is proof that "constructive engagement works," adding that the deal halts "illegal" sanctions.
"Whatever problems there are in the global peace movement in recent years, this victory is very much tied to the building of an anti-war movement against the war in Iraq... This has made price of war higher than price of diplomacy, and that's the victory we're seeing today."
--Phyllis Bennis, Institute for Policy StudiesPresident Barack Obama praised the agreement and vowed to fight for Congress to pass it: "I will veto any legislation that prevents the successful implementation of this deal."
U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry said on Twitter, "This is the good deal we have sought," adding it is a step "towards possibility of peace."
And Russian President Vladimir Putin declared that the world has "heaved a sigh of relief."
Not everyone expressed enthusiasm. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who has vigorously opposed diplomacy and advocated war with Iran, denounced the agreement as a "historic mistake for the world."
Chair of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Bob Corker (R-Tenn.), also did not waste any time in casting doubt on the agreement, declaring: "In the coming days, Congress will need to scrutinize this deal and answer whether implementing the agreement is worth dismantling our painstakingly-constructed sanctions regime that took more than a decade to establish."
Under the deal, Iran will receive sanctions relief in exchange for limits to its domestic nuclear program. The White House fact sheet is available here.
"The agreement includes five major components," explained Peace Action, which has advocated for diplomacy, in a statement released Tuesday. "Decreasing the stockpile of material that could possibly be made into fissile material. Limiting the quantity and quality of centrifuges that could make highly enriched uranium needed for a nuclear bomb. Reconfiguring the nuclear reactor (and securing its spent fuel) in the city of Arak so it produces an insignificant amount of weapons grade plutonium. Implementing unprecedented inspections and comprehensive monitoring. And lastly, scheduling and implementing the lifting of specific sanctions on Iran."
Civil society organizations from around the world, including within Iran, have long pressed for diplomacy rather than military escalation and devastating sanctions.
"War would only make a future deal next to impossible, embroiling the U.S. and Iran in perpetual conflict. Some wanted to see that; we didn't."
--Trita Parsi, National Iranian American CouncilTrita Parsi, president of the National Iranian Ameican Council, on Tuesday heralded the deal as "the greatest achievement of the new millennium." Parsi added, "War would only make a future deal next to impossible, embroiling the U.S. and Iran in perpetual conflict. Some wanted to see that; we didn't."
Bennis emphasized: "Whatever problems there are in the global peace movement in recent years, this victory is very much tied to the building of an anti-war movement against the war in Iraq. The millions of people who flooded streets around the world on February 15, 2003 can claim this victory as their own. This has made price of war higher than price of diplomacy, and that's the victory we're seeing today."
However, Tuesday's announcement does not officially close the deal: it must still be approved by U.S. Congress, where it faces stiff opposition from hawkish lawmakers. To that end, U.S. groups including Just Foreign Policy, Win Without War, Peace Action, and Jewish Voice for Peace met the announcement with their own calls to action, declaring: Don't let U.S. lawmakers sabotage this chance for peace.
"This opportunity for the diplomatic process to succeed in avoiding war with Iran is too important to discard over partisan politics," said Rabbi Joseph Berman, government affairs liaison for Jewish Voice for Peace. "This is a strong deal and we urge our elected leaders to vote in favor of the agreement when it comes before Congress."
"Defend the Iran deal and stop Republicans from starting a war with Iran," reads a petition from groups including Just Foreign Policy and Code Pink. "We need to build an impenetrable firewall in Congress to prevent Republicans from passing any legislation to kill the deal and putting us back on the path to confrontation and war."
Sarah Lazare
Sarah Lazare is the editor of Workday Magazine and a contributing editor for In These Times. She is a former Staff Writer at Common Dreams. She comes from a background in independent journalism for publications including The Intercept, The Nation, and Tom Dispatch.
Following years of arduous negotiations, and decades of hostile relations, Iran and world powers on Tuesday announced a nuclear agreement that proponents say provides a historic opening for military deescalation, relief from devastating sanctions, and ultimately, peace.
"This deal is a huge victory for diplomacy over war," Phyllis Bennis, senior fellow at the Institute for Policy Studies, told Common Dreams. "It prevents the very real threat of war with Iran but also, in the longer term, demonstrates the power and efficacy of diplomacy."
The accord culminates a marathon session of Vienna negotiations between Iran, the United States, Russia, China, United Kingdom, France, Germany, and the European Union.
The deal was met with praise by numerous heads of state. Iranian President Hassan Rohani said Tuesday that the agreement is proof that "constructive engagement works," adding that the deal halts "illegal" sanctions.
"Whatever problems there are in the global peace movement in recent years, this victory is very much tied to the building of an anti-war movement against the war in Iraq... This has made price of war higher than price of diplomacy, and that's the victory we're seeing today."
--Phyllis Bennis, Institute for Policy StudiesPresident Barack Obama praised the agreement and vowed to fight for Congress to pass it: "I will veto any legislation that prevents the successful implementation of this deal."
U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry said on Twitter, "This is the good deal we have sought," adding it is a step "towards possibility of peace."
And Russian President Vladimir Putin declared that the world has "heaved a sigh of relief."
Not everyone expressed enthusiasm. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who has vigorously opposed diplomacy and advocated war with Iran, denounced the agreement as a "historic mistake for the world."
Chair of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Bob Corker (R-Tenn.), also did not waste any time in casting doubt on the agreement, declaring: "In the coming days, Congress will need to scrutinize this deal and answer whether implementing the agreement is worth dismantling our painstakingly-constructed sanctions regime that took more than a decade to establish."
Under the deal, Iran will receive sanctions relief in exchange for limits to its domestic nuclear program. The White House fact sheet is available here.
"The agreement includes five major components," explained Peace Action, which has advocated for diplomacy, in a statement released Tuesday. "Decreasing the stockpile of material that could possibly be made into fissile material. Limiting the quantity and quality of centrifuges that could make highly enriched uranium needed for a nuclear bomb. Reconfiguring the nuclear reactor (and securing its spent fuel) in the city of Arak so it produces an insignificant amount of weapons grade plutonium. Implementing unprecedented inspections and comprehensive monitoring. And lastly, scheduling and implementing the lifting of specific sanctions on Iran."
Civil society organizations from around the world, including within Iran, have long pressed for diplomacy rather than military escalation and devastating sanctions.
"War would only make a future deal next to impossible, embroiling the U.S. and Iran in perpetual conflict. Some wanted to see that; we didn't."
--Trita Parsi, National Iranian American CouncilTrita Parsi, president of the National Iranian Ameican Council, on Tuesday heralded the deal as "the greatest achievement of the new millennium." Parsi added, "War would only make a future deal next to impossible, embroiling the U.S. and Iran in perpetual conflict. Some wanted to see that; we didn't."
Bennis emphasized: "Whatever problems there are in the global peace movement in recent years, this victory is very much tied to the building of an anti-war movement against the war in Iraq. The millions of people who flooded streets around the world on February 15, 2003 can claim this victory as their own. This has made price of war higher than price of diplomacy, and that's the victory we're seeing today."
However, Tuesday's announcement does not officially close the deal: it must still be approved by U.S. Congress, where it faces stiff opposition from hawkish lawmakers. To that end, U.S. groups including Just Foreign Policy, Win Without War, Peace Action, and Jewish Voice for Peace met the announcement with their own calls to action, declaring: Don't let U.S. lawmakers sabotage this chance for peace.
"This opportunity for the diplomatic process to succeed in avoiding war with Iran is too important to discard over partisan politics," said Rabbi Joseph Berman, government affairs liaison for Jewish Voice for Peace. "This is a strong deal and we urge our elected leaders to vote in favor of the agreement when it comes before Congress."
"Defend the Iran deal and stop Republicans from starting a war with Iran," reads a petition from groups including Just Foreign Policy and Code Pink. "We need to build an impenetrable firewall in Congress to prevent Republicans from passing any legislation to kill the deal and putting us back on the path to confrontation and war."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.