SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
A 2013 action in Jerusalem calling on Obama to reject Arctic drilling proposals.
"Alaskans are on the front lines of one of the greatest challenges we face this century: climate change," President Barack Obama said in a video posted on the White House website Thursday, announcing an upcoming trip to the state to highlight the global warming crisis. "Climate change once seemed like a problem for future generations. But for most Americans, it's already a reality."
The words are nice. However, some environmentalists have seized on the hypocrisy of Obama's rhetoric, given that he recently gave the final go-ahead for Royal Dutch Shell to drill for Arctic offshore oil in the Chukchi Sea near Alaska.
Climate activists and scientists alike have warned that Shell's spotty safety record, combined with carbon that would be unlocked through drilling and extraction, poses a severe danger to the ocean ecosystem, climate, and frontline communities.
Indeed, the prospect of drilling in the Arctic while promoting the need to protect it is "like shooting rhinos to save them," Ben Schreiber, climate and energy program director at Friends of the Earth, told the Huffington Post's Kate Sheppard.
Just yesterday, Oil Change International and Greenpeace released a report stating plainly that Arctic oil must stay in the ground to stave off "climate disaster." According to the assessment, Arctic drilling is "inconsistent" with efforts to keep global warming to less than 2 degrees Celsius. This finding echoed similar findings by other researchers.
"The bottom line is that there is no room for Arctic oil in a climate-safe world," OCI's Hannah McKinnon wrote. "By allowing Shell to drill in the U.S. offshore Arctic Ocean, the Obama Administration is ignoring the world's best scientists, as well as millions of concerned citizens in North America and beyond."
Bloomberg reported Friday that "Obama's trip has prompted concern among Alaska politicians that he may announce new executive actions on climate change while in the state."
"The president of the United States doesn't go to anybody's state and stay three days and not do something," Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska.) reportedly said at a breakfast with Bloomberg editors and reporters in Washington earlier this month.
"So this is the talk about town. 'Oh my gosh, what's he gonna do? Is he going to lock up ANWR?''" she said, using an acronym for the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. "'Is he going to put the Bering Sea canyons in as a marine protected sanctuary?' We don't have any idea."
But for now, the announcement merely underscores what climate activist and anti-capitalist Naomi Klein said of Obama on Democracy Now! last month: "He's doing a very good job of showing us what a climate leader sounds like," she told DN! host Amy Goodman. But I'm afraid we've got a long way to go before we see what a climate leader acts like."
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
"Alaskans are on the front lines of one of the greatest challenges we face this century: climate change," President Barack Obama said in a video posted on the White House website Thursday, announcing an upcoming trip to the state to highlight the global warming crisis. "Climate change once seemed like a problem for future generations. But for most Americans, it's already a reality."
The words are nice. However, some environmentalists have seized on the hypocrisy of Obama's rhetoric, given that he recently gave the final go-ahead for Royal Dutch Shell to drill for Arctic offshore oil in the Chukchi Sea near Alaska.
Climate activists and scientists alike have warned that Shell's spotty safety record, combined with carbon that would be unlocked through drilling and extraction, poses a severe danger to the ocean ecosystem, climate, and frontline communities.
Indeed, the prospect of drilling in the Arctic while promoting the need to protect it is "like shooting rhinos to save them," Ben Schreiber, climate and energy program director at Friends of the Earth, told the Huffington Post's Kate Sheppard.
Just yesterday, Oil Change International and Greenpeace released a report stating plainly that Arctic oil must stay in the ground to stave off "climate disaster." According to the assessment, Arctic drilling is "inconsistent" with efforts to keep global warming to less than 2 degrees Celsius. This finding echoed similar findings by other researchers.
"The bottom line is that there is no room for Arctic oil in a climate-safe world," OCI's Hannah McKinnon wrote. "By allowing Shell to drill in the U.S. offshore Arctic Ocean, the Obama Administration is ignoring the world's best scientists, as well as millions of concerned citizens in North America and beyond."
Bloomberg reported Friday that "Obama's trip has prompted concern among Alaska politicians that he may announce new executive actions on climate change while in the state."
"The president of the United States doesn't go to anybody's state and stay three days and not do something," Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska.) reportedly said at a breakfast with Bloomberg editors and reporters in Washington earlier this month.
"So this is the talk about town. 'Oh my gosh, what's he gonna do? Is he going to lock up ANWR?''" she said, using an acronym for the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. "'Is he going to put the Bering Sea canyons in as a marine protected sanctuary?' We don't have any idea."
But for now, the announcement merely underscores what climate activist and anti-capitalist Naomi Klein said of Obama on Democracy Now! last month: "He's doing a very good job of showing us what a climate leader sounds like," she told DN! host Amy Goodman. But I'm afraid we've got a long way to go before we see what a climate leader acts like."
"Alaskans are on the front lines of one of the greatest challenges we face this century: climate change," President Barack Obama said in a video posted on the White House website Thursday, announcing an upcoming trip to the state to highlight the global warming crisis. "Climate change once seemed like a problem for future generations. But for most Americans, it's already a reality."
The words are nice. However, some environmentalists have seized on the hypocrisy of Obama's rhetoric, given that he recently gave the final go-ahead for Royal Dutch Shell to drill for Arctic offshore oil in the Chukchi Sea near Alaska.
Climate activists and scientists alike have warned that Shell's spotty safety record, combined with carbon that would be unlocked through drilling and extraction, poses a severe danger to the ocean ecosystem, climate, and frontline communities.
Indeed, the prospect of drilling in the Arctic while promoting the need to protect it is "like shooting rhinos to save them," Ben Schreiber, climate and energy program director at Friends of the Earth, told the Huffington Post's Kate Sheppard.
Just yesterday, Oil Change International and Greenpeace released a report stating plainly that Arctic oil must stay in the ground to stave off "climate disaster." According to the assessment, Arctic drilling is "inconsistent" with efforts to keep global warming to less than 2 degrees Celsius. This finding echoed similar findings by other researchers.
"The bottom line is that there is no room for Arctic oil in a climate-safe world," OCI's Hannah McKinnon wrote. "By allowing Shell to drill in the U.S. offshore Arctic Ocean, the Obama Administration is ignoring the world's best scientists, as well as millions of concerned citizens in North America and beyond."
Bloomberg reported Friday that "Obama's trip has prompted concern among Alaska politicians that he may announce new executive actions on climate change while in the state."
"The president of the United States doesn't go to anybody's state and stay three days and not do something," Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska.) reportedly said at a breakfast with Bloomberg editors and reporters in Washington earlier this month.
"So this is the talk about town. 'Oh my gosh, what's he gonna do? Is he going to lock up ANWR?''" she said, using an acronym for the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. "'Is he going to put the Bering Sea canyons in as a marine protected sanctuary?' We don't have any idea."
But for now, the announcement merely underscores what climate activist and anti-capitalist Naomi Klein said of Obama on Democracy Now! last month: "He's doing a very good job of showing us what a climate leader sounds like," she told DN! host Amy Goodman. But I'm afraid we've got a long way to go before we see what a climate leader acts like."