SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
"The lengthy list of policy riders included in pending appropriations bills represents Washington at its worst," said Robert Weissman, president of Public Citizen. "Stealthy, out-of-order maneuvers are used to force through unpopular legislative provisions, imposing enormous harm on the American public to benefit corporate donors." (Photo: Speaker John Boehner/flickr/cc)
Get Your Ideology Out of Federal Budget, 178 Groups Say to Congress
'With hundreds of outrageous policy riders, the 2016 appropriations bills look more like a Christmas wish list for big business than a serious federal budget,' says Public Citizen
Sep 10, 2015
Citing a lengthy list of "wildly inappropriate" provisions that have been attached to pending U.S. budget proposals, a coalition of 178 groups representing tens of millions of Americans is calling on President Barack Obama and Congress to oppose any federal appropriations bills that include "ideological" policy riders.
In a letter (pdf) sent Thursday to Obama and members of Congress, the organizations charge lawmakers with inserting controversial and unpopular measures--ones with "little or no connection to funding the government"--into must-pass legislation in order "to serve the narrow interests of particular industries at the expense of public health, safety, workers' rights, financial security, science, and the environment."
The missive, which is signed by a wide range of groups including Greenpeace, NAACP, National Organization for Women, Public Citizen, and United Steelworkers, describes such riders as "the new earmarks," but notes they are even worse in that "they have vastly greater reach and consequence for the American people."
Many people are aware that the GOP is considering attaching a rider defunding Planned Parenthood to a government spending bill, despite the fact that the public opposes and Obama would veto such a measure.
But there are many more examples, including proposals that would:
- Prevent the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) from updating important air quality standards for ozone and roll back a recently finalized rule that protects clean water;
- Roll back strong net neutrality rules and prevent the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) from enforcing rules that ensure internet openness and affordability;
- Stop the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission from requiring publicly traded companies to disclose their political spending;
- Roll back financial regulations in areas ranging from protections against irresponsible mortgage lending to limits on excessive borrowing by large banks, to undermining the effectiveness of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB); and
- Eliminate any funding for the Title X Family Planning Program, cutting the preventive care--including family planning services, well-woman exams, lifesaving cancer screenings, birth control, and testing and treatments for sexually transmitted infections--that nearly 4.6 million people currently rely on.
"With hundreds of outrageous policy riders, the 2016 appropriations bills look more like a Christmas wish list for big business than a serious federal budget," said Lisa Gilbert, director of Public Citizen's Congress Watch division. "These riders are designed to do one thing: hijack the budget process to roll back basic protections for Main Street."
An Unconstitutional Rampage
Trump and Musk are on an unconstitutional rampage, aiming for virtually every corner of the federal government. These two right-wing billionaires are targeting nurses, scientists, teachers, daycare providers, judges, veterans, air traffic controllers, and nuclear safety inspectors. No one is safe. The food stamps program, Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid are next. It’s an unprecedented disaster and a five-alarm fire, but there will be a reckoning. The people did not vote for this. The American people do not want this dystopian hellscape that hides behind claims of “efficiency.” Still, in reality, it is all a giveaway to corporate interests and the libertarian dreams of far-right oligarchs like Musk. Common Dreams is playing a vital role by reporting day and night on this orgy of corruption and greed, as well as what everyday people can do to organize and fight back. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover issues the corporate media never will, but we can only continue with our readers’ support. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Deirdre Fulton
Deirdre Fulton is a former Common Dreams senior editor and staff writer. Previously she worked as an editor and writer for the Portland Phoenix and the Boston Phoenix, where she was honored by the New England Press Association and the Association of Alternative Newsweeklies. A Boston University graduate, Deirdre is a co-founder of the Maine-based Lorem Ipsum Theater Collective and the PortFringe theater festival. She writes young adult fiction in her spare time.
environmentfccgreenpeacelabornaacpnational organization for womenpublic citizenpublic healthrepublican partyus congressus houseus senatewomen
Citing a lengthy list of "wildly inappropriate" provisions that have been attached to pending U.S. budget proposals, a coalition of 178 groups representing tens of millions of Americans is calling on President Barack Obama and Congress to oppose any federal appropriations bills that include "ideological" policy riders.
In a letter (pdf) sent Thursday to Obama and members of Congress, the organizations charge lawmakers with inserting controversial and unpopular measures--ones with "little or no connection to funding the government"--into must-pass legislation in order "to serve the narrow interests of particular industries at the expense of public health, safety, workers' rights, financial security, science, and the environment."
The missive, which is signed by a wide range of groups including Greenpeace, NAACP, National Organization for Women, Public Citizen, and United Steelworkers, describes such riders as "the new earmarks," but notes they are even worse in that "they have vastly greater reach and consequence for the American people."
Many people are aware that the GOP is considering attaching a rider defunding Planned Parenthood to a government spending bill, despite the fact that the public opposes and Obama would veto such a measure.
But there are many more examples, including proposals that would:
- Prevent the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) from updating important air quality standards for ozone and roll back a recently finalized rule that protects clean water;
- Roll back strong net neutrality rules and prevent the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) from enforcing rules that ensure internet openness and affordability;
- Stop the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission from requiring publicly traded companies to disclose their political spending;
- Roll back financial regulations in areas ranging from protections against irresponsible mortgage lending to limits on excessive borrowing by large banks, to undermining the effectiveness of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB); and
- Eliminate any funding for the Title X Family Planning Program, cutting the preventive care--including family planning services, well-woman exams, lifesaving cancer screenings, birth control, and testing and treatments for sexually transmitted infections--that nearly 4.6 million people currently rely on.
"With hundreds of outrageous policy riders, the 2016 appropriations bills look more like a Christmas wish list for big business than a serious federal budget," said Lisa Gilbert, director of Public Citizen's Congress Watch division. "These riders are designed to do one thing: hijack the budget process to roll back basic protections for Main Street."
Deirdre Fulton
Deirdre Fulton is a former Common Dreams senior editor and staff writer. Previously she worked as an editor and writer for the Portland Phoenix and the Boston Phoenix, where she was honored by the New England Press Association and the Association of Alternative Newsweeklies. A Boston University graduate, Deirdre is a co-founder of the Maine-based Lorem Ipsum Theater Collective and the PortFringe theater festival. She writes young adult fiction in her spare time.
Citing a lengthy list of "wildly inappropriate" provisions that have been attached to pending U.S. budget proposals, a coalition of 178 groups representing tens of millions of Americans is calling on President Barack Obama and Congress to oppose any federal appropriations bills that include "ideological" policy riders.
In a letter (pdf) sent Thursday to Obama and members of Congress, the organizations charge lawmakers with inserting controversial and unpopular measures--ones with "little or no connection to funding the government"--into must-pass legislation in order "to serve the narrow interests of particular industries at the expense of public health, safety, workers' rights, financial security, science, and the environment."
The missive, which is signed by a wide range of groups including Greenpeace, NAACP, National Organization for Women, Public Citizen, and United Steelworkers, describes such riders as "the new earmarks," but notes they are even worse in that "they have vastly greater reach and consequence for the American people."
Many people are aware that the GOP is considering attaching a rider defunding Planned Parenthood to a government spending bill, despite the fact that the public opposes and Obama would veto such a measure.
But there are many more examples, including proposals that would:
- Prevent the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) from updating important air quality standards for ozone and roll back a recently finalized rule that protects clean water;
- Roll back strong net neutrality rules and prevent the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) from enforcing rules that ensure internet openness and affordability;
- Stop the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission from requiring publicly traded companies to disclose their political spending;
- Roll back financial regulations in areas ranging from protections against irresponsible mortgage lending to limits on excessive borrowing by large banks, to undermining the effectiveness of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB); and
- Eliminate any funding for the Title X Family Planning Program, cutting the preventive care--including family planning services, well-woman exams, lifesaving cancer screenings, birth control, and testing and treatments for sexually transmitted infections--that nearly 4.6 million people currently rely on.
"With hundreds of outrageous policy riders, the 2016 appropriations bills look more like a Christmas wish list for big business than a serious federal budget," said Lisa Gilbert, director of Public Citizen's Congress Watch division. "These riders are designed to do one thing: hijack the budget process to roll back basic protections for Main Street."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.