As Refugee Aid Falters, European Leaders Pursue Military Action at Sea
Led by Britain, European leaders ask United Nations Security Council to approve military targeting of 'human smugglers' along route from Libya
As their humanitarian response to the ongoing refugee crisis falters, European leaders are pressing the United Nations Security Council to authorized an escalated military force to pursue so-called "human smugglers" in the Mediterranean Sea's international waters.
The effort to advance the draft resolution is, according to Foreign Policy, being led by Britain, whose government has come under fire for "turning its back" on people seeking refuge from war and poverty.
Specifically, the plan would approve military action in international waters along a route from the coast of Libya to Italy, according to reports from the New York Times on the proposal, which will soon be circulated within the UNSC.
The route is commonly used to transport people fleeing West Africa, Eritrea, and Afghanistan, while Syrians are increasingly using a pathway that passes through Turkey. According to an unnamed Security Council diplomat quoted by The New York Times, the proposal stipulates for seized boats to be taken to Italy, where the refugees aboard would then be considered for asylum.
The plan is less severe than a previous proposal, circulated by Britain last spring, that would have allowed European military forces to pursue "human smugglers" in Libyan waters and even on the country's soil. Britain eventually abandoned the measure after failing to secure Libyan approval.
However, many have argued that military targeting of "smuggling" networks would neither deter nor help refugees, who undergo tremendous hardship and risk their lives in a bid to escape war and poverty. The UN refugee agency recently declared they do not expect the influx of refugees to Europe to slow.
Going further, many observers argue a military response is the polar opposite of the humanitarian response wealthy nations owe refugees. "A whole generation of people are putting themselves in debt to be smuggled into Europe, only to be thrown out," UN Special Rapporteur on the Human Rights of Migrants Francois Crepeau told Al Jazeera last month. "That is a really ridiculous transfer of wealth... We can help people by giving them better options."
The Britain-led resolution is not the only effort underway to ramp up Europe's military response to the humanitarian crisis. The European Council agreed in May to another plan to escalate military targeting of so-called smugglers, by giving a European maritime force the power to seize vessels. The Council is continuing to press Libya to approve pursuit on their soil.
The proposed military campaigns at sea have been accompanied by parallel efforts on land, with some EU leaders already tightening borders, and Hungary moving forward with a 110-mile razor wire fence to bar refugees from entry--while also bolstering its military at the border.
What's more, elected leaders across Europe and the world are using the humanitarian crisis to justify military escalation towards Syria, despite warnings that there is no military solution to the hardships refugees endure.
We are at a crossroads
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. In a few short weeks, US voters will have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. Our Fall Campaign is underway, and we need your help. To power our newsroom through the rest of the year, we need to raise $125,000 by midnight on October 31. So if you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
As their humanitarian response to the ongoing refugee crisis falters, European leaders are pressing the United Nations Security Council to authorized an escalated military force to pursue so-called "human smugglers" in the Mediterranean Sea's international waters.
The effort to advance the draft resolution is, according to Foreign Policy, being led by Britain, whose government has come under fire for "turning its back" on people seeking refuge from war and poverty.
Specifically, the plan would approve military action in international waters along a route from the coast of Libya to Italy, according to reports from the New York Times on the proposal, which will soon be circulated within the UNSC.
The route is commonly used to transport people fleeing West Africa, Eritrea, and Afghanistan, while Syrians are increasingly using a pathway that passes through Turkey. According to an unnamed Security Council diplomat quoted by The New York Times, the proposal stipulates for seized boats to be taken to Italy, where the refugees aboard would then be considered for asylum.
The plan is less severe than a previous proposal, circulated by Britain last spring, that would have allowed European military forces to pursue "human smugglers" in Libyan waters and even on the country's soil. Britain eventually abandoned the measure after failing to secure Libyan approval.
However, many have argued that military targeting of "smuggling" networks would neither deter nor help refugees, who undergo tremendous hardship and risk their lives in a bid to escape war and poverty. The UN refugee agency recently declared they do not expect the influx of refugees to Europe to slow.
Going further, many observers argue a military response is the polar opposite of the humanitarian response wealthy nations owe refugees. "A whole generation of people are putting themselves in debt to be smuggled into Europe, only to be thrown out," UN Special Rapporteur on the Human Rights of Migrants Francois Crepeau told Al Jazeera last month. "That is a really ridiculous transfer of wealth... We can help people by giving them better options."
The Britain-led resolution is not the only effort underway to ramp up Europe's military response to the humanitarian crisis. The European Council agreed in May to another plan to escalate military targeting of so-called smugglers, by giving a European maritime force the power to seize vessels. The Council is continuing to press Libya to approve pursuit on their soil.
The proposed military campaigns at sea have been accompanied by parallel efforts on land, with some EU leaders already tightening borders, and Hungary moving forward with a 110-mile razor wire fence to bar refugees from entry--while also bolstering its military at the border.
What's more, elected leaders across Europe and the world are using the humanitarian crisis to justify military escalation towards Syria, despite warnings that there is no military solution to the hardships refugees endure.
As their humanitarian response to the ongoing refugee crisis falters, European leaders are pressing the United Nations Security Council to authorized an escalated military force to pursue so-called "human smugglers" in the Mediterranean Sea's international waters.
The effort to advance the draft resolution is, according to Foreign Policy, being led by Britain, whose government has come under fire for "turning its back" on people seeking refuge from war and poverty.
Specifically, the plan would approve military action in international waters along a route from the coast of Libya to Italy, according to reports from the New York Times on the proposal, which will soon be circulated within the UNSC.
The route is commonly used to transport people fleeing West Africa, Eritrea, and Afghanistan, while Syrians are increasingly using a pathway that passes through Turkey. According to an unnamed Security Council diplomat quoted by The New York Times, the proposal stipulates for seized boats to be taken to Italy, where the refugees aboard would then be considered for asylum.
The plan is less severe than a previous proposal, circulated by Britain last spring, that would have allowed European military forces to pursue "human smugglers" in Libyan waters and even on the country's soil. Britain eventually abandoned the measure after failing to secure Libyan approval.
However, many have argued that military targeting of "smuggling" networks would neither deter nor help refugees, who undergo tremendous hardship and risk their lives in a bid to escape war and poverty. The UN refugee agency recently declared they do not expect the influx of refugees to Europe to slow.
Going further, many observers argue a military response is the polar opposite of the humanitarian response wealthy nations owe refugees. "A whole generation of people are putting themselves in debt to be smuggled into Europe, only to be thrown out," UN Special Rapporteur on the Human Rights of Migrants Francois Crepeau told Al Jazeera last month. "That is a really ridiculous transfer of wealth... We can help people by giving them better options."
The Britain-led resolution is not the only effort underway to ramp up Europe's military response to the humanitarian crisis. The European Council agreed in May to another plan to escalate military targeting of so-called smugglers, by giving a European maritime force the power to seize vessels. The Council is continuing to press Libya to approve pursuit on their soil.
The proposed military campaigns at sea have been accompanied by parallel efforts on land, with some EU leaders already tightening borders, and Hungary moving forward with a 110-mile razor wire fence to bar refugees from entry--while also bolstering its military at the border.
What's more, elected leaders across Europe and the world are using the humanitarian crisis to justify military escalation towards Syria, despite warnings that there is no military solution to the hardships refugees endure.