SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
'Perilously' Outdated Voting Machines Threaten 2016 Election, Report Finds
Brennan Center for Justice finds 'significant percentages' of problematic machines are in swing states
Sep 15, 2015
Electronic voting machines in 43 states are at least a decade old, "perilously close to the end of most systems' expected lifespan," and could pose a risk to the 2016 election, a new study from the the Brennan Center for Justice at New York University School of Law finds.
After a 10 month probe that included interviews with over 100 election officials and experts in every state, the investigators concluded that the threat also extends to "significant percentages of machines" in swing states including Florida, North Carolina, Ohio, and Virginia.
Entitled America's Voting Machines at Risk, the study warns: "Old voting equipment increases the risk of failures and crashes--which can lead to long lines and lost votes on Election Day--and problems only get worse the longer we wait."
The warning evokes the "hanging chads" scandal that swept George W. Bush into the presidency in 2000 despite the fact that he lost the nationwide popular vote. While the debacle prompted Congress to appropriate $2 billion towards electronic voting systems, that equipment is now quickly becoming outdated, the report warns.
" Technology has changed dramatically in the last decade," said Christopher Famighetti, co-author of the report, in a statement. "Several recent innovations show it's possible to move toward more affordable and flexible voting machines. States must develop plans to deal with aging machines before 2016, and invest in the next generation of machines for future elections to come."
Forty-three states are using machines that will be at least 10 years old during next year's election, the report states. Meanwhile, 14 states will be using machines that will be more than 15 years old.
However, no state is in the clear. "Nearly every state is using some machines that are no longer manufactured and many election officials struggle to find replacement parts," the study determines.
Election authorities and experts who think there is a problem don't all have the resources to replace their outdated machinery. "Election jurisdictions in at least 31 states want to purchase new voting machines in the next five years," the report notes. "Officials from 22 of these states said they did not know where they would get the money to pay for them."
Even more troubling, in states that leave it to counties to fund their own machines, "there is compelling evidence that bigger, wealthier counties have purchased new machines, while poorer, rural counties are left with old equipment," a research summary warns.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Sarah Lazare
Sarah Lazare is the editor of Workday Magazine and a contributing editor for In These Times. She is a former Staff Writer at Common Dreams. She comes from a background in independent journalism for publications including The Intercept, The Nation, and Tom Dispatch.
Electronic voting machines in 43 states are at least a decade old, "perilously close to the end of most systems' expected lifespan," and could pose a risk to the 2016 election, a new study from the the Brennan Center for Justice at New York University School of Law finds.
After a 10 month probe that included interviews with over 100 election officials and experts in every state, the investigators concluded that the threat also extends to "significant percentages of machines" in swing states including Florida, North Carolina, Ohio, and Virginia.
Entitled America's Voting Machines at Risk, the study warns: "Old voting equipment increases the risk of failures and crashes--which can lead to long lines and lost votes on Election Day--and problems only get worse the longer we wait."
The warning evokes the "hanging chads" scandal that swept George W. Bush into the presidency in 2000 despite the fact that he lost the nationwide popular vote. While the debacle prompted Congress to appropriate $2 billion towards electronic voting systems, that equipment is now quickly becoming outdated, the report warns.
" Technology has changed dramatically in the last decade," said Christopher Famighetti, co-author of the report, in a statement. "Several recent innovations show it's possible to move toward more affordable and flexible voting machines. States must develop plans to deal with aging machines before 2016, and invest in the next generation of machines for future elections to come."
Forty-three states are using machines that will be at least 10 years old during next year's election, the report states. Meanwhile, 14 states will be using machines that will be more than 15 years old.
However, no state is in the clear. "Nearly every state is using some machines that are no longer manufactured and many election officials struggle to find replacement parts," the study determines.
Election authorities and experts who think there is a problem don't all have the resources to replace their outdated machinery. "Election jurisdictions in at least 31 states want to purchase new voting machines in the next five years," the report notes. "Officials from 22 of these states said they did not know where they would get the money to pay for them."
Even more troubling, in states that leave it to counties to fund their own machines, "there is compelling evidence that bigger, wealthier counties have purchased new machines, while poorer, rural counties are left with old equipment," a research summary warns.
Sarah Lazare
Sarah Lazare is the editor of Workday Magazine and a contributing editor for In These Times. She is a former Staff Writer at Common Dreams. She comes from a background in independent journalism for publications including The Intercept, The Nation, and Tom Dispatch.
Electronic voting machines in 43 states are at least a decade old, "perilously close to the end of most systems' expected lifespan," and could pose a risk to the 2016 election, a new study from the the Brennan Center for Justice at New York University School of Law finds.
After a 10 month probe that included interviews with over 100 election officials and experts in every state, the investigators concluded that the threat also extends to "significant percentages of machines" in swing states including Florida, North Carolina, Ohio, and Virginia.
Entitled America's Voting Machines at Risk, the study warns: "Old voting equipment increases the risk of failures and crashes--which can lead to long lines and lost votes on Election Day--and problems only get worse the longer we wait."
The warning evokes the "hanging chads" scandal that swept George W. Bush into the presidency in 2000 despite the fact that he lost the nationwide popular vote. While the debacle prompted Congress to appropriate $2 billion towards electronic voting systems, that equipment is now quickly becoming outdated, the report warns.
" Technology has changed dramatically in the last decade," said Christopher Famighetti, co-author of the report, in a statement. "Several recent innovations show it's possible to move toward more affordable and flexible voting machines. States must develop plans to deal with aging machines before 2016, and invest in the next generation of machines for future elections to come."
Forty-three states are using machines that will be at least 10 years old during next year's election, the report states. Meanwhile, 14 states will be using machines that will be more than 15 years old.
However, no state is in the clear. "Nearly every state is using some machines that are no longer manufactured and many election officials struggle to find replacement parts," the study determines.
Election authorities and experts who think there is a problem don't all have the resources to replace their outdated machinery. "Election jurisdictions in at least 31 states want to purchase new voting machines in the next five years," the report notes. "Officials from 22 of these states said they did not know where they would get the money to pay for them."
Even more troubling, in states that leave it to counties to fund their own machines, "there is compelling evidence that bigger, wealthier counties have purchased new machines, while poorer, rural counties are left with old equipment," a research summary warns.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.