Digital Rights 'Sold Off' as European Parliament Jettisons Net Neutrality
Parliament's vote "a profound disillusion for all those who, throughout the years, battled to ensure net neutrality in Europe."
In a major setback for net neutrality, the European Parliament passed widely-maligned internet regulations without the amendments that rights groups said were crucial to protect free speech, democracy, and innovation online.
Wide loopholes in the rules allow Internet Service Providers (ISPs) to discriminate against networks, speed up or slow down Internet traffic, charge companies for faster loading times, and strip users of protections. The legislation passed 500-163.
"Today, Europe took a giant step away from its vision of becoming a world leader in the digital economy," said Anne Jellema, CEO of the digital rights group World Wide Web Foundation. "These weak and unclear net neutrality regulations threaten innovation and free speech. Now, European start-ups may have to compete on an uneven playing field against industry titans, while small civil society groups risk having their voices overwhelmed by well-funded giants."
The Paris-based advocacy organization La Quadrature Du Net described the vote as "a profound disillusion for all those who, throughout the years, battled to ensure net neutrality in Europe."
"Today [members of Parliament] had the chance to stand their ground against the Council and the Commission, but they only showed timid faces in front of threats to abandon the text or prolong the negotiations. By voting this incomplete and non-protective text, they sell off citizens' rights and liberties and hamper small and innovative companies in favor of big telecommunication companies," said La Quadrature legal and policy analysis coordinator Agnes de Cornulier. "They also give a bad signal on their weakness, thus endangering all future negotiations."
Following the vote, the Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications (BEREC) will have nine months to develop guidelines for state-based agencies, like Ofcom in the United Kingdom, to implement the new rules.
Advocacy groups said those guidelines could help consumers and companies regain some of their power amid the rejection of wider net neutrality protections, even if it comes through future court rulings on those regulations.
"All is not lost," Jellema said. "The European Parliament is essentially tossing a hot potato to the Body of European Regulators, national regulators and the courts, who will have to decide how these spectacularly unclear rules will be implemented. The onus is now on these groups to heed the call of hundreds of thousands of concerned citizens and prevent a two-speed Internet."
De Cornulier added, "The task to mend the text's loopholes left by the MEPs now rests on governments deprived of transparency, at the risk of widening them even more, until Justice intervenes and long-lasting judiciary procedures set out an uncertain precedence."
We are at a crossroads
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. In a few short weeks, US voters will have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. Our Fall Campaign is underway, and we need your help. To power our newsroom through the rest of the year, we need to raise $125,000 by midnight on October 31. So if you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
In a major setback for net neutrality, the European Parliament passed widely-maligned internet regulations without the amendments that rights groups said were crucial to protect free speech, democracy, and innovation online.
Wide loopholes in the rules allow Internet Service Providers (ISPs) to discriminate against networks, speed up or slow down Internet traffic, charge companies for faster loading times, and strip users of protections. The legislation passed 500-163.
"Today, Europe took a giant step away from its vision of becoming a world leader in the digital economy," said Anne Jellema, CEO of the digital rights group World Wide Web Foundation. "These weak and unclear net neutrality regulations threaten innovation and free speech. Now, European start-ups may have to compete on an uneven playing field against industry titans, while small civil society groups risk having their voices overwhelmed by well-funded giants."
The Paris-based advocacy organization La Quadrature Du Net described the vote as "a profound disillusion for all those who, throughout the years, battled to ensure net neutrality in Europe."
"Today [members of Parliament] had the chance to stand their ground against the Council and the Commission, but they only showed timid faces in front of threats to abandon the text or prolong the negotiations. By voting this incomplete and non-protective text, they sell off citizens' rights and liberties and hamper small and innovative companies in favor of big telecommunication companies," said La Quadrature legal and policy analysis coordinator Agnes de Cornulier. "They also give a bad signal on their weakness, thus endangering all future negotiations."
Following the vote, the Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications (BEREC) will have nine months to develop guidelines for state-based agencies, like Ofcom in the United Kingdom, to implement the new rules.
Advocacy groups said those guidelines could help consumers and companies regain some of their power amid the rejection of wider net neutrality protections, even if it comes through future court rulings on those regulations.
"All is not lost," Jellema said. "The European Parliament is essentially tossing a hot potato to the Body of European Regulators, national regulators and the courts, who will have to decide how these spectacularly unclear rules will be implemented. The onus is now on these groups to heed the call of hundreds of thousands of concerned citizens and prevent a two-speed Internet."
De Cornulier added, "The task to mend the text's loopholes left by the MEPs now rests on governments deprived of transparency, at the risk of widening them even more, until Justice intervenes and long-lasting judiciary procedures set out an uncertain precedence."
In a major setback for net neutrality, the European Parliament passed widely-maligned internet regulations without the amendments that rights groups said were crucial to protect free speech, democracy, and innovation online.
Wide loopholes in the rules allow Internet Service Providers (ISPs) to discriminate against networks, speed up or slow down Internet traffic, charge companies for faster loading times, and strip users of protections. The legislation passed 500-163.
"Today, Europe took a giant step away from its vision of becoming a world leader in the digital economy," said Anne Jellema, CEO of the digital rights group World Wide Web Foundation. "These weak and unclear net neutrality regulations threaten innovation and free speech. Now, European start-ups may have to compete on an uneven playing field against industry titans, while small civil society groups risk having their voices overwhelmed by well-funded giants."
The Paris-based advocacy organization La Quadrature Du Net described the vote as "a profound disillusion for all those who, throughout the years, battled to ensure net neutrality in Europe."
"Today [members of Parliament] had the chance to stand their ground against the Council and the Commission, but they only showed timid faces in front of threats to abandon the text or prolong the negotiations. By voting this incomplete and non-protective text, they sell off citizens' rights and liberties and hamper small and innovative companies in favor of big telecommunication companies," said La Quadrature legal and policy analysis coordinator Agnes de Cornulier. "They also give a bad signal on their weakness, thus endangering all future negotiations."
Following the vote, the Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications (BEREC) will have nine months to develop guidelines for state-based agencies, like Ofcom in the United Kingdom, to implement the new rules.
Advocacy groups said those guidelines could help consumers and companies regain some of their power amid the rejection of wider net neutrality protections, even if it comes through future court rulings on those regulations.
"All is not lost," Jellema said. "The European Parliament is essentially tossing a hot potato to the Body of European Regulators, national regulators and the courts, who will have to decide how these spectacularly unclear rules will be implemented. The onus is now on these groups to heed the call of hundreds of thousands of concerned citizens and prevent a two-speed Internet."
De Cornulier added, "The task to mend the text's loopholes left by the MEPs now rests on governments deprived of transparency, at the risk of widening them even more, until Justice intervenes and long-lasting judiciary procedures set out an uncertain precedence."