SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Internet freedom worldwide declined for the fifth consecutive year in 2015 as more governments censored information of public interest, expanded surveillance, and cracked down on privacy tools.
For the fifth year in a row, global internet freedom continued its downward trend in 2015, with more governments censoring information of public interest while simultaneously expanding surveillance and thwarting privacy tools, according to the annual assessment by the U.S.-based Freedom House released Wednesday.
Since June 2014, 32 of the 65 countries assessed in Freedom on the Net (pdf) saw internet freedom deteriorate, according to the nonprofit, which monitors digital rights and advocates for democracy. Notable declines were documented in Libya, France, and--for the second year running--Ukraine, amid what Freedom House describes as "its territorial conflict and propaganda war with Russia."
While the end is the same--increasing erosion of privacy and human rights afforded by a free and open internet--the means have shifted slightly.
"Governments are increasingly pressuring individuals and the private sector to take down or delete offending content, as opposed to relying on blocking and filtering," explained Sanja Kelly, project director for Freedom on the Net. "They know that average users have become more technologically savvy and can often circumvent state-imposed blocks."
According to the report, authorities in 42 of the 65 countries assessed required private companies or internet users to restrict or delete web content dealing with political, religious, or social issues, up from 37 the previous year. Criticism of the authorities was most likely to attract censorship or punishment. At the same time, news about conflict, corruption allegations against top government or business figures, opposition websites, and satire were also subject to online censorship in over one-third of the countries examined.
In fact, the study found that over 61 percent of all internet users live in countries where criticism of the government, military, or ruling family has been subject to online censorship, and over 58 percent live in countries where bloggers or other internet users have been jailed for sharing content on political, social, and religious issues.
Meanwhile, even as governments in 14 of 65 countries passed new laws to increase surveillance and many more upgraded their surveillance equipment, encryption, and anonymity tools crucial to securing freedom of expression were subject to restrictions worldwide.
"Given the mounting concerns over government surveillance, companies, and internet users have taken up new tools to protect the privacy of their data and identity," the report reads, noting that UN Special Rapporteur David Kaye stated in May 2015 that encryption and anonymity are essential to basic human rights.
"Unfortunately," the report continues, "governments around the world have moved to limit encryption and undermine anonymity for all internet users, often citing the use of these tools by terrorists and criminals. Such restrictions disproportionately threaten the lives and work of human rights activists, journalists, opposition political figures, and members of ethnic, religious, and sexual minorities."
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
For the fifth year in a row, global internet freedom continued its downward trend in 2015, with more governments censoring information of public interest while simultaneously expanding surveillance and thwarting privacy tools, according to the annual assessment by the U.S.-based Freedom House released Wednesday.
Since June 2014, 32 of the 65 countries assessed in Freedom on the Net (pdf) saw internet freedom deteriorate, according to the nonprofit, which monitors digital rights and advocates for democracy. Notable declines were documented in Libya, France, and--for the second year running--Ukraine, amid what Freedom House describes as "its territorial conflict and propaganda war with Russia."
While the end is the same--increasing erosion of privacy and human rights afforded by a free and open internet--the means have shifted slightly.
"Governments are increasingly pressuring individuals and the private sector to take down or delete offending content, as opposed to relying on blocking and filtering," explained Sanja Kelly, project director for Freedom on the Net. "They know that average users have become more technologically savvy and can often circumvent state-imposed blocks."
According to the report, authorities in 42 of the 65 countries assessed required private companies or internet users to restrict or delete web content dealing with political, religious, or social issues, up from 37 the previous year. Criticism of the authorities was most likely to attract censorship or punishment. At the same time, news about conflict, corruption allegations against top government or business figures, opposition websites, and satire were also subject to online censorship in over one-third of the countries examined.
In fact, the study found that over 61 percent of all internet users live in countries where criticism of the government, military, or ruling family has been subject to online censorship, and over 58 percent live in countries where bloggers or other internet users have been jailed for sharing content on political, social, and religious issues.
Meanwhile, even as governments in 14 of 65 countries passed new laws to increase surveillance and many more upgraded their surveillance equipment, encryption, and anonymity tools crucial to securing freedom of expression were subject to restrictions worldwide.
"Given the mounting concerns over government surveillance, companies, and internet users have taken up new tools to protect the privacy of their data and identity," the report reads, noting that UN Special Rapporteur David Kaye stated in May 2015 that encryption and anonymity are essential to basic human rights.
"Unfortunately," the report continues, "governments around the world have moved to limit encryption and undermine anonymity for all internet users, often citing the use of these tools by terrorists and criminals. Such restrictions disproportionately threaten the lives and work of human rights activists, journalists, opposition political figures, and members of ethnic, religious, and sexual minorities."
For the fifth year in a row, global internet freedom continued its downward trend in 2015, with more governments censoring information of public interest while simultaneously expanding surveillance and thwarting privacy tools, according to the annual assessment by the U.S.-based Freedom House released Wednesday.
Since June 2014, 32 of the 65 countries assessed in Freedom on the Net (pdf) saw internet freedom deteriorate, according to the nonprofit, which monitors digital rights and advocates for democracy. Notable declines were documented in Libya, France, and--for the second year running--Ukraine, amid what Freedom House describes as "its territorial conflict and propaganda war with Russia."
While the end is the same--increasing erosion of privacy and human rights afforded by a free and open internet--the means have shifted slightly.
"Governments are increasingly pressuring individuals and the private sector to take down or delete offending content, as opposed to relying on blocking and filtering," explained Sanja Kelly, project director for Freedom on the Net. "They know that average users have become more technologically savvy and can often circumvent state-imposed blocks."
According to the report, authorities in 42 of the 65 countries assessed required private companies or internet users to restrict or delete web content dealing with political, religious, or social issues, up from 37 the previous year. Criticism of the authorities was most likely to attract censorship or punishment. At the same time, news about conflict, corruption allegations against top government or business figures, opposition websites, and satire were also subject to online censorship in over one-third of the countries examined.
In fact, the study found that over 61 percent of all internet users live in countries where criticism of the government, military, or ruling family has been subject to online censorship, and over 58 percent live in countries where bloggers or other internet users have been jailed for sharing content on political, social, and religious issues.
Meanwhile, even as governments in 14 of 65 countries passed new laws to increase surveillance and many more upgraded their surveillance equipment, encryption, and anonymity tools crucial to securing freedom of expression were subject to restrictions worldwide.
"Given the mounting concerns over government surveillance, companies, and internet users have taken up new tools to protect the privacy of their data and identity," the report reads, noting that UN Special Rapporteur David Kaye stated in May 2015 that encryption and anonymity are essential to basic human rights.
"Unfortunately," the report continues, "governments around the world have moved to limit encryption and undermine anonymity for all internet users, often citing the use of these tools by terrorists and criminals. Such restrictions disproportionately threaten the lives and work of human rights activists, journalists, opposition political figures, and members of ethnic, religious, and sexual minorities."