

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
A scandal with potentially national implications has erupted at a Las Vegas newspaper. Someone bought the publication, said to be Nevada's largest and most influential news source, and nobody will say who.
In fact, according to reports, the buyer's anonymity was a stipulation of the $140 million cash sale. That secrecy is being challenged by the Las Vegas Review-Journal's own staff, who on Monday launched a concerted Twitter effort and investigation to unmask the mysterious backer.
"At 4 p.m. EST on Monday, around two dozen Review-Journal staffers began tweeting links to the Society of Professional Journalists' Code of Ethics, which includes a section on being 'accountable and transparent,'" the Huffington Post reports.
And according to the New York Times, other reporters "were working on uncovering the identity of the buyer; an article that sought to explore the paper's ownership was submitted but not published, according to two people familiar with the situation."
Meanwhile, as Review-Journal columnist John Smith tweeted on Monday:
Late last week, the Review-Journal published an article saying that it, along with its sister publications, had been "acquired by News + Media Capital Group LLC, a newly formed Delaware-domiciled company backed by 'undisclosed financial backers with expertise in the media industry.'"
However, "the publisher later removed questions in the article about the group's owners remaining secret," the Huffington Post noted.
The nondisclosure is even more troubling because of the influential role that Nevada holds in the upcoming 2016 presidential election.
As Fiona Morgan, journalism program director with the open media organization Free Press, pointed out, "The Review-Journal is Nevada's most influential newspaper, and Nevada is an early primary state in the 2016 presidential campaign, which makes knowing the owners and their political objectives, if any, a matter of national significance."
Charles and David Koch, co-founders of Koch Industries and major donors to conservative candidates, have already denied that they were behind the deal.
Free Press issued a statement on Monday saying it stands with the Review-Journal staff in their call for the new owners "to come out of the shadows."
"Reporters ask for transparency of others in power, so it's critical that news organizations themselves be held accountable and reveal their owners to readers, sources and their own employees," Morgan added.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
A scandal with potentially national implications has erupted at a Las Vegas newspaper. Someone bought the publication, said to be Nevada's largest and most influential news source, and nobody will say who.
In fact, according to reports, the buyer's anonymity was a stipulation of the $140 million cash sale. That secrecy is being challenged by the Las Vegas Review-Journal's own staff, who on Monday launched a concerted Twitter effort and investigation to unmask the mysterious backer.
"At 4 p.m. EST on Monday, around two dozen Review-Journal staffers began tweeting links to the Society of Professional Journalists' Code of Ethics, which includes a section on being 'accountable and transparent,'" the Huffington Post reports.
And according to the New York Times, other reporters "were working on uncovering the identity of the buyer; an article that sought to explore the paper's ownership was submitted but not published, according to two people familiar with the situation."
Meanwhile, as Review-Journal columnist John Smith tweeted on Monday:
Late last week, the Review-Journal published an article saying that it, along with its sister publications, had been "acquired by News + Media Capital Group LLC, a newly formed Delaware-domiciled company backed by 'undisclosed financial backers with expertise in the media industry.'"
However, "the publisher later removed questions in the article about the group's owners remaining secret," the Huffington Post noted.
The nondisclosure is even more troubling because of the influential role that Nevada holds in the upcoming 2016 presidential election.
As Fiona Morgan, journalism program director with the open media organization Free Press, pointed out, "The Review-Journal is Nevada's most influential newspaper, and Nevada is an early primary state in the 2016 presidential campaign, which makes knowing the owners and their political objectives, if any, a matter of national significance."
Charles and David Koch, co-founders of Koch Industries and major donors to conservative candidates, have already denied that they were behind the deal.
Free Press issued a statement on Monday saying it stands with the Review-Journal staff in their call for the new owners "to come out of the shadows."
"Reporters ask for transparency of others in power, so it's critical that news organizations themselves be held accountable and reveal their owners to readers, sources and their own employees," Morgan added.
A scandal with potentially national implications has erupted at a Las Vegas newspaper. Someone bought the publication, said to be Nevada's largest and most influential news source, and nobody will say who.
In fact, according to reports, the buyer's anonymity was a stipulation of the $140 million cash sale. That secrecy is being challenged by the Las Vegas Review-Journal's own staff, who on Monday launched a concerted Twitter effort and investigation to unmask the mysterious backer.
"At 4 p.m. EST on Monday, around two dozen Review-Journal staffers began tweeting links to the Society of Professional Journalists' Code of Ethics, which includes a section on being 'accountable and transparent,'" the Huffington Post reports.
And according to the New York Times, other reporters "were working on uncovering the identity of the buyer; an article that sought to explore the paper's ownership was submitted but not published, according to two people familiar with the situation."
Meanwhile, as Review-Journal columnist John Smith tweeted on Monday:
Late last week, the Review-Journal published an article saying that it, along with its sister publications, had been "acquired by News + Media Capital Group LLC, a newly formed Delaware-domiciled company backed by 'undisclosed financial backers with expertise in the media industry.'"
However, "the publisher later removed questions in the article about the group's owners remaining secret," the Huffington Post noted.
The nondisclosure is even more troubling because of the influential role that Nevada holds in the upcoming 2016 presidential election.
As Fiona Morgan, journalism program director with the open media organization Free Press, pointed out, "The Review-Journal is Nevada's most influential newspaper, and Nevada is an early primary state in the 2016 presidential campaign, which makes knowing the owners and their political objectives, if any, a matter of national significance."
Charles and David Koch, co-founders of Koch Industries and major donors to conservative candidates, have already denied that they were behind the deal.
Free Press issued a statement on Monday saying it stands with the Review-Journal staff in their call for the new owners "to come out of the shadows."
"Reporters ask for transparency of others in power, so it's critical that news organizations themselves be held accountable and reveal their owners to readers, sources and their own employees," Morgan added.