SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Demonstrators at a fracking protest in London on Jan. 26, 2015. (Photo: RonF/The Weekly Bull/flickr/cc)
What Global Climate Deal? UK Lawmakers OK Fracking Under National Parks
'Ministers must urgently rethink their entire approach to energy policy'
Dec 16, 2015
British lawmakers on Wednesday voted to allow fracking under national parks and other protected areas.
"It is incredible that this decision comes just days after signing a ground-breaking climate change agreement in Paris," stated MEP Scott Cato.
The Guardianreports that
[m]inisters used a statutory instrument to push through the new rules, which means legislation can pass into law without a debate in the House of Commons. MPs voted in favour by 298 to 261.
As Liberal Democrat head Tim Farron described it, "Government used a parliamentary wheeze to pass the change with no parliamentary debate," while Shadow energy and climate secretary Lisa Nandy said the lack of debate was "frankly shabby."
The Independent adds:
The change will also allow the industrial process to be conducted below UNESCO World Heritage Sites like Stonehenge were shale gas ever found there. Regulations were also relaxed around drinking water aquifers.
The new regulations just require that the drilling begin from outside those protected areas.
Environmental campaigners issued scathing responses to the development, and said the government should instead be banning fracking.
Calling the decision "a complete U-turn on earlier promises," Rose Dickinson, energy campaigner at Friends of the Earth, said, "People will rightly be concerned that the government is not following through on its commitment to have strong regulation on fracking."
"The government's own draft report found contaminated water poses risks to human health. Yet these new rules will put our drinking water and national parks at risk of fracking," she said.
Green Party MP Caroline Lucas said the decision was "deeply disappointing."
"If the government is to match its rhetoric on the climate deal struck in Paris, then ministers must urgently rethink their entire approach to energy policy. To have any realistic chance of keeping global warming to well under 2 degrees we need to ban fracking in the UK."
"Not only does fracking fly in the face of the climate science but mounting evidence suggests it won't lower bills," she said.
Farron said, "Government should hang its head in shame."
On January 20th, it begins...
Political revenge. Mass deportations. Project 2025. Unfathomable corruption. Attacks on Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid. Pardons for insurrectionists. An all-out assault on democracy. Republicans in Congress are scrambling to give Trump broad new powers to strip the tax-exempt status of any nonprofit he doesn’t like by declaring it a “terrorist-supporting organization.” Trump has already begun filing lawsuits against news outlets that criticize him. At Common Dreams, we won’t back down, but we must get ready for whatever Trump and his thugs throw at us. Our Year-End campaign is our most important fundraiser of the year. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover issues the corporate media never will, but we can only continue with our readers’ support. By donating today, please help us fight the dangers of a second Trump presidency. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
British lawmakers on Wednesday voted to allow fracking under national parks and other protected areas.
"It is incredible that this decision comes just days after signing a ground-breaking climate change agreement in Paris," stated MEP Scott Cato.
The Guardianreports that
[m]inisters used a statutory instrument to push through the new rules, which means legislation can pass into law without a debate in the House of Commons. MPs voted in favour by 298 to 261.
As Liberal Democrat head Tim Farron described it, "Government used a parliamentary wheeze to pass the change with no parliamentary debate," while Shadow energy and climate secretary Lisa Nandy said the lack of debate was "frankly shabby."
The Independent adds:
The change will also allow the industrial process to be conducted below UNESCO World Heritage Sites like Stonehenge were shale gas ever found there. Regulations were also relaxed around drinking water aquifers.
The new regulations just require that the drilling begin from outside those protected areas.
Environmental campaigners issued scathing responses to the development, and said the government should instead be banning fracking.
Calling the decision "a complete U-turn on earlier promises," Rose Dickinson, energy campaigner at Friends of the Earth, said, "People will rightly be concerned that the government is not following through on its commitment to have strong regulation on fracking."
"The government's own draft report found contaminated water poses risks to human health. Yet these new rules will put our drinking water and national parks at risk of fracking," she said.
Green Party MP Caroline Lucas said the decision was "deeply disappointing."
"If the government is to match its rhetoric on the climate deal struck in Paris, then ministers must urgently rethink their entire approach to energy policy. To have any realistic chance of keeping global warming to well under 2 degrees we need to ban fracking in the UK."
"Not only does fracking fly in the face of the climate science but mounting evidence suggests it won't lower bills," she said.
Farron said, "Government should hang its head in shame."
British lawmakers on Wednesday voted to allow fracking under national parks and other protected areas.
"It is incredible that this decision comes just days after signing a ground-breaking climate change agreement in Paris," stated MEP Scott Cato.
The Guardianreports that
[m]inisters used a statutory instrument to push through the new rules, which means legislation can pass into law without a debate in the House of Commons. MPs voted in favour by 298 to 261.
As Liberal Democrat head Tim Farron described it, "Government used a parliamentary wheeze to pass the change with no parliamentary debate," while Shadow energy and climate secretary Lisa Nandy said the lack of debate was "frankly shabby."
The Independent adds:
The change will also allow the industrial process to be conducted below UNESCO World Heritage Sites like Stonehenge were shale gas ever found there. Regulations were also relaxed around drinking water aquifers.
The new regulations just require that the drilling begin from outside those protected areas.
Environmental campaigners issued scathing responses to the development, and said the government should instead be banning fracking.
Calling the decision "a complete U-turn on earlier promises," Rose Dickinson, energy campaigner at Friends of the Earth, said, "People will rightly be concerned that the government is not following through on its commitment to have strong regulation on fracking."
"The government's own draft report found contaminated water poses risks to human health. Yet these new rules will put our drinking water and national parks at risk of fracking," she said.
Green Party MP Caroline Lucas said the decision was "deeply disappointing."
"If the government is to match its rhetoric on the climate deal struck in Paris, then ministers must urgently rethink their entire approach to energy policy. To have any realistic chance of keeping global warming to well under 2 degrees we need to ban fracking in the UK."
"Not only does fracking fly in the face of the climate science but mounting evidence suggests it won't lower bills," she said.
Farron said, "Government should hang its head in shame."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.