SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Though the Democratic National Committee (DNC) late Friday reversed its controversial decision to block the Bernie Sanders campaign from accessing important voter information, the skirmish raised questions about the organization's neutrality in the presidential contest.
Hours after the Sanders campaign filed (pdf) a lawsuit against the party, chair Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (Fl.) issued a statement saying that the DNC will restore campaign access to the voter file while the group continues to investigate the alleged data breach.
"Clearly, they were very concerned about their prospects in court," said Sanders' campaign manager Jeff Weaver. The suit charges that the campaign would suffer "sustaining irreparable injury and financial losses" exceeding $600,000 each day if unable to retrieve essential voter information.
Further, organizers argue that the security lapse was rather the fault of the DNC. "Now what we need to restore confidence in the DNC's ability to secure data is an independent audit that encompasses the DNC's record this entire campaign," Weaver added. "Transparency at the DNC is essential. We trust they have nothing to hide."
After the DNC leaked the news to the press, the national party was barraged with messages from supporters of Sanders accusing the group of placing "its thumb on the scales in support of Hillary Clinton's campaign," as Weaver wrote in a campaign email.
More than 214,800 people who signed an online petition to the DNC circulated by Sanders' campaign. MoveOn.org collected another 250,000 signatures while Democracy for America, which just Thursday announced it was endorsing the Vermont Senator's presidential bid, collected 100,000.
\u201cW/out evidence that his hierarchy knew about data-poaching, harsh penalty v. @BernieSanders looks like @DNC is putting finger on scale.\u201d— David Axelrod (@David Axelrod) 1450481235
DFA executive director Charles Chamberlain issued a strong statement against the DNC, saying its "decision to attack the campaign that figured out the problem, rather than go after the vendor that made the mistake, is profoundly damaging to the party's Democratic process."
Sanders' campaign maintains that the employee accused of penetrating the confidential files gathered by the rival campaign of Hillary Clinton was, in fact, trying to understand the extent of the software error.
Further, Chamberlain alluded to the mounting critique of the national party, saying it must restore equity "before the committee does even more to bring its neutrality in the race for President into question."
The controversy erupted as democratic candidates geared up for their third debate, which will be held in New Hampshire Saturday evening and aired on ABC News. The DNC has also faced criticism over the number and timing of the primary debates--including this latest, which is expected to have a low viewer turnout due to its scheduling on the Saturday before Christmas.--which, critics argue, is a boost to frontrunner Clinton.
Indeed, Weaver also said was "disconcerting" that the move to limit the campaign's actions came on the very same day the campaign "reached two million individual contributions and received two of our most prominent endorsements."
Sanders' campaign and supporters will be commenting on the debate live under the hashtag #DebateWithBernie.
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Though the Democratic National Committee (DNC) late Friday reversed its controversial decision to block the Bernie Sanders campaign from accessing important voter information, the skirmish raised questions about the organization's neutrality in the presidential contest.
Hours after the Sanders campaign filed (pdf) a lawsuit against the party, chair Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (Fl.) issued a statement saying that the DNC will restore campaign access to the voter file while the group continues to investigate the alleged data breach.
"Clearly, they were very concerned about their prospects in court," said Sanders' campaign manager Jeff Weaver. The suit charges that the campaign would suffer "sustaining irreparable injury and financial losses" exceeding $600,000 each day if unable to retrieve essential voter information.
Further, organizers argue that the security lapse was rather the fault of the DNC. "Now what we need to restore confidence in the DNC's ability to secure data is an independent audit that encompasses the DNC's record this entire campaign," Weaver added. "Transparency at the DNC is essential. We trust they have nothing to hide."
After the DNC leaked the news to the press, the national party was barraged with messages from supporters of Sanders accusing the group of placing "its thumb on the scales in support of Hillary Clinton's campaign," as Weaver wrote in a campaign email.
More than 214,800 people who signed an online petition to the DNC circulated by Sanders' campaign. MoveOn.org collected another 250,000 signatures while Democracy for America, which just Thursday announced it was endorsing the Vermont Senator's presidential bid, collected 100,000.
\u201cW/out evidence that his hierarchy knew about data-poaching, harsh penalty v. @BernieSanders looks like @DNC is putting finger on scale.\u201d— David Axelrod (@David Axelrod) 1450481235
DFA executive director Charles Chamberlain issued a strong statement against the DNC, saying its "decision to attack the campaign that figured out the problem, rather than go after the vendor that made the mistake, is profoundly damaging to the party's Democratic process."
Sanders' campaign maintains that the employee accused of penetrating the confidential files gathered by the rival campaign of Hillary Clinton was, in fact, trying to understand the extent of the software error.
Further, Chamberlain alluded to the mounting critique of the national party, saying it must restore equity "before the committee does even more to bring its neutrality in the race for President into question."
The controversy erupted as democratic candidates geared up for their third debate, which will be held in New Hampshire Saturday evening and aired on ABC News. The DNC has also faced criticism over the number and timing of the primary debates--including this latest, which is expected to have a low viewer turnout due to its scheduling on the Saturday before Christmas.--which, critics argue, is a boost to frontrunner Clinton.
Indeed, Weaver also said was "disconcerting" that the move to limit the campaign's actions came on the very same day the campaign "reached two million individual contributions and received two of our most prominent endorsements."
Sanders' campaign and supporters will be commenting on the debate live under the hashtag #DebateWithBernie.
Though the Democratic National Committee (DNC) late Friday reversed its controversial decision to block the Bernie Sanders campaign from accessing important voter information, the skirmish raised questions about the organization's neutrality in the presidential contest.
Hours after the Sanders campaign filed (pdf) a lawsuit against the party, chair Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (Fl.) issued a statement saying that the DNC will restore campaign access to the voter file while the group continues to investigate the alleged data breach.
"Clearly, they were very concerned about their prospects in court," said Sanders' campaign manager Jeff Weaver. The suit charges that the campaign would suffer "sustaining irreparable injury and financial losses" exceeding $600,000 each day if unable to retrieve essential voter information.
Further, organizers argue that the security lapse was rather the fault of the DNC. "Now what we need to restore confidence in the DNC's ability to secure data is an independent audit that encompasses the DNC's record this entire campaign," Weaver added. "Transparency at the DNC is essential. We trust they have nothing to hide."
After the DNC leaked the news to the press, the national party was barraged with messages from supporters of Sanders accusing the group of placing "its thumb on the scales in support of Hillary Clinton's campaign," as Weaver wrote in a campaign email.
More than 214,800 people who signed an online petition to the DNC circulated by Sanders' campaign. MoveOn.org collected another 250,000 signatures while Democracy for America, which just Thursday announced it was endorsing the Vermont Senator's presidential bid, collected 100,000.
\u201cW/out evidence that his hierarchy knew about data-poaching, harsh penalty v. @BernieSanders looks like @DNC is putting finger on scale.\u201d— David Axelrod (@David Axelrod) 1450481235
DFA executive director Charles Chamberlain issued a strong statement against the DNC, saying its "decision to attack the campaign that figured out the problem, rather than go after the vendor that made the mistake, is profoundly damaging to the party's Democratic process."
Sanders' campaign maintains that the employee accused of penetrating the confidential files gathered by the rival campaign of Hillary Clinton was, in fact, trying to understand the extent of the software error.
Further, Chamberlain alluded to the mounting critique of the national party, saying it must restore equity "before the committee does even more to bring its neutrality in the race for President into question."
The controversy erupted as democratic candidates geared up for their third debate, which will be held in New Hampshire Saturday evening and aired on ABC News. The DNC has also faced criticism over the number and timing of the primary debates--including this latest, which is expected to have a low viewer turnout due to its scheduling on the Saturday before Christmas.--which, critics argue, is a boost to frontrunner Clinton.
Indeed, Weaver also said was "disconcerting" that the move to limit the campaign's actions came on the very same day the campaign "reached two million individual contributions and received two of our most prominent endorsements."
Sanders' campaign and supporters will be commenting on the debate live under the hashtag #DebateWithBernie.