Protesters march against mass deportations in May 2014. (Photo: Joe Brusky/flickr/cc)
Apr 18, 2016
The U.S. Supreme Court reportedly appeared divided on a challenge to President Barack Obama's immigration executive actions, as a 90-minute oral argument session wrapped up on Monday afternoon.
The case, brought by 26 Republican-led states and spearheaded by Texas Governor Greg Abbott, concerns two deportation protections that would shield roughly 5 million undocumented parents of American citizens and legal residents, as well as about 100,000 people brought to the U.S. as children.
Now, with only eight members sitting on the panel following the death of Justice Antonin Scalia in February, the court could end in a 4-4 deadlock--which would leave in place a previous ruling by a lower court that blocked the plan, without setting a Supreme Court precedent.
Immigration and workers' rights groups on Monday called on the court to uphold the programs, known as the Deferred Action for Parents of Americans and Lawful Permanent Residents (DAPA) and Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA).
"It is a monumental day for millions of immigrant families across the U.S.," said Jose P. Garza, executive director of the Texas-based Workers Defense Project/Proyecta Defensa Laboral, which held a rally on the courthouse steps in Washington, D.C. as justices heard arguments inside.
"Today, Workers Defense Project members and their families are in D.C. to send a message to our national leaders that we're tired of our families being torn apart, and that we're united and stronger than ever," Garza said. "Texas is ground zero for DAPA/DACA, and nearly 70 percent of Texans support comprehensive immigration reform. Should the Supreme Court side with immigrant families, millions of hardworking individuals will be able to live without fear of being torn from their family, come out of the shadows, and strengthen our economy."
Service Employees International Union (SEIU) president Mary Kay Henry added in a statement, "Millions of American families know that President Obama's DAPA and expanded DACA stand on the right side of justice. We have faith that justice will prevail over the politics of hate and the Supreme Court will rule in favor of these programs."
Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Sonia Sotomayor, and Elena Kagan all voiced support for the administration's policy. Sotomayor noted that the government has limited resources to carry out deportations and said that the more than 4 million immigrants awaiting reprieve were "living in the shadows" and "are here whether we want them or not."
A decision is expected in June or July.
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. Join with us today! |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
The U.S. Supreme Court reportedly appeared divided on a challenge to President Barack Obama's immigration executive actions, as a 90-minute oral argument session wrapped up on Monday afternoon.
The case, brought by 26 Republican-led states and spearheaded by Texas Governor Greg Abbott, concerns two deportation protections that would shield roughly 5 million undocumented parents of American citizens and legal residents, as well as about 100,000 people brought to the U.S. as children.
Now, with only eight members sitting on the panel following the death of Justice Antonin Scalia in February, the court could end in a 4-4 deadlock--which would leave in place a previous ruling by a lower court that blocked the plan, without setting a Supreme Court precedent.
Immigration and workers' rights groups on Monday called on the court to uphold the programs, known as the Deferred Action for Parents of Americans and Lawful Permanent Residents (DAPA) and Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA).
"It is a monumental day for millions of immigrant families across the U.S.," said Jose P. Garza, executive director of the Texas-based Workers Defense Project/Proyecta Defensa Laboral, which held a rally on the courthouse steps in Washington, D.C. as justices heard arguments inside.
"Today, Workers Defense Project members and their families are in D.C. to send a message to our national leaders that we're tired of our families being torn apart, and that we're united and stronger than ever," Garza said. "Texas is ground zero for DAPA/DACA, and nearly 70 percent of Texans support comprehensive immigration reform. Should the Supreme Court side with immigrant families, millions of hardworking individuals will be able to live without fear of being torn from their family, come out of the shadows, and strengthen our economy."
Service Employees International Union (SEIU) president Mary Kay Henry added in a statement, "Millions of American families know that President Obama's DAPA and expanded DACA stand on the right side of justice. We have faith that justice will prevail over the politics of hate and the Supreme Court will rule in favor of these programs."
Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Sonia Sotomayor, and Elena Kagan all voiced support for the administration's policy. Sotomayor noted that the government has limited resources to carry out deportations and said that the more than 4 million immigrants awaiting reprieve were "living in the shadows" and "are here whether we want them or not."
A decision is expected in June or July.
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
The U.S. Supreme Court reportedly appeared divided on a challenge to President Barack Obama's immigration executive actions, as a 90-minute oral argument session wrapped up on Monday afternoon.
The case, brought by 26 Republican-led states and spearheaded by Texas Governor Greg Abbott, concerns two deportation protections that would shield roughly 5 million undocumented parents of American citizens and legal residents, as well as about 100,000 people brought to the U.S. as children.
Now, with only eight members sitting on the panel following the death of Justice Antonin Scalia in February, the court could end in a 4-4 deadlock--which would leave in place a previous ruling by a lower court that blocked the plan, without setting a Supreme Court precedent.
Immigration and workers' rights groups on Monday called on the court to uphold the programs, known as the Deferred Action for Parents of Americans and Lawful Permanent Residents (DAPA) and Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA).
"It is a monumental day for millions of immigrant families across the U.S.," said Jose P. Garza, executive director of the Texas-based Workers Defense Project/Proyecta Defensa Laboral, which held a rally on the courthouse steps in Washington, D.C. as justices heard arguments inside.
"Today, Workers Defense Project members and their families are in D.C. to send a message to our national leaders that we're tired of our families being torn apart, and that we're united and stronger than ever," Garza said. "Texas is ground zero for DAPA/DACA, and nearly 70 percent of Texans support comprehensive immigration reform. Should the Supreme Court side with immigrant families, millions of hardworking individuals will be able to live without fear of being torn from their family, come out of the shadows, and strengthen our economy."
Service Employees International Union (SEIU) president Mary Kay Henry added in a statement, "Millions of American families know that President Obama's DAPA and expanded DACA stand on the right side of justice. We have faith that justice will prevail over the politics of hate and the Supreme Court will rule in favor of these programs."
Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Sonia Sotomayor, and Elena Kagan all voiced support for the administration's policy. Sotomayor noted that the government has limited resources to carry out deportations and said that the more than 4 million immigrants awaiting reprieve were "living in the shadows" and "are here whether we want them or not."
A decision is expected in June or July.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.