Sanders Vows to Fight DNC for Progressive Agenda that Voters Want
The Vermont Senator said he will 'mobilize' his delegates if party platform does not reflect the bold progressive vision demanded by Democratic grassroots
The ongoing rift between Democratic elites and Bernie Sanders may come to a head at the convention in July, as the presidential hopeful has promised a "fight" if the party refuses to include "bold" progressive initiatives on the Democratic platform.
Such a move, the Vermont senator said, would be tantamount to "silencing" the "9 million voters who, during this nominating process, have indicated that they want to go beyond establishment politics and establishment economics."
"If we don't have the votes to get the nomination, were not going get the nomination. That becomes then the platform fight," Sanders told MSNBC's Rachel Maddow in an interview that aired on Friday, making it clear that his determination to take his campaign all the way to the convention in Philadelphia is about more than winning the presidency.
In a letter sent to Democratic Party chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-Fl.) on Friday, Sanders expressed concern that the the key committees charged with laying out the party rules and platform would be "stacked" with "Clinton loyalists."
According to the letter, Wasserman Schultz chose a scant 3 out of forty people that Sanders had recommended for the standing committees, while not one was chosen for the "very important" Rules Committee.
"If we are to have a unified party in the fall, no matter who wins the nomination, we cannot have a Democratic National Convention in which the views of millions of people who participated in the Democratic nominating process are unrepresented in the committee membership appointed by you, the Chair," Sanders wrote.
"That sends the very real message that the Democratic Party is not open to the millions of new people that our campaign has brought into the political process, does not want to hear new voices, and is unwilling to respect the broader base of people that this party needs to win over in November and beyond," he continued.
While a president is not bound to the party's official platform, as Sanders explained to Maddow, it is intended to reflect the ideals of the voter base.
"It does say something, it does reflect what the base of the Democratic party believes should be the future of this country, and I intend to do everything that I can to make that the most progressive document that we possibly can," he said. "And I think, by the way, that is the doc that the Democratic grassroots people really want to see."
However, the senator is concerned that party elites are already trying to sideline that point of view. In the letter, Sanders points out that the individuals tapped to lead the Platform and Rules Committees, respectively Connecticut Gov. Dannel Malloy and former Rep. Barney Frank of Massachusetts, have served as "aggressive attack surrogates" for Hillary Clinton throughout the campaign.
Doubting that either will "conduct committee proceeding in an even-handed manner," Sanders said that their appointment "suggests the standing committees are being established in an overtly partisan way meant to exclude the input of the voters who have supported my candidacy."
Over the course of the primary contest, the Democratic National Committee has repeatedly been accused of tipping the scales in Clinton's favor.
"It is my hope we can quickly resolve this in a fair way," the letter concludes. "If the process is set up to produce an unfair, one-sided result, we are prepared to mobilize our delegates to force as many votes as necessary to amend the platform and rules on the floor of the convention."
The warning comes as Clinton was declared the winner of the Guam primary on Saturday, after Sanders secured an upset victory in Indiana. The two Democratic candidates will next face off in West Virginia on Tuesday, May 10th.
Urgent. It's never been this bad.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission from the outset was simple. To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It’s never been this bad out there. And it’s never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed and doing some of its best and most important work, the threats we face are intensifying. Right now, with just four days to go in our Spring Campaign, we are not even halfway to our goal. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Can you make a gift right now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? There is no backup plan or rainy day fund. There is only you. —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
The ongoing rift between Democratic elites and Bernie Sanders may come to a head at the convention in July, as the presidential hopeful has promised a "fight" if the party refuses to include "bold" progressive initiatives on the Democratic platform.
Such a move, the Vermont senator said, would be tantamount to "silencing" the "9 million voters who, during this nominating process, have indicated that they want to go beyond establishment politics and establishment economics."
"If we don't have the votes to get the nomination, were not going get the nomination. That becomes then the platform fight," Sanders told MSNBC's Rachel Maddow in an interview that aired on Friday, making it clear that his determination to take his campaign all the way to the convention in Philadelphia is about more than winning the presidency.
In a letter sent to Democratic Party chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-Fl.) on Friday, Sanders expressed concern that the the key committees charged with laying out the party rules and platform would be "stacked" with "Clinton loyalists."
According to the letter, Wasserman Schultz chose a scant 3 out of forty people that Sanders had recommended for the standing committees, while not one was chosen for the "very important" Rules Committee.
"If we are to have a unified party in the fall, no matter who wins the nomination, we cannot have a Democratic National Convention in which the views of millions of people who participated in the Democratic nominating process are unrepresented in the committee membership appointed by you, the Chair," Sanders wrote.
"That sends the very real message that the Democratic Party is not open to the millions of new people that our campaign has brought into the political process, does not want to hear new voices, and is unwilling to respect the broader base of people that this party needs to win over in November and beyond," he continued.
While a president is not bound to the party's official platform, as Sanders explained to Maddow, it is intended to reflect the ideals of the voter base.
"It does say something, it does reflect what the base of the Democratic party believes should be the future of this country, and I intend to do everything that I can to make that the most progressive document that we possibly can," he said. "And I think, by the way, that is the doc that the Democratic grassroots people really want to see."
However, the senator is concerned that party elites are already trying to sideline that point of view. In the letter, Sanders points out that the individuals tapped to lead the Platform and Rules Committees, respectively Connecticut Gov. Dannel Malloy and former Rep. Barney Frank of Massachusetts, have served as "aggressive attack surrogates" for Hillary Clinton throughout the campaign.
Doubting that either will "conduct committee proceeding in an even-handed manner," Sanders said that their appointment "suggests the standing committees are being established in an overtly partisan way meant to exclude the input of the voters who have supported my candidacy."
Over the course of the primary contest, the Democratic National Committee has repeatedly been accused of tipping the scales in Clinton's favor.
"It is my hope we can quickly resolve this in a fair way," the letter concludes. "If the process is set up to produce an unfair, one-sided result, we are prepared to mobilize our delegates to force as many votes as necessary to amend the platform and rules on the floor of the convention."
The warning comes as Clinton was declared the winner of the Guam primary on Saturday, after Sanders secured an upset victory in Indiana. The two Democratic candidates will next face off in West Virginia on Tuesday, May 10th.
The ongoing rift between Democratic elites and Bernie Sanders may come to a head at the convention in July, as the presidential hopeful has promised a "fight" if the party refuses to include "bold" progressive initiatives on the Democratic platform.
Such a move, the Vermont senator said, would be tantamount to "silencing" the "9 million voters who, during this nominating process, have indicated that they want to go beyond establishment politics and establishment economics."
"If we don't have the votes to get the nomination, were not going get the nomination. That becomes then the platform fight," Sanders told MSNBC's Rachel Maddow in an interview that aired on Friday, making it clear that his determination to take his campaign all the way to the convention in Philadelphia is about more than winning the presidency.
In a letter sent to Democratic Party chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-Fl.) on Friday, Sanders expressed concern that the the key committees charged with laying out the party rules and platform would be "stacked" with "Clinton loyalists."
According to the letter, Wasserman Schultz chose a scant 3 out of forty people that Sanders had recommended for the standing committees, while not one was chosen for the "very important" Rules Committee.
"If we are to have a unified party in the fall, no matter who wins the nomination, we cannot have a Democratic National Convention in which the views of millions of people who participated in the Democratic nominating process are unrepresented in the committee membership appointed by you, the Chair," Sanders wrote.
"That sends the very real message that the Democratic Party is not open to the millions of new people that our campaign has brought into the political process, does not want to hear new voices, and is unwilling to respect the broader base of people that this party needs to win over in November and beyond," he continued.
While a president is not bound to the party's official platform, as Sanders explained to Maddow, it is intended to reflect the ideals of the voter base.
"It does say something, it does reflect what the base of the Democratic party believes should be the future of this country, and I intend to do everything that I can to make that the most progressive document that we possibly can," he said. "And I think, by the way, that is the doc that the Democratic grassroots people really want to see."
However, the senator is concerned that party elites are already trying to sideline that point of view. In the letter, Sanders points out that the individuals tapped to lead the Platform and Rules Committees, respectively Connecticut Gov. Dannel Malloy and former Rep. Barney Frank of Massachusetts, have served as "aggressive attack surrogates" for Hillary Clinton throughout the campaign.
Doubting that either will "conduct committee proceeding in an even-handed manner," Sanders said that their appointment "suggests the standing committees are being established in an overtly partisan way meant to exclude the input of the voters who have supported my candidacy."
Over the course of the primary contest, the Democratic National Committee has repeatedly been accused of tipping the scales in Clinton's favor.
"It is my hope we can quickly resolve this in a fair way," the letter concludes. "If the process is set up to produce an unfair, one-sided result, we are prepared to mobilize our delegates to force as many votes as necessary to amend the platform and rules on the floor of the convention."
The warning comes as Clinton was declared the winner of the Guam primary on Saturday, after Sanders secured an upset victory in Indiana. The two Democratic candidates will next face off in West Virginia on Tuesday, May 10th.