"This decision has the disappointing result of keeping the full truth about the CIA torture program from the American public, and we're considering our options for appeal." (Photo: Justin Norman/flickr/cc)
May 13, 2016
A federal appeals court on Friday rejected a lawsuit that called for the full release of the U.S. Senate's report on the CIA's post-September 11 abuse and torture of detainees.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit said the report isn't subject to Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests--ruling against the ACLU, which filed the lawsuit seeking publication of the 6,000-page document.
"This decision has the disappointing result of keeping the full truth about the CIA torture program from the American public, and we're considering our options for appeal," said Hina Shamsi, director of the ACLU's National Security project.
Congressional documents are exempt from FOIA rules, but the ACLU argued that the Senate Intelligence Committee gave up control over the report when it handed it over to the White House and other agencies.
The court disagreed. Judge Harry Edwards wrote for the unanimous three-member panel that there was "clear intent by the Senate committee to maintain continuous control over its work product."
Shamsi added that the judges should have "credited the committee's clear intent to disseminate the torture report widely to the executive branch. Instead, the opinion wrongly relies on a years-old agreement between the committee and the CIA that didn't apply to the final version of the report. The committee later sent the report to agencies, with express instructions that it be read and used."
An executive summary of the document, often referred to as the "torture report," was released in 2014. Among its key findings, the Senate Intelligence Committee concluded that the CIA misled policymakers and the public about the nature of the program. The report detailed the agency's brutal treatment of detainees, including through beatings, shackling, death threats, sleep deprivation, waterboarding, and sexual assault.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Our Summer Campaign is now underway, and there’s never been a more urgent time for Common Dreams to be as vigilant as possible. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
A federal appeals court on Friday rejected a lawsuit that called for the full release of the U.S. Senate's report on the CIA's post-September 11 abuse and torture of detainees.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit said the report isn't subject to Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests--ruling against the ACLU, which filed the lawsuit seeking publication of the 6,000-page document.
"This decision has the disappointing result of keeping the full truth about the CIA torture program from the American public, and we're considering our options for appeal," said Hina Shamsi, director of the ACLU's National Security project.
Congressional documents are exempt from FOIA rules, but the ACLU argued that the Senate Intelligence Committee gave up control over the report when it handed it over to the White House and other agencies.
The court disagreed. Judge Harry Edwards wrote for the unanimous three-member panel that there was "clear intent by the Senate committee to maintain continuous control over its work product."
Shamsi added that the judges should have "credited the committee's clear intent to disseminate the torture report widely to the executive branch. Instead, the opinion wrongly relies on a years-old agreement between the committee and the CIA that didn't apply to the final version of the report. The committee later sent the report to agencies, with express instructions that it be read and used."
An executive summary of the document, often referred to as the "torture report," was released in 2014. Among its key findings, the Senate Intelligence Committee concluded that the CIA misled policymakers and the public about the nature of the program. The report detailed the agency's brutal treatment of detainees, including through beatings, shackling, death threats, sleep deprivation, waterboarding, and sexual assault.
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
A federal appeals court on Friday rejected a lawsuit that called for the full release of the U.S. Senate's report on the CIA's post-September 11 abuse and torture of detainees.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit said the report isn't subject to Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests--ruling against the ACLU, which filed the lawsuit seeking publication of the 6,000-page document.
"This decision has the disappointing result of keeping the full truth about the CIA torture program from the American public, and we're considering our options for appeal," said Hina Shamsi, director of the ACLU's National Security project.
Congressional documents are exempt from FOIA rules, but the ACLU argued that the Senate Intelligence Committee gave up control over the report when it handed it over to the White House and other agencies.
The court disagreed. Judge Harry Edwards wrote for the unanimous three-member panel that there was "clear intent by the Senate committee to maintain continuous control over its work product."
Shamsi added that the judges should have "credited the committee's clear intent to disseminate the torture report widely to the executive branch. Instead, the opinion wrongly relies on a years-old agreement between the committee and the CIA that didn't apply to the final version of the report. The committee later sent the report to agencies, with express instructions that it be read and used."
An executive summary of the document, often referred to as the "torture report," was released in 2014. Among its key findings, the Senate Intelligence Committee concluded that the CIA misled policymakers and the public about the nature of the program. The report detailed the agency's brutal treatment of detainees, including through beatings, shackling, death threats, sleep deprivation, waterboarding, and sexual assault.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.