
The bipartisan Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act was approved by unanimous consent in the U.S. Senate on Tuesday. (Photo: Glyn Lowe/cc/flickr)
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
The bipartisan Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act was approved by unanimous consent in the U.S. Senate on Tuesday. (Photo: Glyn Lowe/cc/flickr)
Setting up a likely veto fight and opening a potential Pandora's Box, the U.S. Senate on Tuesday passed a bill that allows victims of 9/11 to sue Saudi Arabia for any role the government may have played in the attacks.
The bipartisan Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act was approved by unanimous consent, despite protest from President Barack Obama, who threatened to veto the bill.
Obama recently argued, "If we open up the possibility that individuals...can routinely start suing other governments, then we are also opening up the United States to being continually sued by individuals in other countries." Some interpreted this as a veiled reference to the United States' controversial anti-terror policy, including its broad use of killer drone strikes.
The bill amends the federal judicial code to narrow the scope to permit American victims of U.S.-based attacks, or their families, to sue foreign governments in U.S. courts for aiding an act of terrorism.
White House press secretary Josh Earnest reiterated Obama's opposition on Tuesday, telling reporters that "it's difficult to imagine the president signing this legislation."
Sen. Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.), who sponsored the legislation along with Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas), was undettered. "I think we easily get the two-thirds override if the president should veto," Schumer said.
Lawmakers in the House of Representatives have introduced their own version of the bill.
Both Democratic presidential candidates Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton also broke with the president in support of the bill. Sanders went so far as to call for the declassification of the controversial "28 pages" of the 9/11 Commission report, which is said to detail Saudi ties to the 2001 terrorist attack.
James Clapper, Obama's director of National Intelligence, has indicated that document will be made public as early as June--which could prove to be problematic for the U.S.'s Gulf ally.
"Look, if the Saudis did not participate in this terrorism, they have nothing to fear about going to court," Schumer said Tuesday. "If they did, they should be held accountable."
Donald Trump’s attacks on democracy, justice, and a free press are escalating — putting everything we stand for at risk. We believe a better world is possible, but we can’t get there without your support. Common Dreams stands apart. We answer only to you — our readers, activists, and changemakers — not to billionaires or corporations. Our independence allows us to cover the vital stories that others won’t, spotlighting movements for peace, equality, and human rights. Right now, our work faces unprecedented challenges. Misinformation is spreading, journalists are under attack, and financial pressures are mounting. As a reader-supported, nonprofit newsroom, your support is crucial to keep this journalism alive. Whatever you can give — $10, $25, or $100 — helps us stay strong and responsive when the world needs us most. Together, we’ll continue to build the independent, courageous journalism our movement relies on. Thank you for being part of this community. |
Setting up a likely veto fight and opening a potential Pandora's Box, the U.S. Senate on Tuesday passed a bill that allows victims of 9/11 to sue Saudi Arabia for any role the government may have played in the attacks.
The bipartisan Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act was approved by unanimous consent, despite protest from President Barack Obama, who threatened to veto the bill.
Obama recently argued, "If we open up the possibility that individuals...can routinely start suing other governments, then we are also opening up the United States to being continually sued by individuals in other countries." Some interpreted this as a veiled reference to the United States' controversial anti-terror policy, including its broad use of killer drone strikes.
The bill amends the federal judicial code to narrow the scope to permit American victims of U.S.-based attacks, or their families, to sue foreign governments in U.S. courts for aiding an act of terrorism.
White House press secretary Josh Earnest reiterated Obama's opposition on Tuesday, telling reporters that "it's difficult to imagine the president signing this legislation."
Sen. Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.), who sponsored the legislation along with Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas), was undettered. "I think we easily get the two-thirds override if the president should veto," Schumer said.
Lawmakers in the House of Representatives have introduced their own version of the bill.
Both Democratic presidential candidates Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton also broke with the president in support of the bill. Sanders went so far as to call for the declassification of the controversial "28 pages" of the 9/11 Commission report, which is said to detail Saudi ties to the 2001 terrorist attack.
James Clapper, Obama's director of National Intelligence, has indicated that document will be made public as early as June--which could prove to be problematic for the U.S.'s Gulf ally.
"Look, if the Saudis did not participate in this terrorism, they have nothing to fear about going to court," Schumer said Tuesday. "If they did, they should be held accountable."
Setting up a likely veto fight and opening a potential Pandora's Box, the U.S. Senate on Tuesday passed a bill that allows victims of 9/11 to sue Saudi Arabia for any role the government may have played in the attacks.
The bipartisan Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act was approved by unanimous consent, despite protest from President Barack Obama, who threatened to veto the bill.
Obama recently argued, "If we open up the possibility that individuals...can routinely start suing other governments, then we are also opening up the United States to being continually sued by individuals in other countries." Some interpreted this as a veiled reference to the United States' controversial anti-terror policy, including its broad use of killer drone strikes.
The bill amends the federal judicial code to narrow the scope to permit American victims of U.S.-based attacks, or their families, to sue foreign governments in U.S. courts for aiding an act of terrorism.
White House press secretary Josh Earnest reiterated Obama's opposition on Tuesday, telling reporters that "it's difficult to imagine the president signing this legislation."
Sen. Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.), who sponsored the legislation along with Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas), was undettered. "I think we easily get the two-thirds override if the president should veto," Schumer said.
Lawmakers in the House of Representatives have introduced their own version of the bill.
Both Democratic presidential candidates Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton also broke with the president in support of the bill. Sanders went so far as to call for the declassification of the controversial "28 pages" of the 9/11 Commission report, which is said to detail Saudi ties to the 2001 terrorist attack.
James Clapper, Obama's director of National Intelligence, has indicated that document will be made public as early as June--which could prove to be problematic for the U.S.'s Gulf ally.
"Look, if the Saudis did not participate in this terrorism, they have nothing to fear about going to court," Schumer said Tuesday. "If they did, they should be held accountable."