SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Dems Reportedly Asking: Has Debbie Wasserman Schultz Become 'Too Toxic'?
'There is a lot of sentiment that replacing her would be a good idea,' said one anonymous source
May 25, 2016
Democratic Party insiders are reportedly discussing whether to remove Debbie Wasserman Schultz as chairwoman of the Democratic National Committee (DNC) before this summer's nominating convention in Philadelphia.
"There's a strong sentiment that the current situation is untenable and can only be fixed by her leaving," a senior Democratic aide told The Hill. "There's too much water under the bridge for her to be a neutral arbiter."
"There have been a lot of meetings over the past 48 hours about what color plate do we deliver Debbie Wasserman Schultz's head on."
--Pro-Clinton Democratic senator
Rep. Wasserman Schultz, of Florida, has faced accusations of displaying a pro-Hillary Clinton bias throughout the 2016 campaign. These tensions came to a head last week, after Nevada's Democratic convention devolved into chaos and gave Bernie Sanders supporters more evidence that the primary process has been rigged in favor of the establishment candidate.
Over the weekend, Sanders endorsed Wasserman Schultz's primary opponent, Tim Canova, and said if he was elected president, "she would not be reappointed to be chair of the DNC."
Now, The Hill reports, Democrats backing Clinton "worry Wasserman Schultz has become too divisive a figure to unify the party in 2016, which they say is crucial to defeating presumptive GOP nominee Donald Trump in November."
According to The Hill:
There is no indication Wasserman Schultz [...] has any plans to leave her post. And Senate sources stress that a final decision won't be made until Clinton and Sanders negotiate some type of deal aimed at healing the party. President Obama, who selected Wasserman Schultz as chairwoman in 2011, is expected to play a major role in any such talks.
The Clinton and Sanders campaigns have already struck a deal with Wasserman Schultz to limit her role in the convention's platform committee.
Under DNC rules, she could have appointed all 15 members of the platform committee but instead picked only four. Clinton got to fill six positions, and Sanders chose five.
The concession, however, may not be enough to keep her in the job through the Democratic National Convention.
Indeed, a pro-Clinton Democratic senator told The Hill: "There have been a lot of meetings over the past 48 hours about what color plate do we deliver Debbie Wasserman Schultz's head on."
On the condition of anonymity, a senior Senate Democratic source said to CNN: "There is a lot of sentiment that replacing her would be a good idea. It is being discussed quietly among Democratic senators on the floor, in the cloakroom and in lunches."
Both The Hill and CNN cite prominent Democrats--including House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi and Sen. Barbara Mikulski--who still support Wasserman Schultz. "That's not going to happen. I certainly wouldn't let it happen," Sen. Bill Nelson (D-Fla.) said of the prospect of Wasserman Schultz leaving the DNC before the convention.
But another senior Democratic aide, admitting there had been only informal discussion among senators and no coordinated effort so far, offered a simple assessment of the bottom line. "The question is," the source said, "Has she become too toxic?"
In an op-ed published Saturday, Bill Moyers and Michael Winship said yes.
"Unless she steps down now or Hillary Clinton has her removed, Philadelphia will be dominated by someone who represents everything that has gone wrong with the Democratic Party and Washington," Moyers and Winship wrote of the DNC chairwoman. "At the convention's opening session, Debbie Wasserman Schultz will be bringing the gavel down squarely on progressive hopes of returning the party to its legacy as champion of working people and the dispossessed."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Deirdre Fulton
Deirdre Fulton is a former Common Dreams senior editor and staff writer. Previously she worked as an editor and writer for the Portland Phoenix and the Boston Phoenix, where she was honored by the New England Press Association and the Association of Alternative Newsweeklies. A Boston University graduate, Deirdre is a co-founder of the Maine-based Lorem Ipsum Theater Collective and the PortFringe theater festival. She writes young adult fiction in her spare time.
bernie sandersbill moyersdebbie wasserman schultzdemocratic partyelection 2016hillary clintonmichael winship
Democratic Party insiders are reportedly discussing whether to remove Debbie Wasserman Schultz as chairwoman of the Democratic National Committee (DNC) before this summer's nominating convention in Philadelphia.
"There's a strong sentiment that the current situation is untenable and can only be fixed by her leaving," a senior Democratic aide told The Hill. "There's too much water under the bridge for her to be a neutral arbiter."
"There have been a lot of meetings over the past 48 hours about what color plate do we deliver Debbie Wasserman Schultz's head on."
--Pro-Clinton Democratic senator
Rep. Wasserman Schultz, of Florida, has faced accusations of displaying a pro-Hillary Clinton bias throughout the 2016 campaign. These tensions came to a head last week, after Nevada's Democratic convention devolved into chaos and gave Bernie Sanders supporters more evidence that the primary process has been rigged in favor of the establishment candidate.
Over the weekend, Sanders endorsed Wasserman Schultz's primary opponent, Tim Canova, and said if he was elected president, "she would not be reappointed to be chair of the DNC."
Now, The Hill reports, Democrats backing Clinton "worry Wasserman Schultz has become too divisive a figure to unify the party in 2016, which they say is crucial to defeating presumptive GOP nominee Donald Trump in November."
According to The Hill:
There is no indication Wasserman Schultz [...] has any plans to leave her post. And Senate sources stress that a final decision won't be made until Clinton and Sanders negotiate some type of deal aimed at healing the party. President Obama, who selected Wasserman Schultz as chairwoman in 2011, is expected to play a major role in any such talks.
The Clinton and Sanders campaigns have already struck a deal with Wasserman Schultz to limit her role in the convention's platform committee.
Under DNC rules, she could have appointed all 15 members of the platform committee but instead picked only four. Clinton got to fill six positions, and Sanders chose five.
The concession, however, may not be enough to keep her in the job through the Democratic National Convention.
Indeed, a pro-Clinton Democratic senator told The Hill: "There have been a lot of meetings over the past 48 hours about what color plate do we deliver Debbie Wasserman Schultz's head on."
On the condition of anonymity, a senior Senate Democratic source said to CNN: "There is a lot of sentiment that replacing her would be a good idea. It is being discussed quietly among Democratic senators on the floor, in the cloakroom and in lunches."
Both The Hill and CNN cite prominent Democrats--including House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi and Sen. Barbara Mikulski--who still support Wasserman Schultz. "That's not going to happen. I certainly wouldn't let it happen," Sen. Bill Nelson (D-Fla.) said of the prospect of Wasserman Schultz leaving the DNC before the convention.
But another senior Democratic aide, admitting there had been only informal discussion among senators and no coordinated effort so far, offered a simple assessment of the bottom line. "The question is," the source said, "Has she become too toxic?"
In an op-ed published Saturday, Bill Moyers and Michael Winship said yes.
"Unless she steps down now or Hillary Clinton has her removed, Philadelphia will be dominated by someone who represents everything that has gone wrong with the Democratic Party and Washington," Moyers and Winship wrote of the DNC chairwoman. "At the convention's opening session, Debbie Wasserman Schultz will be bringing the gavel down squarely on progressive hopes of returning the party to its legacy as champion of working people and the dispossessed."
Deirdre Fulton
Deirdre Fulton is a former Common Dreams senior editor and staff writer. Previously she worked as an editor and writer for the Portland Phoenix and the Boston Phoenix, where she was honored by the New England Press Association and the Association of Alternative Newsweeklies. A Boston University graduate, Deirdre is a co-founder of the Maine-based Lorem Ipsum Theater Collective and the PortFringe theater festival. She writes young adult fiction in her spare time.
Democratic Party insiders are reportedly discussing whether to remove Debbie Wasserman Schultz as chairwoman of the Democratic National Committee (DNC) before this summer's nominating convention in Philadelphia.
"There's a strong sentiment that the current situation is untenable and can only be fixed by her leaving," a senior Democratic aide told The Hill. "There's too much water under the bridge for her to be a neutral arbiter."
"There have been a lot of meetings over the past 48 hours about what color plate do we deliver Debbie Wasserman Schultz's head on."
--Pro-Clinton Democratic senator
Rep. Wasserman Schultz, of Florida, has faced accusations of displaying a pro-Hillary Clinton bias throughout the 2016 campaign. These tensions came to a head last week, after Nevada's Democratic convention devolved into chaos and gave Bernie Sanders supporters more evidence that the primary process has been rigged in favor of the establishment candidate.
Over the weekend, Sanders endorsed Wasserman Schultz's primary opponent, Tim Canova, and said if he was elected president, "she would not be reappointed to be chair of the DNC."
Now, The Hill reports, Democrats backing Clinton "worry Wasserman Schultz has become too divisive a figure to unify the party in 2016, which they say is crucial to defeating presumptive GOP nominee Donald Trump in November."
According to The Hill:
There is no indication Wasserman Schultz [...] has any plans to leave her post. And Senate sources stress that a final decision won't be made until Clinton and Sanders negotiate some type of deal aimed at healing the party. President Obama, who selected Wasserman Schultz as chairwoman in 2011, is expected to play a major role in any such talks.
The Clinton and Sanders campaigns have already struck a deal with Wasserman Schultz to limit her role in the convention's platform committee.
Under DNC rules, she could have appointed all 15 members of the platform committee but instead picked only four. Clinton got to fill six positions, and Sanders chose five.
The concession, however, may not be enough to keep her in the job through the Democratic National Convention.
Indeed, a pro-Clinton Democratic senator told The Hill: "There have been a lot of meetings over the past 48 hours about what color plate do we deliver Debbie Wasserman Schultz's head on."
On the condition of anonymity, a senior Senate Democratic source said to CNN: "There is a lot of sentiment that replacing her would be a good idea. It is being discussed quietly among Democratic senators on the floor, in the cloakroom and in lunches."
Both The Hill and CNN cite prominent Democrats--including House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi and Sen. Barbara Mikulski--who still support Wasserman Schultz. "That's not going to happen. I certainly wouldn't let it happen," Sen. Bill Nelson (D-Fla.) said of the prospect of Wasserman Schultz leaving the DNC before the convention.
But another senior Democratic aide, admitting there had been only informal discussion among senators and no coordinated effort so far, offered a simple assessment of the bottom line. "The question is," the source said, "Has she become too toxic?"
In an op-ed published Saturday, Bill Moyers and Michael Winship said yes.
"Unless she steps down now or Hillary Clinton has her removed, Philadelphia will be dominated by someone who represents everything that has gone wrong with the Democratic Party and Washington," Moyers and Winship wrote of the DNC chairwoman. "At the convention's opening session, Debbie Wasserman Schultz will be bringing the gavel down squarely on progressive hopes of returning the party to its legacy as champion of working people and the dispossessed."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.