SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
US House Squashes Yet Another Attempt to Expand Patriot Act Powers
Orwellian "Anti-terrorism Information Sharing is Strength Act" fails to garner two-thirds majority
Jul 12, 2016
A bill critics said would expand Patriot Act surveillance went down in the U.S. House Monday night after failing to garner the necessary two-thirds support of the chamber.
The "Anti-terrorism Information Sharing is Strength Act," HR 5606, would have amended the USA Patriot Act to allow financial institutions to share information with law enforcement agencies and one another regarding suspected "activities that may involve terrorist acts, money laundering activities, or a specified unlawful activity."
Previously, such sharing was allowed regarding only "terrorist acts or money laundering activities."
The final vote on the bill, which was considered under a fast-track process that required it to amass a two-thirds majority for passage, was 229-177.
Libertarian Congressman Justin Amash (R-Mich.) led the opposition, saying the legislation expanded the Patriot Act to let the government "demand info on any American [without] due process."
According to The Hill:
The House Liberty Caucus, chaired by Rep. Justin Amash (R-Mich.), said the bill should have been considered in committee and warned it could allow the government to access Americans' financial information based on what appears to be suspicious activity.
The caucus also panned the decision to consider the bill, which was introduced two weeks ago, under the fast-track procedure which also prohibits amendments.
"The Patriot Act should not be casually expanded," the caucus said in a statement. "In short, if the regulations issued under the bill are consistent with current regulations, H.R. 5606 will permit the government to demand information on any American from any financial institution merely upon reasonable suspicion."
The bill--and its Orwellian title--also drew the attention of privacy advocates like digital rights group Fight for the Future.
This isn't the only recent attempt by Congress to expand the snooping powers of the Patriot Act. The U.S. Senate failed to pass a similar effort last month.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Deirdre Fulton
Deirdre Fulton is a former Common Dreams senior editor and staff writer. Previously she worked as an editor and writer for the Portland Phoenix and the Boston Phoenix, where she was honored by the New England Press Association and the Association of Alternative Newsweeklies. A Boston University graduate, Deirdre is a co-founder of the Maine-based Lorem Ipsum Theater Collective and the PortFringe theater festival. She writes young adult fiction in her spare time.
A bill critics said would expand Patriot Act surveillance went down in the U.S. House Monday night after failing to garner the necessary two-thirds support of the chamber.
The "Anti-terrorism Information Sharing is Strength Act," HR 5606, would have amended the USA Patriot Act to allow financial institutions to share information with law enforcement agencies and one another regarding suspected "activities that may involve terrorist acts, money laundering activities, or a specified unlawful activity."
Previously, such sharing was allowed regarding only "terrorist acts or money laundering activities."
The final vote on the bill, which was considered under a fast-track process that required it to amass a two-thirds majority for passage, was 229-177.
Libertarian Congressman Justin Amash (R-Mich.) led the opposition, saying the legislation expanded the Patriot Act to let the government "demand info on any American [without] due process."
According to The Hill:
The House Liberty Caucus, chaired by Rep. Justin Amash (R-Mich.), said the bill should have been considered in committee and warned it could allow the government to access Americans' financial information based on what appears to be suspicious activity.
The caucus also panned the decision to consider the bill, which was introduced two weeks ago, under the fast-track procedure which also prohibits amendments.
"The Patriot Act should not be casually expanded," the caucus said in a statement. "In short, if the regulations issued under the bill are consistent with current regulations, H.R. 5606 will permit the government to demand information on any American from any financial institution merely upon reasonable suspicion."
The bill--and its Orwellian title--also drew the attention of privacy advocates like digital rights group Fight for the Future.
This isn't the only recent attempt by Congress to expand the snooping powers of the Patriot Act. The U.S. Senate failed to pass a similar effort last month.
Deirdre Fulton
Deirdre Fulton is a former Common Dreams senior editor and staff writer. Previously she worked as an editor and writer for the Portland Phoenix and the Boston Phoenix, where she was honored by the New England Press Association and the Association of Alternative Newsweeklies. A Boston University graduate, Deirdre is a co-founder of the Maine-based Lorem Ipsum Theater Collective and the PortFringe theater festival. She writes young adult fiction in her spare time.
A bill critics said would expand Patriot Act surveillance went down in the U.S. House Monday night after failing to garner the necessary two-thirds support of the chamber.
The "Anti-terrorism Information Sharing is Strength Act," HR 5606, would have amended the USA Patriot Act to allow financial institutions to share information with law enforcement agencies and one another regarding suspected "activities that may involve terrorist acts, money laundering activities, or a specified unlawful activity."
Previously, such sharing was allowed regarding only "terrorist acts or money laundering activities."
The final vote on the bill, which was considered under a fast-track process that required it to amass a two-thirds majority for passage, was 229-177.
Libertarian Congressman Justin Amash (R-Mich.) led the opposition, saying the legislation expanded the Patriot Act to let the government "demand info on any American [without] due process."
According to The Hill:
The House Liberty Caucus, chaired by Rep. Justin Amash (R-Mich.), said the bill should have been considered in committee and warned it could allow the government to access Americans' financial information based on what appears to be suspicious activity.
The caucus also panned the decision to consider the bill, which was introduced two weeks ago, under the fast-track procedure which also prohibits amendments.
"The Patriot Act should not be casually expanded," the caucus said in a statement. "In short, if the regulations issued under the bill are consistent with current regulations, H.R. 5606 will permit the government to demand information on any American from any financial institution merely upon reasonable suspicion."
The bill--and its Orwellian title--also drew the attention of privacy advocates like digital rights group Fight for the Future.
This isn't the only recent attempt by Congress to expand the snooping powers of the Patriot Act. The U.S. Senate failed to pass a similar effort last month.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.