SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
"This report diminishes the committee," Snowden responded. (Photo: Reuters)
House Intel Report on Snowden Dismissed as 'Laughable' Smear Attempt
'Their report is so artlessly distorted that it would be amusing if it weren't such a serious act of bad faith.'
Sep 16, 2016
The U.S. House Intelligence Committee on Thursday released an unclassified summary of its report on National Security Administration (NSA) whistleblower Edward Snowden, who exposed the agency's mass surveillance operations in 2013, in which the committee roundly condemns Snowden as "not a whistleblower" and a "serial fabricator."
"The American people deserve better. This report diminishes the [House Intelligence] committee."
--Edward SnowdenThe three-page summary of the report (pdf), whose publication appeared timed for the nationwide release of Oliver Stone's biopic of Snowden, was widely decried as an orchestrated smear attempt--intended to discredit Snowden just as Stone's sympathetic portrayal of the whistleblower and a growing campaign calling for a presidential pardon both make headlines nationwide.
"By total coincidence, the report they claim was years in the making comes out right as the 'Snowden' movie does," commented Trevor Timm, co-founder and the executive director of the Freedom of the Press Foundation.
"The committee supposed to oversee the NSA is very upset at the movie about the guy who started actual NSA oversight," addedThe Intercept reporter Alex Emmons.
The report appeared to focus on supposed workplace transgressions Snowden committed while working for the NSA, such as cc'ing a higher-level manager on an email thread reporting a critical problem with CIA software, "doctoring performance evaluations" when he was in fact reporting that the evaluation program was susceptible to hacking, and calling in sick when he was leaking the documents detailing the NSA's extensive global wiretapping of private citizens.
Many progressive voices were amused that the charges contained in the report summary were so sparse: "Wait. Is that it? If this three-page report from the House Intelligence Committee on Snowden is all the dirt they have on them, I'm disappointed," wrote ACLU principal technologist Christopher Soghoian on Twitter.
When it was pointed out that the summary was only the unclassified portion of the report, Soghoian responded, "That's true. Perhaps they reveal in the classified report that he left the office at 4:55 a few times and stole paperclips."
The report also suggests Snowden is a foreign agent, referring to him at points as a "guest of the Kremlin" and "traveling to Hong Kong with stolen secrets." In one portion, the report alleges that a Russian official said outright that Snowden shared secrets with the Russian government--which Snowden notes is "speculation presented as fact."
In fact, Snowden slammed every critique contained in the report's summary in a scathing series of Tweets:
\u201cAfter "two years of investigation," the government charges... I faked a sick day and have a GED? Did they not watch the Guardian interview?\u201d— Edward Snowden (@Edward Snowden) 1473974322
\u201c@Snowden Their report is so artlessly distorted that it would be amusing if it weren't such a serious act of bad faith. Let's take examples:\u201d— Edward Snowden (@Edward Snowden) 1473974322
\u201c@Snowden The claim I exfiltrated data for journos 8 months prior to Clapper? False. That was HEARTBEAT (see film), an approved data handler.\u201d— Edward Snowden (@Edward Snowden) 1473974322
\u201c@Snowden HEARTBEAT, which seems to be the source of their 1.5m number, was explicited authorized by two levels of my management. I built it.\u201d— Edward Snowden (@Edward Snowden) 1473974322
\u201c@Snowden The committee seems to intentionally conflate my authorized government work with my unauthorized whistleblowing. Diminishes them.\u201d— Edward Snowden (@Edward Snowden) 1473974322
\u201c@Snowden That NSA's programs were legal and I just didn't understand the nuance? The courts disagree: https://t.co/im7EkRBOBr\u201d— Edward Snowden (@Edward Snowden) 1473974322
\u201c@Snowden Claim: I reported a critical problem (software updates taking field sites offline) to senior management, and was reprimanded. True!\u201d— Edward Snowden (@Edward Snowden) 1473974322
\u201cThe claim I "doctored performance evaluations?" This one is amazing: I reported an XSS (hacking) vulnerability in CIA annual review system.\u201d— Edward Snowden (@Edward Snowden) 1473974322
\u201cArmy held me for weeks in a special unit for convalescence before separation. I left on crutches. They don't do that for "shin splints."\u201d— Edward Snowden (@Edward Snowden) 1473974322
\u201cThat Russian guy? Speculation presented as fact. NPR accidentally omitted the speaker's "Ya dumayu" (English: "I think") in the translation.\u201d— Edward Snowden (@Edward Snowden) 1473974322
\u201c@Snowden The original audio, which includes the "Ya dumayu," is available at the same link as the source article.\u201d— Edward Snowden (@Edward Snowden) 1473974704
\u201cI could go on. Bottom line: after "two years of investigation," the American people deserve better. This report diminishes the committee.\u201d— Edward Snowden (@Edward Snowden) 1473975117
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
The U.S. House Intelligence Committee on Thursday released an unclassified summary of its report on National Security Administration (NSA) whistleblower Edward Snowden, who exposed the agency's mass surveillance operations in 2013, in which the committee roundly condemns Snowden as "not a whistleblower" and a "serial fabricator."
"The American people deserve better. This report diminishes the [House Intelligence] committee."
--Edward SnowdenThe three-page summary of the report (pdf), whose publication appeared timed for the nationwide release of Oliver Stone's biopic of Snowden, was widely decried as an orchestrated smear attempt--intended to discredit Snowden just as Stone's sympathetic portrayal of the whistleblower and a growing campaign calling for a presidential pardon both make headlines nationwide.
"By total coincidence, the report they claim was years in the making comes out right as the 'Snowden' movie does," commented Trevor Timm, co-founder and the executive director of the Freedom of the Press Foundation.
"The committee supposed to oversee the NSA is very upset at the movie about the guy who started actual NSA oversight," addedThe Intercept reporter Alex Emmons.
The report appeared to focus on supposed workplace transgressions Snowden committed while working for the NSA, such as cc'ing a higher-level manager on an email thread reporting a critical problem with CIA software, "doctoring performance evaluations" when he was in fact reporting that the evaluation program was susceptible to hacking, and calling in sick when he was leaking the documents detailing the NSA's extensive global wiretapping of private citizens.
Many progressive voices were amused that the charges contained in the report summary were so sparse: "Wait. Is that it? If this three-page report from the House Intelligence Committee on Snowden is all the dirt they have on them, I'm disappointed," wrote ACLU principal technologist Christopher Soghoian on Twitter.
When it was pointed out that the summary was only the unclassified portion of the report, Soghoian responded, "That's true. Perhaps they reveal in the classified report that he left the office at 4:55 a few times and stole paperclips."
The report also suggests Snowden is a foreign agent, referring to him at points as a "guest of the Kremlin" and "traveling to Hong Kong with stolen secrets." In one portion, the report alleges that a Russian official said outright that Snowden shared secrets with the Russian government--which Snowden notes is "speculation presented as fact."
In fact, Snowden slammed every critique contained in the report's summary in a scathing series of Tweets:
\u201cAfter "two years of investigation," the government charges... I faked a sick day and have a GED? Did they not watch the Guardian interview?\u201d— Edward Snowden (@Edward Snowden) 1473974322
\u201c@Snowden Their report is so artlessly distorted that it would be amusing if it weren't such a serious act of bad faith. Let's take examples:\u201d— Edward Snowden (@Edward Snowden) 1473974322
\u201c@Snowden The claim I exfiltrated data for journos 8 months prior to Clapper? False. That was HEARTBEAT (see film), an approved data handler.\u201d— Edward Snowden (@Edward Snowden) 1473974322
\u201c@Snowden HEARTBEAT, which seems to be the source of their 1.5m number, was explicited authorized by two levels of my management. I built it.\u201d— Edward Snowden (@Edward Snowden) 1473974322
\u201c@Snowden The committee seems to intentionally conflate my authorized government work with my unauthorized whistleblowing. Diminishes them.\u201d— Edward Snowden (@Edward Snowden) 1473974322
\u201c@Snowden That NSA's programs were legal and I just didn't understand the nuance? The courts disagree: https://t.co/im7EkRBOBr\u201d— Edward Snowden (@Edward Snowden) 1473974322
\u201c@Snowden Claim: I reported a critical problem (software updates taking field sites offline) to senior management, and was reprimanded. True!\u201d— Edward Snowden (@Edward Snowden) 1473974322
\u201cThe claim I "doctored performance evaluations?" This one is amazing: I reported an XSS (hacking) vulnerability in CIA annual review system.\u201d— Edward Snowden (@Edward Snowden) 1473974322
\u201cArmy held me for weeks in a special unit for convalescence before separation. I left on crutches. They don't do that for "shin splints."\u201d— Edward Snowden (@Edward Snowden) 1473974322
\u201cThat Russian guy? Speculation presented as fact. NPR accidentally omitted the speaker's "Ya dumayu" (English: "I think") in the translation.\u201d— Edward Snowden (@Edward Snowden) 1473974322
\u201c@Snowden The original audio, which includes the "Ya dumayu," is available at the same link as the source article.\u201d— Edward Snowden (@Edward Snowden) 1473974704
\u201cI could go on. Bottom line: after "two years of investigation," the American people deserve better. This report diminishes the committee.\u201d— Edward Snowden (@Edward Snowden) 1473975117
The U.S. House Intelligence Committee on Thursday released an unclassified summary of its report on National Security Administration (NSA) whistleblower Edward Snowden, who exposed the agency's mass surveillance operations in 2013, in which the committee roundly condemns Snowden as "not a whistleblower" and a "serial fabricator."
"The American people deserve better. This report diminishes the [House Intelligence] committee."
--Edward SnowdenThe three-page summary of the report (pdf), whose publication appeared timed for the nationwide release of Oliver Stone's biopic of Snowden, was widely decried as an orchestrated smear attempt--intended to discredit Snowden just as Stone's sympathetic portrayal of the whistleblower and a growing campaign calling for a presidential pardon both make headlines nationwide.
"By total coincidence, the report they claim was years in the making comes out right as the 'Snowden' movie does," commented Trevor Timm, co-founder and the executive director of the Freedom of the Press Foundation.
"The committee supposed to oversee the NSA is very upset at the movie about the guy who started actual NSA oversight," addedThe Intercept reporter Alex Emmons.
The report appeared to focus on supposed workplace transgressions Snowden committed while working for the NSA, such as cc'ing a higher-level manager on an email thread reporting a critical problem with CIA software, "doctoring performance evaluations" when he was in fact reporting that the evaluation program was susceptible to hacking, and calling in sick when he was leaking the documents detailing the NSA's extensive global wiretapping of private citizens.
Many progressive voices were amused that the charges contained in the report summary were so sparse: "Wait. Is that it? If this three-page report from the House Intelligence Committee on Snowden is all the dirt they have on them, I'm disappointed," wrote ACLU principal technologist Christopher Soghoian on Twitter.
When it was pointed out that the summary was only the unclassified portion of the report, Soghoian responded, "That's true. Perhaps they reveal in the classified report that he left the office at 4:55 a few times and stole paperclips."
The report also suggests Snowden is a foreign agent, referring to him at points as a "guest of the Kremlin" and "traveling to Hong Kong with stolen secrets." In one portion, the report alleges that a Russian official said outright that Snowden shared secrets with the Russian government--which Snowden notes is "speculation presented as fact."
In fact, Snowden slammed every critique contained in the report's summary in a scathing series of Tweets:
\u201cAfter "two years of investigation," the government charges... I faked a sick day and have a GED? Did they not watch the Guardian interview?\u201d— Edward Snowden (@Edward Snowden) 1473974322
\u201c@Snowden Their report is so artlessly distorted that it would be amusing if it weren't such a serious act of bad faith. Let's take examples:\u201d— Edward Snowden (@Edward Snowden) 1473974322
\u201c@Snowden The claim I exfiltrated data for journos 8 months prior to Clapper? False. That was HEARTBEAT (see film), an approved data handler.\u201d— Edward Snowden (@Edward Snowden) 1473974322
\u201c@Snowden HEARTBEAT, which seems to be the source of their 1.5m number, was explicited authorized by two levels of my management. I built it.\u201d— Edward Snowden (@Edward Snowden) 1473974322
\u201c@Snowden The committee seems to intentionally conflate my authorized government work with my unauthorized whistleblowing. Diminishes them.\u201d— Edward Snowden (@Edward Snowden) 1473974322
\u201c@Snowden That NSA's programs were legal and I just didn't understand the nuance? The courts disagree: https://t.co/im7EkRBOBr\u201d— Edward Snowden (@Edward Snowden) 1473974322
\u201c@Snowden Claim: I reported a critical problem (software updates taking field sites offline) to senior management, and was reprimanded. True!\u201d— Edward Snowden (@Edward Snowden) 1473974322
\u201cThe claim I "doctored performance evaluations?" This one is amazing: I reported an XSS (hacking) vulnerability in CIA annual review system.\u201d— Edward Snowden (@Edward Snowden) 1473974322
\u201cArmy held me for weeks in a special unit for convalescence before separation. I left on crutches. They don't do that for "shin splints."\u201d— Edward Snowden (@Edward Snowden) 1473974322
\u201cThat Russian guy? Speculation presented as fact. NPR accidentally omitted the speaker's "Ya dumayu" (English: "I think") in the translation.\u201d— Edward Snowden (@Edward Snowden) 1473974322
\u201c@Snowden The original audio, which includes the "Ya dumayu," is available at the same link as the source article.\u201d— Edward Snowden (@Edward Snowden) 1473974704
\u201cI could go on. Bottom line: after "two years of investigation," the American people deserve better. This report diminishes the committee.\u201d— Edward Snowden (@Edward Snowden) 1473975117
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.