SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Obama Vetoes 9/11-Saudi Legislation Setting Up Potential Override
9/11 families say they are "outraged and dismayed"
Sep 24, 2016
As expected, President Barack Obama has vetoed legislation that would allow families of 9/11 victims to sue nations, including Saudi Arabia, for any role their government may have played in the terrorist attacks.
The move on Friday means Obama will potentially face the first veto override in his presidency.
He wrote in his veto message that the Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act (JASTA) "undermines core U.S. interests," "would neither protect Americans from terrorist attacks nor improve the effectiveness of our response to such attacks," and "threatens [allied nations'] cooperation on key national security issues, including counterterrorism initiatives."
The White House also says, as CNN reports, that it "could expose U.S. diplomats and servicemen to litigation in other countries."
White House press secretary Josh Earnest also previously said, "The whole notion of sovereign immunity is at stake."
The Washington Post writes:"Congressional leaders plan to hold override votes in the coming days and supporters of the legislation say they are confident they can succeed in overturning the president's action."
The 9/11 Families & Survivors United for Justice Against Terrorism issued a statement saying they were "outraged and dismayed" at the veto.
"No matter how much the Saudi lobbying and propaganda machine may argue otherwise, JASTA is a narrowly drawn statute that restores longstanding legal principles that have enjoyed bipartisan support for decades. It will deter terrorism and hold accountable those nations that support and fund it," the statement continued.
The bill easily passed in the U.S. House this month. It passed the Senate in May.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
As expected, President Barack Obama has vetoed legislation that would allow families of 9/11 victims to sue nations, including Saudi Arabia, for any role their government may have played in the terrorist attacks.
The move on Friday means Obama will potentially face the first veto override in his presidency.
He wrote in his veto message that the Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act (JASTA) "undermines core U.S. interests," "would neither protect Americans from terrorist attacks nor improve the effectiveness of our response to such attacks," and "threatens [allied nations'] cooperation on key national security issues, including counterterrorism initiatives."
The White House also says, as CNN reports, that it "could expose U.S. diplomats and servicemen to litigation in other countries."
White House press secretary Josh Earnest also previously said, "The whole notion of sovereign immunity is at stake."
The Washington Post writes:"Congressional leaders plan to hold override votes in the coming days and supporters of the legislation say they are confident they can succeed in overturning the president's action."
The 9/11 Families & Survivors United for Justice Against Terrorism issued a statement saying they were "outraged and dismayed" at the veto.
"No matter how much the Saudi lobbying and propaganda machine may argue otherwise, JASTA is a narrowly drawn statute that restores longstanding legal principles that have enjoyed bipartisan support for decades. It will deter terrorism and hold accountable those nations that support and fund it," the statement continued.
The bill easily passed in the U.S. House this month. It passed the Senate in May.
As expected, President Barack Obama has vetoed legislation that would allow families of 9/11 victims to sue nations, including Saudi Arabia, for any role their government may have played in the terrorist attacks.
The move on Friday means Obama will potentially face the first veto override in his presidency.
He wrote in his veto message that the Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act (JASTA) "undermines core U.S. interests," "would neither protect Americans from terrorist attacks nor improve the effectiveness of our response to such attacks," and "threatens [allied nations'] cooperation on key national security issues, including counterterrorism initiatives."
The White House also says, as CNN reports, that it "could expose U.S. diplomats and servicemen to litigation in other countries."
White House press secretary Josh Earnest also previously said, "The whole notion of sovereign immunity is at stake."
The Washington Post writes:"Congressional leaders plan to hold override votes in the coming days and supporters of the legislation say they are confident they can succeed in overturning the president's action."
The 9/11 Families & Survivors United for Justice Against Terrorism issued a statement saying they were "outraged and dismayed" at the veto.
"No matter how much the Saudi lobbying and propaganda machine may argue otherwise, JASTA is a narrowly drawn statute that restores longstanding legal principles that have enjoyed bipartisan support for decades. It will deter terrorism and hold accountable those nations that support and fund it," the statement continued.
The bill easily passed in the U.S. House this month. It passed the Senate in May.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.