Undermining Democracy, Corporations Pouring Millions into Local Ballot Fights
Public Citizen finds total corporate spending on just eight local measures has topped $139 million
This election cycle, corporate donors are not just beefing up the war chests of their most-favored politicians. According to a new study, industry is flexing its Supreme Court- approved political power to dominate local democracy, as well.
In the study, Big Business Ballot Bullies (pdf),Public Citizen examined eight state-level ballot initiatives and referenda that have seen an outsized amount of political spending. According to the research, published Wednesday, the corporate-backed campaigns have an average of 10-to-1 financial advantage over their mostly grassroots opponents, with total corporate spending in those races topping $139 million.
"These findings should be deeply disturbing to anyone who is concerned about the power of corporate money to distort our democracy," wrote report author and Public Citizen research director Rick Claypool in a Thursday op-ed.
Big Pharma tycoons Pfizer and Johnson & Johnson have spent the most, each contributing more than $7 million to defeat California's Drug Price Standards Initiative, or Proposition 61, which seeks to lower prescription prices in that state. So far, the industry-backed group opposing that measure has raised more than $86 million.
Colorado's Amendment 69, which would install a universal, Medicare-for-All system for state residents, has won the ire of the insurance industry, with Anthem, United Healthcare, and others spending hundreds of thousands to back the opposition.
Also in Colorado, an anti-fracking measure that would have set a mandatory setback for oil and gas development saw millions of opposition spending, including $6.55 million from Anandarko Petroleum Company, before it failed to make November's ballot.
"Corporations spending outrageous sums to defeat ballot initiatives undermine our democracy and cast doubt on the public's ability to make effective use of this long-standing American democratic institution."
--Robert Weissman, Public Citizen
Other high-interest fights include:
- an industry-backed effort to repeal a ban on plastic bags in California (Proposition 67);
- a utility-backed "solar decoy initiative" in Florida (Amendment 1), would make it easier for energy utilities to restrict and raise costs for rooftop solar;
- big business opposition to Oregon's Measure 97, which seeks to increase the minimum corporate tax by establishing a 2.5 percent tax on corporate gross sales that exceed $25 million;
- and in South Dakota, --Georgia-based Select Management Resources--is funding both the campaign against an effort to cap interest rates for payday lenders (Initiated Measure 21) as well as a constitutional amendment (pdf) to restrict such caps.
Beyond the report, there are numerous other local initiatives--such as a pro-charter school measure in Massachusetts and Arizona's marijuana legalization effort--that have also garnered significant industry attention.
"The sheer magnitude of corporate money in these races undermines the power of ballot initiatives and referenda to make policy that prioritizes the public interest over private profits," said Claypool.
And Public Citizen president Robert Weissman added, "Across the country, and for more than a century, people have used initiatives and referenda to drive forward social and economic justice from the ground up. Corporations spending outrageous sums to defeat ballot initiatives undermine our democracy and cast doubt on the public's ability to make effective use of this long-standing American democratic institution."
Claypool points out that it was the Supreme Court's 1978 decision, First National Bank of Boston v Bellotti--not Citizens United--that permitted unlimited corporate spending on ballot initiatives.
"But the solution to Citizens United and Bellotti is the same," he wrote, "a constitutional amendment, such as the Democracy For All Amendment that was supported by a majority of U.S. senators in 2014, can overturn both rulings by asserting the state's authority to limit corporate election spending."
FINAL DAY! This is urgent.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission from the outset was simple. To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It’s never been this bad out there. And it’s never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed and doing some of its best and most important work, the threats we face are intensifying. Right now, with just hours left in our Spring Campaign, we're still falling short of our make-or-break goal. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Can you make a gift right now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? There is no backup plan or rainy day fund. There is only you. —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
This election cycle, corporate donors are not just beefing up the war chests of their most-favored politicians. According to a new study, industry is flexing its Supreme Court- approved political power to dominate local democracy, as well.
In the study, Big Business Ballot Bullies (pdf),Public Citizen examined eight state-level ballot initiatives and referenda that have seen an outsized amount of political spending. According to the research, published Wednesday, the corporate-backed campaigns have an average of 10-to-1 financial advantage over their mostly grassroots opponents, with total corporate spending in those races topping $139 million.
"These findings should be deeply disturbing to anyone who is concerned about the power of corporate money to distort our democracy," wrote report author and Public Citizen research director Rick Claypool in a Thursday op-ed.
Big Pharma tycoons Pfizer and Johnson & Johnson have spent the most, each contributing more than $7 million to defeat California's Drug Price Standards Initiative, or Proposition 61, which seeks to lower prescription prices in that state. So far, the industry-backed group opposing that measure has raised more than $86 million.
Colorado's Amendment 69, which would install a universal, Medicare-for-All system for state residents, has won the ire of the insurance industry, with Anthem, United Healthcare, and others spending hundreds of thousands to back the opposition.
Also in Colorado, an anti-fracking measure that would have set a mandatory setback for oil and gas development saw millions of opposition spending, including $6.55 million from Anandarko Petroleum Company, before it failed to make November's ballot.
"Corporations spending outrageous sums to defeat ballot initiatives undermine our democracy and cast doubt on the public's ability to make effective use of this long-standing American democratic institution."
--Robert Weissman, Public Citizen
Other high-interest fights include:
- an industry-backed effort to repeal a ban on plastic bags in California (Proposition 67);
- a utility-backed "solar decoy initiative" in Florida (Amendment 1), would make it easier for energy utilities to restrict and raise costs for rooftop solar;
- big business opposition to Oregon's Measure 97, which seeks to increase the minimum corporate tax by establishing a 2.5 percent tax on corporate gross sales that exceed $25 million;
- and in South Dakota, --Georgia-based Select Management Resources--is funding both the campaign against an effort to cap interest rates for payday lenders (Initiated Measure 21) as well as a constitutional amendment (pdf) to restrict such caps.
Beyond the report, there are numerous other local initiatives--such as a pro-charter school measure in Massachusetts and Arizona's marijuana legalization effort--that have also garnered significant industry attention.
"The sheer magnitude of corporate money in these races undermines the power of ballot initiatives and referenda to make policy that prioritizes the public interest over private profits," said Claypool.
And Public Citizen president Robert Weissman added, "Across the country, and for more than a century, people have used initiatives and referenda to drive forward social and economic justice from the ground up. Corporations spending outrageous sums to defeat ballot initiatives undermine our democracy and cast doubt on the public's ability to make effective use of this long-standing American democratic institution."
Claypool points out that it was the Supreme Court's 1978 decision, First National Bank of Boston v Bellotti--not Citizens United--that permitted unlimited corporate spending on ballot initiatives.
"But the solution to Citizens United and Bellotti is the same," he wrote, "a constitutional amendment, such as the Democracy For All Amendment that was supported by a majority of U.S. senators in 2014, can overturn both rulings by asserting the state's authority to limit corporate election spending."
This election cycle, corporate donors are not just beefing up the war chests of their most-favored politicians. According to a new study, industry is flexing its Supreme Court- approved political power to dominate local democracy, as well.
In the study, Big Business Ballot Bullies (pdf),Public Citizen examined eight state-level ballot initiatives and referenda that have seen an outsized amount of political spending. According to the research, published Wednesday, the corporate-backed campaigns have an average of 10-to-1 financial advantage over their mostly grassroots opponents, with total corporate spending in those races topping $139 million.
"These findings should be deeply disturbing to anyone who is concerned about the power of corporate money to distort our democracy," wrote report author and Public Citizen research director Rick Claypool in a Thursday op-ed.
Big Pharma tycoons Pfizer and Johnson & Johnson have spent the most, each contributing more than $7 million to defeat California's Drug Price Standards Initiative, or Proposition 61, which seeks to lower prescription prices in that state. So far, the industry-backed group opposing that measure has raised more than $86 million.
Colorado's Amendment 69, which would install a universal, Medicare-for-All system for state residents, has won the ire of the insurance industry, with Anthem, United Healthcare, and others spending hundreds of thousands to back the opposition.
Also in Colorado, an anti-fracking measure that would have set a mandatory setback for oil and gas development saw millions of opposition spending, including $6.55 million from Anandarko Petroleum Company, before it failed to make November's ballot.
"Corporations spending outrageous sums to defeat ballot initiatives undermine our democracy and cast doubt on the public's ability to make effective use of this long-standing American democratic institution."
--Robert Weissman, Public Citizen
Other high-interest fights include:
- an industry-backed effort to repeal a ban on plastic bags in California (Proposition 67);
- a utility-backed "solar decoy initiative" in Florida (Amendment 1), would make it easier for energy utilities to restrict and raise costs for rooftop solar;
- big business opposition to Oregon's Measure 97, which seeks to increase the minimum corporate tax by establishing a 2.5 percent tax on corporate gross sales that exceed $25 million;
- and in South Dakota, --Georgia-based Select Management Resources--is funding both the campaign against an effort to cap interest rates for payday lenders (Initiated Measure 21) as well as a constitutional amendment (pdf) to restrict such caps.
Beyond the report, there are numerous other local initiatives--such as a pro-charter school measure in Massachusetts and Arizona's marijuana legalization effort--that have also garnered significant industry attention.
"The sheer magnitude of corporate money in these races undermines the power of ballot initiatives and referenda to make policy that prioritizes the public interest over private profits," said Claypool.
And Public Citizen president Robert Weissman added, "Across the country, and for more than a century, people have used initiatives and referenda to drive forward social and economic justice from the ground up. Corporations spending outrageous sums to defeat ballot initiatives undermine our democracy and cast doubt on the public's ability to make effective use of this long-standing American democratic institution."
Claypool points out that it was the Supreme Court's 1978 decision, First National Bank of Boston v Bellotti--not Citizens United--that permitted unlimited corporate spending on ballot initiatives.
"But the solution to Citizens United and Bellotti is the same," he wrote, "a constitutional amendment, such as the Democracy For All Amendment that was supported by a majority of U.S. senators in 2014, can overturn both rulings by asserting the state's authority to limit corporate election spending."