SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Electoral College Revolt? Dem Electors Seek to Reject Trump, Dismantle System
"We're trying to be that 'break in case of emergency' fire hose that's gotten dusty over the last 200 years"
Nov 22, 2016
As the right-wing specter of a Donald Trump presidency looms, Democratic electors are fomenting an unprecedented revolt in order to block Trump from taking a majority of Electoral College votes.
Politico reports that "at least a half-dozen Democratic electors" have agreed to the effort, which they also hope will serve to "undermine the legitimacy of the institution":
The presidential electors, mostly former Bernie Sanders supporters who hail from Washington state and Colorado, are now lobbying their Republican counterparts in other states to reject their oaths--and in some cases, state law--to vote against Trump[...]
Even the most optimistic among the Democratic electors acknowledges they're unlikely to persuade the necessary 37 Republican electors to reject Trump--the number they'd likely need to deny him the presidency and send the final decision to the House of Representatives. And even if they do, the Republican-run House might simply elect Trump anyway.
But the Democratic electors are convinced that even in defeat, their efforts would erode confidence in the Electoral College and fuel efforts to eliminate it, ending the body's 228-year run as the only official constitutional process for electing the president. With that goal in mind, the group is also contemplating encouraging Democratic electors to oppose Hillary Clinton and partner with Republicans in support of a consensus pick like Mitt Romney or John Kasich.
The two electors leading the effort, Michael Baca and Bret Chiafalo (from Colorado and Washington state, respectively), refer to themselves as the Hamilton Electors. Founding father and first Treasury Secretary Alexander Hamilton wrote that the Electoral College exists so that "the office of President will never fall to the lot of any man who is not in an eminent degree endowed with the requisite qualifications."
"We're trying to be that 'break in case of emergency' fire hose that's gotten dusty over the last 200 years," Chaifolo told the Atlantic. "This is an emergency."
Chiafalo and Baca write on their site that "we hope that Electors from both red and blue states will answer the Founding Fathers' call, deliberate, and unite behind an alternative Republican Candidate: the Hamilton Candidate."
It is unclear how many electors plan to be "faithless," meaning they'll refuse to vote for their party's candidate, notes Politico. The outlet adds: "Already, the six Democrats prepared to be 'faithless' electors would be the most to defect from their party's presidential candidate since 1872, when Democratic nominee Horace Greeley died before electors cast their votes. The last time that many electors rejected a living presidential candidate was 1808."
The electors will cast their votes for president on December 19.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
As the right-wing specter of a Donald Trump presidency looms, Democratic electors are fomenting an unprecedented revolt in order to block Trump from taking a majority of Electoral College votes.
Politico reports that "at least a half-dozen Democratic electors" have agreed to the effort, which they also hope will serve to "undermine the legitimacy of the institution":
The presidential electors, mostly former Bernie Sanders supporters who hail from Washington state and Colorado, are now lobbying their Republican counterparts in other states to reject their oaths--and in some cases, state law--to vote against Trump[...]
Even the most optimistic among the Democratic electors acknowledges they're unlikely to persuade the necessary 37 Republican electors to reject Trump--the number they'd likely need to deny him the presidency and send the final decision to the House of Representatives. And even if they do, the Republican-run House might simply elect Trump anyway.
But the Democratic electors are convinced that even in defeat, their efforts would erode confidence in the Electoral College and fuel efforts to eliminate it, ending the body's 228-year run as the only official constitutional process for electing the president. With that goal in mind, the group is also contemplating encouraging Democratic electors to oppose Hillary Clinton and partner with Republicans in support of a consensus pick like Mitt Romney or John Kasich.
The two electors leading the effort, Michael Baca and Bret Chiafalo (from Colorado and Washington state, respectively), refer to themselves as the Hamilton Electors. Founding father and first Treasury Secretary Alexander Hamilton wrote that the Electoral College exists so that "the office of President will never fall to the lot of any man who is not in an eminent degree endowed with the requisite qualifications."
"We're trying to be that 'break in case of emergency' fire hose that's gotten dusty over the last 200 years," Chaifolo told the Atlantic. "This is an emergency."
Chiafalo and Baca write on their site that "we hope that Electors from both red and blue states will answer the Founding Fathers' call, deliberate, and unite behind an alternative Republican Candidate: the Hamilton Candidate."
It is unclear how many electors plan to be "faithless," meaning they'll refuse to vote for their party's candidate, notes Politico. The outlet adds: "Already, the six Democrats prepared to be 'faithless' electors would be the most to defect from their party's presidential candidate since 1872, when Democratic nominee Horace Greeley died before electors cast their votes. The last time that many electors rejected a living presidential candidate was 1808."
The electors will cast their votes for president on December 19.
As the right-wing specter of a Donald Trump presidency looms, Democratic electors are fomenting an unprecedented revolt in order to block Trump from taking a majority of Electoral College votes.
Politico reports that "at least a half-dozen Democratic electors" have agreed to the effort, which they also hope will serve to "undermine the legitimacy of the institution":
The presidential electors, mostly former Bernie Sanders supporters who hail from Washington state and Colorado, are now lobbying their Republican counterparts in other states to reject their oaths--and in some cases, state law--to vote against Trump[...]
Even the most optimistic among the Democratic electors acknowledges they're unlikely to persuade the necessary 37 Republican electors to reject Trump--the number they'd likely need to deny him the presidency and send the final decision to the House of Representatives. And even if they do, the Republican-run House might simply elect Trump anyway.
But the Democratic electors are convinced that even in defeat, their efforts would erode confidence in the Electoral College and fuel efforts to eliminate it, ending the body's 228-year run as the only official constitutional process for electing the president. With that goal in mind, the group is also contemplating encouraging Democratic electors to oppose Hillary Clinton and partner with Republicans in support of a consensus pick like Mitt Romney or John Kasich.
The two electors leading the effort, Michael Baca and Bret Chiafalo (from Colorado and Washington state, respectively), refer to themselves as the Hamilton Electors. Founding father and first Treasury Secretary Alexander Hamilton wrote that the Electoral College exists so that "the office of President will never fall to the lot of any man who is not in an eminent degree endowed with the requisite qualifications."
"We're trying to be that 'break in case of emergency' fire hose that's gotten dusty over the last 200 years," Chaifolo told the Atlantic. "This is an emergency."
Chiafalo and Baca write on their site that "we hope that Electors from both red and blue states will answer the Founding Fathers' call, deliberate, and unite behind an alternative Republican Candidate: the Hamilton Candidate."
It is unclear how many electors plan to be "faithless," meaning they'll refuse to vote for their party's candidate, notes Politico. The outlet adds: "Already, the six Democrats prepared to be 'faithless' electors would be the most to defect from their party's presidential candidate since 1872, when Democratic nominee Horace Greeley died before electors cast their votes. The last time that many electors rejected a living presidential candidate was 1808."
The electors will cast their votes for president on December 19.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.