Don't Let Politics Trump Science, 2000 Scientists Warn President-Elect
Scientist says the community is "looking at the kinds of people that Trump is appointing, and we have no good reason to be optimistic"
Signaling great pessimism about the future "role of science in policymaking," more than 2,000 scientists published an open letter to President-elect Donald Trump and the GOP-dominated 115th Congress on Wednesday warning against the dangers of allowing "political or corporate influence" to override scientific fact.
"From disease outbreaks to climate change to national security to technology innovation, people benefit when our nation's policies are informed by science unfettered by inappropriate political or corporate influence," stated the letter (pdf), organized by theUnion of Concerned Scientists (UCS) and signed by 2,300 scientists, including 22 Nobel Prize winners.
Many of Trump's advisors and potential cabinet nominees have not made their skepticism over climate change, women's reproductive health, and other scientific matters a secret. Without naming names, the letter goes on to state that, "Federal agencies should be led by officials with demonstrated track records of respecting science as a critical component of decision making."
The scientists also made clear the importance of existing, scientifically-valid public health and environmental regulations, many of which Trump has vowed to slash upon taking office.
Congress and Trump, they said, must "ensure our nation's bedrock public health and environmental laws--such as the Clean Air Act and the Endangered Species Act--retain a strong scientific foundation, and that agencies are able to freely collect and draw upon scientific data to effectively carry out statutory responsibilities established by these laws."
Further, they explained the importance of adhering to "high standards of scientific integrity and independence in responding to current and emerging public health and environmental threats."
"Decision makers and the public need to know what the best-available scientific evidence is, not what vested interests might wish it to be," the scientists continued. "Federally funded scientists must be able to develop and share their findings free from censorship or manipulation based on politics or ideology" and "without fear of reprisal or retaliation," they wrote.
As the Washington Post noted, the letter "echoes a previous one" also released by the UCS "that was directed at Bush in 2004," after his office had already seen "multiple science-related scandals."
Alternately, Wednesday's letter is seen as a pre-emptive move, given the signals being sent from the Trump camp.
"Twelve years ago, the Republican president was...very crude in the way they dealt with science," signatory Lewis Branscomb, a physicist at the University of California at San Diego, told the Post. "They very often had political people in the government rewriting reports that scientists in the government had written. That sort of thing happened."
"And now," Branscomb added, "we're looking at the kinds of people that Trump is appointing, and we have no good reason to be optimistic about what they're going to do."
The distinguished signatories hail from all 50 states and include "medical scientists, physicists, and many climate researchers," the Post notes.
We are at a crossroads
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. In a few short weeks, US voters will have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. Our Fall Campaign is underway, and we need your help. To power our newsroom through the rest of the year, we need to raise $125,000 by midnight on October 31. So if you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
Signaling great pessimism about the future "role of science in policymaking," more than 2,000 scientists published an open letter to President-elect Donald Trump and the GOP-dominated 115th Congress on Wednesday warning against the dangers of allowing "political or corporate influence" to override scientific fact.
"From disease outbreaks to climate change to national security to technology innovation, people benefit when our nation's policies are informed by science unfettered by inappropriate political or corporate influence," stated the letter (pdf), organized by theUnion of Concerned Scientists (UCS) and signed by 2,300 scientists, including 22 Nobel Prize winners.
Many of Trump's advisors and potential cabinet nominees have not made their skepticism over climate change, women's reproductive health, and other scientific matters a secret. Without naming names, the letter goes on to state that, "Federal agencies should be led by officials with demonstrated track records of respecting science as a critical component of decision making."
The scientists also made clear the importance of existing, scientifically-valid public health and environmental regulations, many of which Trump has vowed to slash upon taking office.
Congress and Trump, they said, must "ensure our nation's bedrock public health and environmental laws--such as the Clean Air Act and the Endangered Species Act--retain a strong scientific foundation, and that agencies are able to freely collect and draw upon scientific data to effectively carry out statutory responsibilities established by these laws."
Further, they explained the importance of adhering to "high standards of scientific integrity and independence in responding to current and emerging public health and environmental threats."
"Decision makers and the public need to know what the best-available scientific evidence is, not what vested interests might wish it to be," the scientists continued. "Federally funded scientists must be able to develop and share their findings free from censorship or manipulation based on politics or ideology" and "without fear of reprisal or retaliation," they wrote.
As the Washington Post noted, the letter "echoes a previous one" also released by the UCS "that was directed at Bush in 2004," after his office had already seen "multiple science-related scandals."
Alternately, Wednesday's letter is seen as a pre-emptive move, given the signals being sent from the Trump camp.
"Twelve years ago, the Republican president was...very crude in the way they dealt with science," signatory Lewis Branscomb, a physicist at the University of California at San Diego, told the Post. "They very often had political people in the government rewriting reports that scientists in the government had written. That sort of thing happened."
"And now," Branscomb added, "we're looking at the kinds of people that Trump is appointing, and we have no good reason to be optimistic about what they're going to do."
The distinguished signatories hail from all 50 states and include "medical scientists, physicists, and many climate researchers," the Post notes.
Signaling great pessimism about the future "role of science in policymaking," more than 2,000 scientists published an open letter to President-elect Donald Trump and the GOP-dominated 115th Congress on Wednesday warning against the dangers of allowing "political or corporate influence" to override scientific fact.
"From disease outbreaks to climate change to national security to technology innovation, people benefit when our nation's policies are informed by science unfettered by inappropriate political or corporate influence," stated the letter (pdf), organized by theUnion of Concerned Scientists (UCS) and signed by 2,300 scientists, including 22 Nobel Prize winners.
Many of Trump's advisors and potential cabinet nominees have not made their skepticism over climate change, women's reproductive health, and other scientific matters a secret. Without naming names, the letter goes on to state that, "Federal agencies should be led by officials with demonstrated track records of respecting science as a critical component of decision making."
The scientists also made clear the importance of existing, scientifically-valid public health and environmental regulations, many of which Trump has vowed to slash upon taking office.
Congress and Trump, they said, must "ensure our nation's bedrock public health and environmental laws--such as the Clean Air Act and the Endangered Species Act--retain a strong scientific foundation, and that agencies are able to freely collect and draw upon scientific data to effectively carry out statutory responsibilities established by these laws."
Further, they explained the importance of adhering to "high standards of scientific integrity and independence in responding to current and emerging public health and environmental threats."
"Decision makers and the public need to know what the best-available scientific evidence is, not what vested interests might wish it to be," the scientists continued. "Federally funded scientists must be able to develop and share their findings free from censorship or manipulation based on politics or ideology" and "without fear of reprisal or retaliation," they wrote.
As the Washington Post noted, the letter "echoes a previous one" also released by the UCS "that was directed at Bush in 2004," after his office had already seen "multiple science-related scandals."
Alternately, Wednesday's letter is seen as a pre-emptive move, given the signals being sent from the Trump camp.
"Twelve years ago, the Republican president was...very crude in the way they dealt with science," signatory Lewis Branscomb, a physicist at the University of California at San Diego, told the Post. "They very often had political people in the government rewriting reports that scientists in the government had written. That sort of thing happened."
"And now," Branscomb added, "we're looking at the kinds of people that Trump is appointing, and we have no good reason to be optimistic about what they're going to do."
The distinguished signatories hail from all 50 states and include "medical scientists, physicists, and many climate researchers," the Post notes.