SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Don't Let Politics Trump Science, 2000 Scientists Warn President-Elect
Scientist says the community is "looking at the kinds of people that Trump is appointing, and we have no good reason to be optimistic"
Nov 30, 2016
Signaling great pessimism about the future "role of science in policymaking," more than 2,000 scientists published an open letter to President-elect Donald Trump and the GOP-dominated 115th Congress on Wednesday warning against the dangers of allowing "political or corporate influence" to override scientific fact.
"From disease outbreaks to climate change to national security to technology innovation, people benefit when our nation's policies are informed by science unfettered by inappropriate political or corporate influence," stated the letter (pdf), organized by theUnion of Concerned Scientists (UCS) and signed by 2,300 scientists, including 22 Nobel Prize winners.
Many of Trump's advisors and potential cabinet nominees have not made their skepticism over climate change, women's reproductive health, and other scientific matters a secret. Without naming names, the letter goes on to state that, "Federal agencies should be led by officials with demonstrated track records of respecting science as a critical component of decision making."
The scientists also made clear the importance of existing, scientifically-valid public health and environmental regulations, many of which Trump has vowed to slash upon taking office.
Congress and Trump, they said, must "ensure our nation's bedrock public health and environmental laws--such as the Clean Air Act and the Endangered Species Act--retain a strong scientific foundation, and that agencies are able to freely collect and draw upon scientific data to effectively carry out statutory responsibilities established by these laws."
Further, they explained the importance of adhering to "high standards of scientific integrity and independence in responding to current and emerging public health and environmental threats."
"Decision makers and the public need to know what the best-available scientific evidence is, not what vested interests might wish it to be," the scientists continued. "Federally funded scientists must be able to develop and share their findings free from censorship or manipulation based on politics or ideology" and "without fear of reprisal or retaliation," they wrote.
As the Washington Post noted, the letter "echoes a previous one" also released by the UCS "that was directed at Bush in 2004," after his office had already seen "multiple science-related scandals."
Alternately, Wednesday's letter is seen as a pre-emptive move, given the signals being sent from the Trump camp.
"Twelve years ago, the Republican president was...very crude in the way they dealt with science," signatory Lewis Branscomb, a physicist at the University of California at San Diego, told the Post. "They very often had political people in the government rewriting reports that scientists in the government had written. That sort of thing happened."
"And now," Branscomb added, "we're looking at the kinds of people that Trump is appointing, and we have no good reason to be optimistic about what they're going to do."
The distinguished signatories hail from all 50 states and include "medical scientists, physicists, and many climate researchers," the Post notes.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Lauren McCauley
Lauren McCauley is a former senior editor for Common Dreams covering national and international politics and progressive news. She is now the Editor of Maine Morning Star. Lauren also helped produce a number of documentary films, including the award-winning Soundtrack for a Revolution and The Hollywood Complex, as well as one currently in production about civil rights icon James Meredith. Her writing has been featured on Newsweek, BillMoyers.com, TruthDig, Truthout, In These Times, and Extra! the newsletter of Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting. She currently lives in Kennebunk, Maine with her husband, two children, a dog, and several chickens.
Signaling great pessimism about the future "role of science in policymaking," more than 2,000 scientists published an open letter to President-elect Donald Trump and the GOP-dominated 115th Congress on Wednesday warning against the dangers of allowing "political or corporate influence" to override scientific fact.
"From disease outbreaks to climate change to national security to technology innovation, people benefit when our nation's policies are informed by science unfettered by inappropriate political or corporate influence," stated the letter (pdf), organized by theUnion of Concerned Scientists (UCS) and signed by 2,300 scientists, including 22 Nobel Prize winners.
Many of Trump's advisors and potential cabinet nominees have not made their skepticism over climate change, women's reproductive health, and other scientific matters a secret. Without naming names, the letter goes on to state that, "Federal agencies should be led by officials with demonstrated track records of respecting science as a critical component of decision making."
The scientists also made clear the importance of existing, scientifically-valid public health and environmental regulations, many of which Trump has vowed to slash upon taking office.
Congress and Trump, they said, must "ensure our nation's bedrock public health and environmental laws--such as the Clean Air Act and the Endangered Species Act--retain a strong scientific foundation, and that agencies are able to freely collect and draw upon scientific data to effectively carry out statutory responsibilities established by these laws."
Further, they explained the importance of adhering to "high standards of scientific integrity and independence in responding to current and emerging public health and environmental threats."
"Decision makers and the public need to know what the best-available scientific evidence is, not what vested interests might wish it to be," the scientists continued. "Federally funded scientists must be able to develop and share their findings free from censorship or manipulation based on politics or ideology" and "without fear of reprisal or retaliation," they wrote.
As the Washington Post noted, the letter "echoes a previous one" also released by the UCS "that was directed at Bush in 2004," after his office had already seen "multiple science-related scandals."
Alternately, Wednesday's letter is seen as a pre-emptive move, given the signals being sent from the Trump camp.
"Twelve years ago, the Republican president was...very crude in the way they dealt with science," signatory Lewis Branscomb, a physicist at the University of California at San Diego, told the Post. "They very often had political people in the government rewriting reports that scientists in the government had written. That sort of thing happened."
"And now," Branscomb added, "we're looking at the kinds of people that Trump is appointing, and we have no good reason to be optimistic about what they're going to do."
The distinguished signatories hail from all 50 states and include "medical scientists, physicists, and many climate researchers," the Post notes.
Lauren McCauley
Lauren McCauley is a former senior editor for Common Dreams covering national and international politics and progressive news. She is now the Editor of Maine Morning Star. Lauren also helped produce a number of documentary films, including the award-winning Soundtrack for a Revolution and The Hollywood Complex, as well as one currently in production about civil rights icon James Meredith. Her writing has been featured on Newsweek, BillMoyers.com, TruthDig, Truthout, In These Times, and Extra! the newsletter of Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting. She currently lives in Kennebunk, Maine with her husband, two children, a dog, and several chickens.
Signaling great pessimism about the future "role of science in policymaking," more than 2,000 scientists published an open letter to President-elect Donald Trump and the GOP-dominated 115th Congress on Wednesday warning against the dangers of allowing "political or corporate influence" to override scientific fact.
"From disease outbreaks to climate change to national security to technology innovation, people benefit when our nation's policies are informed by science unfettered by inappropriate political or corporate influence," stated the letter (pdf), organized by theUnion of Concerned Scientists (UCS) and signed by 2,300 scientists, including 22 Nobel Prize winners.
Many of Trump's advisors and potential cabinet nominees have not made their skepticism over climate change, women's reproductive health, and other scientific matters a secret. Without naming names, the letter goes on to state that, "Federal agencies should be led by officials with demonstrated track records of respecting science as a critical component of decision making."
The scientists also made clear the importance of existing, scientifically-valid public health and environmental regulations, many of which Trump has vowed to slash upon taking office.
Congress and Trump, they said, must "ensure our nation's bedrock public health and environmental laws--such as the Clean Air Act and the Endangered Species Act--retain a strong scientific foundation, and that agencies are able to freely collect and draw upon scientific data to effectively carry out statutory responsibilities established by these laws."
Further, they explained the importance of adhering to "high standards of scientific integrity and independence in responding to current and emerging public health and environmental threats."
"Decision makers and the public need to know what the best-available scientific evidence is, not what vested interests might wish it to be," the scientists continued. "Federally funded scientists must be able to develop and share their findings free from censorship or manipulation based on politics or ideology" and "without fear of reprisal or retaliation," they wrote.
As the Washington Post noted, the letter "echoes a previous one" also released by the UCS "that was directed at Bush in 2004," after his office had already seen "multiple science-related scandals."
Alternately, Wednesday's letter is seen as a pre-emptive move, given the signals being sent from the Trump camp.
"Twelve years ago, the Republican president was...very crude in the way they dealt with science," signatory Lewis Branscomb, a physicist at the University of California at San Diego, told the Post. "They very often had political people in the government rewriting reports that scientists in the government had written. That sort of thing happened."
"And now," Branscomb added, "we're looking at the kinds of people that Trump is appointing, and we have no good reason to be optimistic about what they're going to do."
The distinguished signatories hail from all 50 states and include "medical scientists, physicists, and many climate researchers," the Post notes.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.