

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
British Prime Minister Theresa May will campaign to withdraw the United Kingdom from the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) in 2020, according to new reports.
May is expected to make the withdrawal a central mandate of her campaign to be formally voted into office in 2020. She became the unelected leader of the U.K. after former Prime Minister David Cameron stepped down in July following the Brexit referendum.
The new conservative government is also separately seeking to replace its current Human Rights Act--the U.K.'s implementation of the ECHR--with a new set of rules which critics say actually cracks down on free speech and peaceful protest.
While the convention is presided over by the European Court of Human Rights, May's proposed bill of rights would not be beholden to an outside judiciary.
As the Independent explains, May "is looking to break off all relations with the court."
"We urge the prime minister to spend her time trying to protect our rights, not do away with them," the British organization Liberty Human Rights said in response to reports on May's plans.
The group's director, Martha Spurrier, tweeted that the plans were "deeply irresponsible [and] frighteningly unprincipled," and put the prime minister on the wrong side of history.
Critics also warned that leaving the ECHR could be disastrous for the peace process in Northern Ireland, saying a withdrawal was akin to "playing with fire."
May initially floated the proposal while still serving as home secretary. At the time, shadow justice secretary Charles Falconer called the plans "so ignorant, so illiberal, so misguided...there has to be a source external to a government determining what human rights are."
"It will so damage the standing of the U.K., a country that above all plays by the rules and that is going around the world saying we should comply as a world with human rights," Falconer said in April. "This is so, so appalling."
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
British Prime Minister Theresa May will campaign to withdraw the United Kingdom from the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) in 2020, according to new reports.
May is expected to make the withdrawal a central mandate of her campaign to be formally voted into office in 2020. She became the unelected leader of the U.K. after former Prime Minister David Cameron stepped down in July following the Brexit referendum.
The new conservative government is also separately seeking to replace its current Human Rights Act--the U.K.'s implementation of the ECHR--with a new set of rules which critics say actually cracks down on free speech and peaceful protest.
While the convention is presided over by the European Court of Human Rights, May's proposed bill of rights would not be beholden to an outside judiciary.
As the Independent explains, May "is looking to break off all relations with the court."
"We urge the prime minister to spend her time trying to protect our rights, not do away with them," the British organization Liberty Human Rights said in response to reports on May's plans.
The group's director, Martha Spurrier, tweeted that the plans were "deeply irresponsible [and] frighteningly unprincipled," and put the prime minister on the wrong side of history.
Critics also warned that leaving the ECHR could be disastrous for the peace process in Northern Ireland, saying a withdrawal was akin to "playing with fire."
May initially floated the proposal while still serving as home secretary. At the time, shadow justice secretary Charles Falconer called the plans "so ignorant, so illiberal, so misguided...there has to be a source external to a government determining what human rights are."
"It will so damage the standing of the U.K., a country that above all plays by the rules and that is going around the world saying we should comply as a world with human rights," Falconer said in April. "This is so, so appalling."
British Prime Minister Theresa May will campaign to withdraw the United Kingdom from the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) in 2020, according to new reports.
May is expected to make the withdrawal a central mandate of her campaign to be formally voted into office in 2020. She became the unelected leader of the U.K. after former Prime Minister David Cameron stepped down in July following the Brexit referendum.
The new conservative government is also separately seeking to replace its current Human Rights Act--the U.K.'s implementation of the ECHR--with a new set of rules which critics say actually cracks down on free speech and peaceful protest.
While the convention is presided over by the European Court of Human Rights, May's proposed bill of rights would not be beholden to an outside judiciary.
As the Independent explains, May "is looking to break off all relations with the court."
"We urge the prime minister to spend her time trying to protect our rights, not do away with them," the British organization Liberty Human Rights said in response to reports on May's plans.
The group's director, Martha Spurrier, tweeted that the plans were "deeply irresponsible [and] frighteningly unprincipled," and put the prime minister on the wrong side of history.
Critics also warned that leaving the ECHR could be disastrous for the peace process in Northern Ireland, saying a withdrawal was akin to "playing with fire."
May initially floated the proposal while still serving as home secretary. At the time, shadow justice secretary Charles Falconer called the plans "so ignorant, so illiberal, so misguided...there has to be a source external to a government determining what human rights are."
"It will so damage the standing of the U.K., a country that above all plays by the rules and that is going around the world saying we should comply as a world with human rights," Falconer said in April. "This is so, so appalling."