

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Top Senate Democrats along with public health advocates are calling for an investigation into medical stock trading by Rep. Tom Price (R-Ga.), President-elect Donald Trump's choice to lead the Department of Health and Human Services.
The Wall Street Journal reported late last month that Price "traded more than $300,000 in shares of health-related companies over the past four years while sponsoring and advocating legislation that potentially could affect those companies' stocks."
Price reportedly bought and sold stock in about 40 healthcare and pharmaceutical companies including Eli Lilly & Co., Pfizer Inc., and Aetna Inc., while sponsoring nine and co-sponsoring 35 health-related bills in the House.
For example, the Journal wrote:
Mr. Price has made dozens of trades since 2012. On March 17, 2016, he made 70 trades, adding, among other things, to his holdings of Aetna by as much as $15,000, disclosure reports say.
As he has bought Aetna stock, Mr. Price has championed his own legislation to replace the Obama administration's Affordable Care Act.
The Empowering Patients First Act would provide refundable credits for people to buy insurance if they don't have access to employer or government plans. Such credits could be used to purchase Aetna and others' insurance. On the other hand, Aetna and others are set to benefit from certain provisions of the 2010 health law that Mr. Price's bill would replace.
Now, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.), along with Sens. Patty Murray (D-Wash.) and Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) are calling for an investigation by the Office of Congressional Ethics before Price's confirmation hearings begin.
"Congressman Price had the influence and was actively involved in pushing healthcare policies while simultaneously making dozens of trades in companies that would be impacted by those policies," Schumer told reporters on Thursday. "We don't know if he broke the law. But there is certainly enough serious questions to warrant a serious investigation."
Murray echoed that argument in a series of tweets:
The Democrats' call came on the heels of a letter (pdf) from Public Citizen that makes a similar demand. The advocacy group asks the Office of Congressional Ethics and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission to investigate Price as well as Rep. Chris Collins (R-N.Y.) "for conflicts of interest and possible insider trading."
"Both members of Congress sit on congressional committees with direct oversight of the pharmaceutical and health industries, are key sponsors of legislation affecting the health care industry, and are very actively trading on pharmaceutical and health care stocks that have reaped substantial profits on the stock market," the letter reads.
Price was chair of the U.S. House of Representatives Budget Committee and a member of the House Ways and Means Subcommittee on Health; he has made at least 630 trades on the stock market, many of them involving the pharmaceutical and healthcare sectors, since 2009. Collins is a member of the House Energy and Commerce Subcommittee on Health and a board member and the largest shareholder of a major biotech company, Australia's Innate Immunotherapeutics Limited--which Public Citizen points out is "a company in which both Price and Collins made major stock purchases within days of each other, according to financial disclosure reports." Those buys came just a few months before both lawmakers voted yes on the 21st Century Cures Act, which authorizes billions in spending on medical research, including $500 million for the FDA to speed up drug approvals.
"Extensive stock trading activity in industries that Price and Collins oversee as congressmen, and unusually good timing and financial benefits of those stock trades, raise red flags about the potential use of insider information," said Craig Holman, government affairs lobbyist for Public Citizen's Congress Watch division. "The public information available falls short of hard evidence of insider trading, but the patterns of trading activity certainly warrant further investigation to determine if it occurred."
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Top Senate Democrats along with public health advocates are calling for an investigation into medical stock trading by Rep. Tom Price (R-Ga.), President-elect Donald Trump's choice to lead the Department of Health and Human Services.
The Wall Street Journal reported late last month that Price "traded more than $300,000 in shares of health-related companies over the past four years while sponsoring and advocating legislation that potentially could affect those companies' stocks."
Price reportedly bought and sold stock in about 40 healthcare and pharmaceutical companies including Eli Lilly & Co., Pfizer Inc., and Aetna Inc., while sponsoring nine and co-sponsoring 35 health-related bills in the House.
For example, the Journal wrote:
Mr. Price has made dozens of trades since 2012. On March 17, 2016, he made 70 trades, adding, among other things, to his holdings of Aetna by as much as $15,000, disclosure reports say.
As he has bought Aetna stock, Mr. Price has championed his own legislation to replace the Obama administration's Affordable Care Act.
The Empowering Patients First Act would provide refundable credits for people to buy insurance if they don't have access to employer or government plans. Such credits could be used to purchase Aetna and others' insurance. On the other hand, Aetna and others are set to benefit from certain provisions of the 2010 health law that Mr. Price's bill would replace.
Now, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.), along with Sens. Patty Murray (D-Wash.) and Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) are calling for an investigation by the Office of Congressional Ethics before Price's confirmation hearings begin.
"Congressman Price had the influence and was actively involved in pushing healthcare policies while simultaneously making dozens of trades in companies that would be impacted by those policies," Schumer told reporters on Thursday. "We don't know if he broke the law. But there is certainly enough serious questions to warrant a serious investigation."
Murray echoed that argument in a series of tweets:
The Democrats' call came on the heels of a letter (pdf) from Public Citizen that makes a similar demand. The advocacy group asks the Office of Congressional Ethics and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission to investigate Price as well as Rep. Chris Collins (R-N.Y.) "for conflicts of interest and possible insider trading."
"Both members of Congress sit on congressional committees with direct oversight of the pharmaceutical and health industries, are key sponsors of legislation affecting the health care industry, and are very actively trading on pharmaceutical and health care stocks that have reaped substantial profits on the stock market," the letter reads.
Price was chair of the U.S. House of Representatives Budget Committee and a member of the House Ways and Means Subcommittee on Health; he has made at least 630 trades on the stock market, many of them involving the pharmaceutical and healthcare sectors, since 2009. Collins is a member of the House Energy and Commerce Subcommittee on Health and a board member and the largest shareholder of a major biotech company, Australia's Innate Immunotherapeutics Limited--which Public Citizen points out is "a company in which both Price and Collins made major stock purchases within days of each other, according to financial disclosure reports." Those buys came just a few months before both lawmakers voted yes on the 21st Century Cures Act, which authorizes billions in spending on medical research, including $500 million for the FDA to speed up drug approvals.
"Extensive stock trading activity in industries that Price and Collins oversee as congressmen, and unusually good timing and financial benefits of those stock trades, raise red flags about the potential use of insider information," said Craig Holman, government affairs lobbyist for Public Citizen's Congress Watch division. "The public information available falls short of hard evidence of insider trading, but the patterns of trading activity certainly warrant further investigation to determine if it occurred."
Top Senate Democrats along with public health advocates are calling for an investigation into medical stock trading by Rep. Tom Price (R-Ga.), President-elect Donald Trump's choice to lead the Department of Health and Human Services.
The Wall Street Journal reported late last month that Price "traded more than $300,000 in shares of health-related companies over the past four years while sponsoring and advocating legislation that potentially could affect those companies' stocks."
Price reportedly bought and sold stock in about 40 healthcare and pharmaceutical companies including Eli Lilly & Co., Pfizer Inc., and Aetna Inc., while sponsoring nine and co-sponsoring 35 health-related bills in the House.
For example, the Journal wrote:
Mr. Price has made dozens of trades since 2012. On March 17, 2016, he made 70 trades, adding, among other things, to his holdings of Aetna by as much as $15,000, disclosure reports say.
As he has bought Aetna stock, Mr. Price has championed his own legislation to replace the Obama administration's Affordable Care Act.
The Empowering Patients First Act would provide refundable credits for people to buy insurance if they don't have access to employer or government plans. Such credits could be used to purchase Aetna and others' insurance. On the other hand, Aetna and others are set to benefit from certain provisions of the 2010 health law that Mr. Price's bill would replace.
Now, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.), along with Sens. Patty Murray (D-Wash.) and Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) are calling for an investigation by the Office of Congressional Ethics before Price's confirmation hearings begin.
"Congressman Price had the influence and was actively involved in pushing healthcare policies while simultaneously making dozens of trades in companies that would be impacted by those policies," Schumer told reporters on Thursday. "We don't know if he broke the law. But there is certainly enough serious questions to warrant a serious investigation."
Murray echoed that argument in a series of tweets:
The Democrats' call came on the heels of a letter (pdf) from Public Citizen that makes a similar demand. The advocacy group asks the Office of Congressional Ethics and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission to investigate Price as well as Rep. Chris Collins (R-N.Y.) "for conflicts of interest and possible insider trading."
"Both members of Congress sit on congressional committees with direct oversight of the pharmaceutical and health industries, are key sponsors of legislation affecting the health care industry, and are very actively trading on pharmaceutical and health care stocks that have reaped substantial profits on the stock market," the letter reads.
Price was chair of the U.S. House of Representatives Budget Committee and a member of the House Ways and Means Subcommittee on Health; he has made at least 630 trades on the stock market, many of them involving the pharmaceutical and healthcare sectors, since 2009. Collins is a member of the House Energy and Commerce Subcommittee on Health and a board member and the largest shareholder of a major biotech company, Australia's Innate Immunotherapeutics Limited--which Public Citizen points out is "a company in which both Price and Collins made major stock purchases within days of each other, according to financial disclosure reports." Those buys came just a few months before both lawmakers voted yes on the 21st Century Cures Act, which authorizes billions in spending on medical research, including $500 million for the FDA to speed up drug approvals.
"Extensive stock trading activity in industries that Price and Collins oversee as congressmen, and unusually good timing and financial benefits of those stock trades, raise red flags about the potential use of insider information," said Craig Holman, government affairs lobbyist for Public Citizen's Congress Watch division. "The public information available falls short of hard evidence of insider trading, but the patterns of trading activity certainly warrant further investigation to determine if it occurred."