SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
GOP Leader Threatens to Subpoena Ethics Chief Who Called Out Trump Conflicts
Rep. Jason Chaffetz, the Republican leader of the House Oversight Committee, issued a not so veiled threat against the head of the Office of Government Ethics
Jan 13, 2017
Instead of investigating concerns that President-elect Donald Trump will come to power with numerous conflicts of interest, the Republican head of the House Oversight Committee is now threatening the government ethics monitor who called them out.
Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah) sent a letter (pdf) to Walter Shaub, head of the Office of Government Ethics (OGE), admonishing him for "blurring the lines between public relations and official ethics guidance," citing a series of OGE tweets encouraging President-elect to commit to "full divestiture" of his business holdings (which he has refused to do.)
In the letter, Chaffetz warns Shaub that the OGE's operations are being examined by the committee and then demands that he make himself available "for a transcribed interview with the Committee staff as soon as possible, but not later than January 31, 2017."
What's more, in an interview with Politico, Chaffetz said he would go so far as to subpoena Shaub "if we have to."
Notably, the letter was issued one day after Shaub publicly denounced the president-elect for his ethics failures, particularly Trump's plan to hand his business empire over to his sons--an arrangement Shaub described as "meaningless."
Shaub also in recent days has expressed "great concern" that a number of Trump's cabinet nominees had not submitted financial disclosure information to his office, and thus had not been properly vetted, ahead of their Senate confirmation hearings.
Chaffetz's decision to "bully" Shaub, as Senate Minority leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) put it, rather than investigate the potential conflicts of interest within the incoming Trump administration has sparked outrage among Democratic lawmakers, concerned citizens, as well as government transparency watchdogs.
"First, House Republicans tried to gut the Office of Congressional ethics. Now they're trying to handcuff the Office of Government ethics," Schumer said in a statement. "Mr. Chaffetz's attempt to bully Mr. Shaub out of doing his job are absolutely despicable."
On Friday, 20 government accountability groups and ethics experts wrote to Chaffetz requesting that any inquiry into OGE is "bipartisan, held in public, addresses the Trump administration's potential conflicts-of-interest, and is calibrated to interfere as little as possible with OGE's ongoing activities of reviewing the incoming adminsitration's complicance with ethical requirements."
The signatories, which include law professor Zephyr Teachout, Public Citizen, Common Cause, and the Center for Media Democracy, continue:
The House Oversight and Government Reform Committee clearly has jurisdiction over OGE and we do not quibble with the proper exercise of its oversight authority.
Nevertheless, we cannot help but be alarmed by a letter that: (1) lacks bipartisan support; (2) unreasonably demands the head of OGE and possibly OGE staff be interviewed during the peak time they are vetting President Elect Trump and his nominee's ethics forms; (3) does not address the underlying issues of whether President Elect Trump and his nominees are complying with government ethics requirements; and (4) does not meet the reasonable accommodation of holding such an inquiry in public.
Simiarly, Rep. Elijah Cummings, the top Democrat on the Oversight Committee, also wrote Chaffetz asking that the committee invite Shaub to present "public testimony" next week "regarding President-Elect Donald Trump's massive global business entanglements."
"I believe it is imperative," Cummings wrote, "that Director Shaub be permitted to testify in public--before the American people--to avoid any perception that he is being unfairly targeted behind closed doors for expressing his views."
Perhaps Cummings' word of caution came too late, as many observers seized on the news of Chaffetz's threat to chastise--and mock--the Republican's misguided investigation:
Why investigate the crook entering the Oval Office with no ethics? Just investigate the ethics chief. #DrainTheSwamp https://t.co/dWqyCqinrq
-- Keith Boykin (@keithboykin) January 13, 2017
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Lauren McCauley
Lauren McCauley is a former senior editor for Common Dreams covering national and international politics and progressive news. She is now the Editor of Maine Morning Star. Lauren also helped produce a number of documentary films, including the award-winning Soundtrack for a Revolution and The Hollywood Complex, as well as one currently in production about civil rights icon James Meredith. Her writing has been featured on Newsweek, BillMoyers.com, TruthDig, Truthout, In These Times, and Extra! the newsletter of Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting. She currently lives in Kennebunk, Maine with her husband, two children, a dog, and several chickens.
Instead of investigating concerns that President-elect Donald Trump will come to power with numerous conflicts of interest, the Republican head of the House Oversight Committee is now threatening the government ethics monitor who called them out.
Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah) sent a letter (pdf) to Walter Shaub, head of the Office of Government Ethics (OGE), admonishing him for "blurring the lines between public relations and official ethics guidance," citing a series of OGE tweets encouraging President-elect to commit to "full divestiture" of his business holdings (which he has refused to do.)
In the letter, Chaffetz warns Shaub that the OGE's operations are being examined by the committee and then demands that he make himself available "for a transcribed interview with the Committee staff as soon as possible, but not later than January 31, 2017."
What's more, in an interview with Politico, Chaffetz said he would go so far as to subpoena Shaub "if we have to."
Notably, the letter was issued one day after Shaub publicly denounced the president-elect for his ethics failures, particularly Trump's plan to hand his business empire over to his sons--an arrangement Shaub described as "meaningless."
Shaub also in recent days has expressed "great concern" that a number of Trump's cabinet nominees had not submitted financial disclosure information to his office, and thus had not been properly vetted, ahead of their Senate confirmation hearings.
Chaffetz's decision to "bully" Shaub, as Senate Minority leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) put it, rather than investigate the potential conflicts of interest within the incoming Trump administration has sparked outrage among Democratic lawmakers, concerned citizens, as well as government transparency watchdogs.
"First, House Republicans tried to gut the Office of Congressional ethics. Now they're trying to handcuff the Office of Government ethics," Schumer said in a statement. "Mr. Chaffetz's attempt to bully Mr. Shaub out of doing his job are absolutely despicable."
On Friday, 20 government accountability groups and ethics experts wrote to Chaffetz requesting that any inquiry into OGE is "bipartisan, held in public, addresses the Trump administration's potential conflicts-of-interest, and is calibrated to interfere as little as possible with OGE's ongoing activities of reviewing the incoming adminsitration's complicance with ethical requirements."
The signatories, which include law professor Zephyr Teachout, Public Citizen, Common Cause, and the Center for Media Democracy, continue:
The House Oversight and Government Reform Committee clearly has jurisdiction over OGE and we do not quibble with the proper exercise of its oversight authority.
Nevertheless, we cannot help but be alarmed by a letter that: (1) lacks bipartisan support; (2) unreasonably demands the head of OGE and possibly OGE staff be interviewed during the peak time they are vetting President Elect Trump and his nominee's ethics forms; (3) does not address the underlying issues of whether President Elect Trump and his nominees are complying with government ethics requirements; and (4) does not meet the reasonable accommodation of holding such an inquiry in public.
Simiarly, Rep. Elijah Cummings, the top Democrat on the Oversight Committee, also wrote Chaffetz asking that the committee invite Shaub to present "public testimony" next week "regarding President-Elect Donald Trump's massive global business entanglements."
"I believe it is imperative," Cummings wrote, "that Director Shaub be permitted to testify in public--before the American people--to avoid any perception that he is being unfairly targeted behind closed doors for expressing his views."
Perhaps Cummings' word of caution came too late, as many observers seized on the news of Chaffetz's threat to chastise--and mock--the Republican's misguided investigation:
Why investigate the crook entering the Oval Office with no ethics? Just investigate the ethics chief. #DrainTheSwamp https://t.co/dWqyCqinrq
-- Keith Boykin (@keithboykin) January 13, 2017
Lauren McCauley
Lauren McCauley is a former senior editor for Common Dreams covering national and international politics and progressive news. She is now the Editor of Maine Morning Star. Lauren also helped produce a number of documentary films, including the award-winning Soundtrack for a Revolution and The Hollywood Complex, as well as one currently in production about civil rights icon James Meredith. Her writing has been featured on Newsweek, BillMoyers.com, TruthDig, Truthout, In These Times, and Extra! the newsletter of Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting. She currently lives in Kennebunk, Maine with her husband, two children, a dog, and several chickens.
Instead of investigating concerns that President-elect Donald Trump will come to power with numerous conflicts of interest, the Republican head of the House Oversight Committee is now threatening the government ethics monitor who called them out.
Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah) sent a letter (pdf) to Walter Shaub, head of the Office of Government Ethics (OGE), admonishing him for "blurring the lines between public relations and official ethics guidance," citing a series of OGE tweets encouraging President-elect to commit to "full divestiture" of his business holdings (which he has refused to do.)
In the letter, Chaffetz warns Shaub that the OGE's operations are being examined by the committee and then demands that he make himself available "for a transcribed interview with the Committee staff as soon as possible, but not later than January 31, 2017."
What's more, in an interview with Politico, Chaffetz said he would go so far as to subpoena Shaub "if we have to."
Notably, the letter was issued one day after Shaub publicly denounced the president-elect for his ethics failures, particularly Trump's plan to hand his business empire over to his sons--an arrangement Shaub described as "meaningless."
Shaub also in recent days has expressed "great concern" that a number of Trump's cabinet nominees had not submitted financial disclosure information to his office, and thus had not been properly vetted, ahead of their Senate confirmation hearings.
Chaffetz's decision to "bully" Shaub, as Senate Minority leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) put it, rather than investigate the potential conflicts of interest within the incoming Trump administration has sparked outrage among Democratic lawmakers, concerned citizens, as well as government transparency watchdogs.
"First, House Republicans tried to gut the Office of Congressional ethics. Now they're trying to handcuff the Office of Government ethics," Schumer said in a statement. "Mr. Chaffetz's attempt to bully Mr. Shaub out of doing his job are absolutely despicable."
On Friday, 20 government accountability groups and ethics experts wrote to Chaffetz requesting that any inquiry into OGE is "bipartisan, held in public, addresses the Trump administration's potential conflicts-of-interest, and is calibrated to interfere as little as possible with OGE's ongoing activities of reviewing the incoming adminsitration's complicance with ethical requirements."
The signatories, which include law professor Zephyr Teachout, Public Citizen, Common Cause, and the Center for Media Democracy, continue:
The House Oversight and Government Reform Committee clearly has jurisdiction over OGE and we do not quibble with the proper exercise of its oversight authority.
Nevertheless, we cannot help but be alarmed by a letter that: (1) lacks bipartisan support; (2) unreasonably demands the head of OGE and possibly OGE staff be interviewed during the peak time they are vetting President Elect Trump and his nominee's ethics forms; (3) does not address the underlying issues of whether President Elect Trump and his nominees are complying with government ethics requirements; and (4) does not meet the reasonable accommodation of holding such an inquiry in public.
Simiarly, Rep. Elijah Cummings, the top Democrat on the Oversight Committee, also wrote Chaffetz asking that the committee invite Shaub to present "public testimony" next week "regarding President-Elect Donald Trump's massive global business entanglements."
"I believe it is imperative," Cummings wrote, "that Director Shaub be permitted to testify in public--before the American people--to avoid any perception that he is being unfairly targeted behind closed doors for expressing his views."
Perhaps Cummings' word of caution came too late, as many observers seized on the news of Chaffetz's threat to chastise--and mock--the Republican's misguided investigation:
Why investigate the crook entering the Oval Office with no ethics? Just investigate the ethics chief. #DrainTheSwamp https://t.co/dWqyCqinrq
-- Keith Boykin (@keithboykin) January 13, 2017
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.