GOP Leader Threatens to Subpoena Ethics Chief Who Called Out Trump Conflicts
Rep. Jason Chaffetz, the Republican leader of the House Oversight Committee, issued a not so veiled threat against the head of the Office of Government Ethics
Instead of investigating concerns that President-elect Donald Trump will come to power with numerous conflicts of interest, the Republican head of the House Oversight Committee is now threatening the government ethics monitor who called them out.
Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah) sent a letter (pdf) to Walter Shaub, head of the Office of Government Ethics (OGE), admonishing him for "blurring the lines between public relations and official ethics guidance," citing a series of OGE tweets encouraging President-elect to commit to "full divestiture" of his business holdings (which he has refused to do.)
In the letter, Chaffetz warns Shaub that the OGE's operations are being examined by the committee and then demands that he make himself available "for a transcribed interview with the Committee staff as soon as possible, but not later than January 31, 2017."
What's more, in an interview with Politico, Chaffetz said he would go so far as to subpoena Shaub "if we have to."
Notably, the letter was issued one day after Shaub publicly denounced the president-elect for his ethics failures, particularly Trump's plan to hand his business empire over to his sons--an arrangement Shaub described as "meaningless."
Shaub also in recent days has expressed "great concern" that a number of Trump's cabinet nominees had not submitted financial disclosure information to his office, and thus had not been properly vetted, ahead of their Senate confirmation hearings.
Chaffetz's decision to "bully" Shaub, as Senate Minority leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) put it, rather than investigate the potential conflicts of interest within the incoming Trump administration has sparked outrage among Democratic lawmakers, concerned citizens, as well as government transparency watchdogs.
"First, House Republicans tried to gut the Office of Congressional ethics. Now they're trying to handcuff the Office of Government ethics," Schumer said in a statement. "Mr. Chaffetz's attempt to bully Mr. Shaub out of doing his job are absolutely despicable."
On Friday, 20 government accountability groups and ethics experts wrote to Chaffetz requesting that any inquiry into OGE is "bipartisan, held in public, addresses the Trump administration's potential conflicts-of-interest, and is calibrated to interfere as little as possible with OGE's ongoing activities of reviewing the incoming adminsitration's complicance with ethical requirements."
The signatories, which include law professor Zephyr Teachout, Public Citizen, Common Cause, and the Center for Media Democracy, continue:
The House Oversight and Government Reform Committee clearly has jurisdiction over OGE and we do not quibble with the proper exercise of its oversight authority.
Nevertheless, we cannot help but be alarmed by a letter that: (1) lacks bipartisan support; (2) unreasonably demands the head of OGE and possibly OGE staff be interviewed during the peak time they are vetting President Elect Trump and his nominee's ethics forms; (3) does not address the underlying issues of whether President Elect Trump and his nominees are complying with government ethics requirements; and (4) does not meet the reasonable accommodation of holding such an inquiry in public.
Simiarly, Rep. Elijah Cummings, the top Democrat on the Oversight Committee, also wrote Chaffetz asking that the committee invite Shaub to present "public testimony" next week "regarding President-Elect Donald Trump's massive global business entanglements."
"I believe it is imperative," Cummings wrote, "that Director Shaub be permitted to testify in public--before the American people--to avoid any perception that he is being unfairly targeted behind closed doors for expressing his views."
Perhaps Cummings' word of caution came too late, as many observers seized on the news of Chaffetz's threat to chastise--and mock--the Republican's misguided investigation:
Why investigate the crook entering the Oval Office with no ethics? Just investigate the ethics chief. #DrainTheSwamp https://t.co/dWqyCqinrq
-- Keith Boykin (@keithboykin) January 13, 2017
We are at a crossroads
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. In a few short weeks, US voters will have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. Our Fall Campaign is underway, and we need your help. To power our newsroom through the rest of the year, we need to raise $125,000 by midnight on October 31. So if you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
Instead of investigating concerns that President-elect Donald Trump will come to power with numerous conflicts of interest, the Republican head of the House Oversight Committee is now threatening the government ethics monitor who called them out.
Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah) sent a letter (pdf) to Walter Shaub, head of the Office of Government Ethics (OGE), admonishing him for "blurring the lines between public relations and official ethics guidance," citing a series of OGE tweets encouraging President-elect to commit to "full divestiture" of his business holdings (which he has refused to do.)
In the letter, Chaffetz warns Shaub that the OGE's operations are being examined by the committee and then demands that he make himself available "for a transcribed interview with the Committee staff as soon as possible, but not later than January 31, 2017."
What's more, in an interview with Politico, Chaffetz said he would go so far as to subpoena Shaub "if we have to."
Notably, the letter was issued one day after Shaub publicly denounced the president-elect for his ethics failures, particularly Trump's plan to hand his business empire over to his sons--an arrangement Shaub described as "meaningless."
Shaub also in recent days has expressed "great concern" that a number of Trump's cabinet nominees had not submitted financial disclosure information to his office, and thus had not been properly vetted, ahead of their Senate confirmation hearings.
Chaffetz's decision to "bully" Shaub, as Senate Minority leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) put it, rather than investigate the potential conflicts of interest within the incoming Trump administration has sparked outrage among Democratic lawmakers, concerned citizens, as well as government transparency watchdogs.
"First, House Republicans tried to gut the Office of Congressional ethics. Now they're trying to handcuff the Office of Government ethics," Schumer said in a statement. "Mr. Chaffetz's attempt to bully Mr. Shaub out of doing his job are absolutely despicable."
On Friday, 20 government accountability groups and ethics experts wrote to Chaffetz requesting that any inquiry into OGE is "bipartisan, held in public, addresses the Trump administration's potential conflicts-of-interest, and is calibrated to interfere as little as possible with OGE's ongoing activities of reviewing the incoming adminsitration's complicance with ethical requirements."
The signatories, which include law professor Zephyr Teachout, Public Citizen, Common Cause, and the Center for Media Democracy, continue:
The House Oversight and Government Reform Committee clearly has jurisdiction over OGE and we do not quibble with the proper exercise of its oversight authority.
Nevertheless, we cannot help but be alarmed by a letter that: (1) lacks bipartisan support; (2) unreasonably demands the head of OGE and possibly OGE staff be interviewed during the peak time they are vetting President Elect Trump and his nominee's ethics forms; (3) does not address the underlying issues of whether President Elect Trump and his nominees are complying with government ethics requirements; and (4) does not meet the reasonable accommodation of holding such an inquiry in public.
Simiarly, Rep. Elijah Cummings, the top Democrat on the Oversight Committee, also wrote Chaffetz asking that the committee invite Shaub to present "public testimony" next week "regarding President-Elect Donald Trump's massive global business entanglements."
"I believe it is imperative," Cummings wrote, "that Director Shaub be permitted to testify in public--before the American people--to avoid any perception that he is being unfairly targeted behind closed doors for expressing his views."
Perhaps Cummings' word of caution came too late, as many observers seized on the news of Chaffetz's threat to chastise--and mock--the Republican's misguided investigation:
Why investigate the crook entering the Oval Office with no ethics? Just investigate the ethics chief. #DrainTheSwamp https://t.co/dWqyCqinrq
-- Keith Boykin (@keithboykin) January 13, 2017
Instead of investigating concerns that President-elect Donald Trump will come to power with numerous conflicts of interest, the Republican head of the House Oversight Committee is now threatening the government ethics monitor who called them out.
Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah) sent a letter (pdf) to Walter Shaub, head of the Office of Government Ethics (OGE), admonishing him for "blurring the lines between public relations and official ethics guidance," citing a series of OGE tweets encouraging President-elect to commit to "full divestiture" of his business holdings (which he has refused to do.)
In the letter, Chaffetz warns Shaub that the OGE's operations are being examined by the committee and then demands that he make himself available "for a transcribed interview with the Committee staff as soon as possible, but not later than January 31, 2017."
What's more, in an interview with Politico, Chaffetz said he would go so far as to subpoena Shaub "if we have to."
Notably, the letter was issued one day after Shaub publicly denounced the president-elect for his ethics failures, particularly Trump's plan to hand his business empire over to his sons--an arrangement Shaub described as "meaningless."
Shaub also in recent days has expressed "great concern" that a number of Trump's cabinet nominees had not submitted financial disclosure information to his office, and thus had not been properly vetted, ahead of their Senate confirmation hearings.
Chaffetz's decision to "bully" Shaub, as Senate Minority leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) put it, rather than investigate the potential conflicts of interest within the incoming Trump administration has sparked outrage among Democratic lawmakers, concerned citizens, as well as government transparency watchdogs.
"First, House Republicans tried to gut the Office of Congressional ethics. Now they're trying to handcuff the Office of Government ethics," Schumer said in a statement. "Mr. Chaffetz's attempt to bully Mr. Shaub out of doing his job are absolutely despicable."
On Friday, 20 government accountability groups and ethics experts wrote to Chaffetz requesting that any inquiry into OGE is "bipartisan, held in public, addresses the Trump administration's potential conflicts-of-interest, and is calibrated to interfere as little as possible with OGE's ongoing activities of reviewing the incoming adminsitration's complicance with ethical requirements."
The signatories, which include law professor Zephyr Teachout, Public Citizen, Common Cause, and the Center for Media Democracy, continue:
The House Oversight and Government Reform Committee clearly has jurisdiction over OGE and we do not quibble with the proper exercise of its oversight authority.
Nevertheless, we cannot help but be alarmed by a letter that: (1) lacks bipartisan support; (2) unreasonably demands the head of OGE and possibly OGE staff be interviewed during the peak time they are vetting President Elect Trump and his nominee's ethics forms; (3) does not address the underlying issues of whether President Elect Trump and his nominees are complying with government ethics requirements; and (4) does not meet the reasonable accommodation of holding such an inquiry in public.
Simiarly, Rep. Elijah Cummings, the top Democrat on the Oversight Committee, also wrote Chaffetz asking that the committee invite Shaub to present "public testimony" next week "regarding President-Elect Donald Trump's massive global business entanglements."
"I believe it is imperative," Cummings wrote, "that Director Shaub be permitted to testify in public--before the American people--to avoid any perception that he is being unfairly targeted behind closed doors for expressing his views."
Perhaps Cummings' word of caution came too late, as many observers seized on the news of Chaffetz's threat to chastise--and mock--the Republican's misguided investigation:
Why investigate the crook entering the Oval Office with no ethics? Just investigate the ethics chief. #DrainTheSwamp https://t.co/dWqyCqinrq
-- Keith Boykin (@keithboykin) January 13, 2017