

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Vice President Mike Pence and other male advisors look on as President Donald Trump deals blow to women worldwide. (Photo: Getty)
The Trump administration's regressive move to reinstate the so-called Global Gag Rule is being met with outrage from women's health advocates around the world, who say the decision is short-sighted, dangerous, and discriminatory.
The rule, officially known as the Mexico City Policy, prohibits international organizations from receiving U.S. family planning funding if they mention or provide information about abortion, or even refer for abortion services. Since its inception under former President Ronald Reagan, it has been alternately enforced and rescinded by Republican and Democratic presidents over several administrations.
On Monday, Trump put it back in place after former President Barack Obama reversed it in 2009.
"Today President Donald Trump made clear that women will be the first casualty of his administration," said Nancy Northup, president and CEO of the Center for Reproductive Rights. "Trump's Global Gag Rule will only lead to increases in unintended pregnancies, unsafe abortions, maternal and newborn deaths. This harmful policy undermines American democratic values of free-speech and imposes an anti-woman agenda."
Indeed, many pointed to a 2015 analysis from the Guttmacher Institute, which found that "[w]hen enforced, it has led to the closing of some of the developing world's most effective family planning programs."
Furthermore, according to the institute, which works to advance sexual and reproductive health and rights in the U.S. and abroad through research, the rule actually works against its ostensible goal--to reduce abortions worldwide:
Several organizations have documented the devastating impact of the global gag rule. When the policy has been in effect, health providers have been forced to fire staff, reduce their services, or even close their clinics altogether. Thousands of women lost access to family planning and reproductive health services from trusted local providers--sometimes the only provider of these services in their community--putting them at risk of unintended pregnancy and unsafe abortion.
After President George W. Bush reimposed the gag rule in 2001, a consortium of NGOs led by Population Action International organized a study to assess the policy's effects. Between 2002 and 2006, the research teams made site visits to the Dominican Republic, Ethiopia, Ghana, Kenya, Nepal, Tanzania, Zambia, and Zimbabwe. They found that in Kenya, for example, the gag rule led to the termination of critical activities run by the Family Planning Association of Kenya and Marie Stopes International (MSI) Kenya--the leading providers of health care to people living in poor and rural communities in the country. In addition, enforcement of the policy drastically curtailed community-based outreach activities and the flow and availability of contraceptive supplies. Government clinics, exempt from the gag rule, were never able to pick up the slack nor regain the trust of women turned away by the NGOs.
"Undermining access to family planning services ultimately hurts women by denying them the tools they need to prevent unwanted pregnancies--and, therefore, to avert abortions," wrote Sneha Barot and Susan Cohen for Guttmacher. "Placing legal barriers between women's reproductive health needs and desires and their access to safe abortion services only leads to unsafe abortion. History has shown that the gag rule has done and can do nothing to alter this reality, except to exacerbate it."
Similar findings have come out of both Population Action International (pdf) and the Center for Reproductive Rights.
Saying Trump's action "ignores decades of research, instead favoring ideological politics over women and families," Sen. Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.) vowed to introduce legislation Tuesday to "repeal the Global Gag Rule for good."
Other lawmakers joined her in denouncing the move online:
\u201cReinstatement of the Global Gag Rule will deny lifesaving health care to countless women & girls around the world. This is shameful!\u201d— Rep. Barbara Lee (@Rep. Barbara Lee) 1485192750
\u201cThe Global Gag Rule, which Donald Trump reinstated today, will put millions of the most vulnerable women around the world at risk.\u201d— Keith Ellison (@Keith Ellison) 1485217310
\u201c.@POTUS Trump is reinstating the \u201cglobal gag rule\u201d to stop funding for overseas health centers that may provide abortion. This is insanity.\u201d— Elizabeth Warren (@Elizabeth Warren) 1485205970
Others noted that while the executive order bears Trump's signature, the move was likely a top priority for anti-choice Vice President Mike Pence.
\u201cTantrum Donnie: I am mad at the women, what can we do?\nPuppet master Pence: Reinstate #GlobalGagRule THAT kills women all over the world\u201d— Dr. Melissa Bird (@Dr. Melissa Bird) 1485198757
\u201cPence hovers over Trump's shoulder to make sure that he reinstates #globalgagrule, jeopardizing women's access to healthcare worldwide.\u201d— Mark J.K. Penzkover (@Mark J.K. Penzkover) 1485225411
\u201cPence is behind the reinstatement of the Global Gag Rule. & you bet all he had to do to sell it to Trump was \u201cit will be a positive story."\u201d— Mx. D. E. Anderson (@Mx. D. E. Anderson) 1485203763
\u201cThe global gag rule is 100% Pence. https://t.co/xj6HEZnuAR\u201d— Rebekah (she/her) (@Rebekah (she/her)) 1485194799
"This action--taken two days after millions of people across the world marched to affirm women's rights as human rights and the right to bodily autonomy, and one day after the anniversary of Roe v. Wade--shows how out of step this administration is with the needs of women both at home and abroad," said Teresa C. Younger, president and CEO of the Ms. Foundation for Women.
"Rather than engage in a conversation about why it is critical to expand access to comprehensive health care globally, including abortion, this administration is already using its executive power to export dangerous anti-choice policies, penalize frontline reproductive health service providers, and punish low-income women trying to access essential health care," she continued. "But make no mistake: we will not go back. This first action by the Trump-Pence administration is a harbinger for the fight for reproductive justice that we will all need to engage in full force."
Watch Democracy Now!'s segment on the Global Gag Rule below:
Trump and Musk are on an unconstitutional rampage, aiming for virtually every corner of the federal government. These two right-wing billionaires are targeting nurses, scientists, teachers, daycare providers, judges, veterans, air traffic controllers, and nuclear safety inspectors. No one is safe. The food stamps program, Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid are next. It’s an unprecedented disaster and a five-alarm fire, but there will be a reckoning. The people did not vote for this. The American people do not want this dystopian hellscape that hides behind claims of “efficiency.” Still, in reality, it is all a giveaway to corporate interests and the libertarian dreams of far-right oligarchs like Musk. Common Dreams is playing a vital role by reporting day and night on this orgy of corruption and greed, as well as what everyday people can do to organize and fight back. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover issues the corporate media never will, but we can only continue with our readers’ support. |
The Trump administration's regressive move to reinstate the so-called Global Gag Rule is being met with outrage from women's health advocates around the world, who say the decision is short-sighted, dangerous, and discriminatory.
The rule, officially known as the Mexico City Policy, prohibits international organizations from receiving U.S. family planning funding if they mention or provide information about abortion, or even refer for abortion services. Since its inception under former President Ronald Reagan, it has been alternately enforced and rescinded by Republican and Democratic presidents over several administrations.
On Monday, Trump put it back in place after former President Barack Obama reversed it in 2009.
"Today President Donald Trump made clear that women will be the first casualty of his administration," said Nancy Northup, president and CEO of the Center for Reproductive Rights. "Trump's Global Gag Rule will only lead to increases in unintended pregnancies, unsafe abortions, maternal and newborn deaths. This harmful policy undermines American democratic values of free-speech and imposes an anti-woman agenda."
Indeed, many pointed to a 2015 analysis from the Guttmacher Institute, which found that "[w]hen enforced, it has led to the closing of some of the developing world's most effective family planning programs."
Furthermore, according to the institute, which works to advance sexual and reproductive health and rights in the U.S. and abroad through research, the rule actually works against its ostensible goal--to reduce abortions worldwide:
Several organizations have documented the devastating impact of the global gag rule. When the policy has been in effect, health providers have been forced to fire staff, reduce their services, or even close their clinics altogether. Thousands of women lost access to family planning and reproductive health services from trusted local providers--sometimes the only provider of these services in their community--putting them at risk of unintended pregnancy and unsafe abortion.
After President George W. Bush reimposed the gag rule in 2001, a consortium of NGOs led by Population Action International organized a study to assess the policy's effects. Between 2002 and 2006, the research teams made site visits to the Dominican Republic, Ethiopia, Ghana, Kenya, Nepal, Tanzania, Zambia, and Zimbabwe. They found that in Kenya, for example, the gag rule led to the termination of critical activities run by the Family Planning Association of Kenya and Marie Stopes International (MSI) Kenya--the leading providers of health care to people living in poor and rural communities in the country. In addition, enforcement of the policy drastically curtailed community-based outreach activities and the flow and availability of contraceptive supplies. Government clinics, exempt from the gag rule, were never able to pick up the slack nor regain the trust of women turned away by the NGOs.
"Undermining access to family planning services ultimately hurts women by denying them the tools they need to prevent unwanted pregnancies--and, therefore, to avert abortions," wrote Sneha Barot and Susan Cohen for Guttmacher. "Placing legal barriers between women's reproductive health needs and desires and their access to safe abortion services only leads to unsafe abortion. History has shown that the gag rule has done and can do nothing to alter this reality, except to exacerbate it."
Similar findings have come out of both Population Action International (pdf) and the Center for Reproductive Rights.
Saying Trump's action "ignores decades of research, instead favoring ideological politics over women and families," Sen. Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.) vowed to introduce legislation Tuesday to "repeal the Global Gag Rule for good."
Other lawmakers joined her in denouncing the move online:
\u201cReinstatement of the Global Gag Rule will deny lifesaving health care to countless women & girls around the world. This is shameful!\u201d— Rep. Barbara Lee (@Rep. Barbara Lee) 1485192750
\u201cThe Global Gag Rule, which Donald Trump reinstated today, will put millions of the most vulnerable women around the world at risk.\u201d— Keith Ellison (@Keith Ellison) 1485217310
\u201c.@POTUS Trump is reinstating the \u201cglobal gag rule\u201d to stop funding for overseas health centers that may provide abortion. This is insanity.\u201d— Elizabeth Warren (@Elizabeth Warren) 1485205970
Others noted that while the executive order bears Trump's signature, the move was likely a top priority for anti-choice Vice President Mike Pence.
\u201cTantrum Donnie: I am mad at the women, what can we do?\nPuppet master Pence: Reinstate #GlobalGagRule THAT kills women all over the world\u201d— Dr. Melissa Bird (@Dr. Melissa Bird) 1485198757
\u201cPence hovers over Trump's shoulder to make sure that he reinstates #globalgagrule, jeopardizing women's access to healthcare worldwide.\u201d— Mark J.K. Penzkover (@Mark J.K. Penzkover) 1485225411
\u201cPence is behind the reinstatement of the Global Gag Rule. & you bet all he had to do to sell it to Trump was \u201cit will be a positive story."\u201d— Mx. D. E. Anderson (@Mx. D. E. Anderson) 1485203763
\u201cThe global gag rule is 100% Pence. https://t.co/xj6HEZnuAR\u201d— Rebekah (she/her) (@Rebekah (she/her)) 1485194799
"This action--taken two days after millions of people across the world marched to affirm women's rights as human rights and the right to bodily autonomy, and one day after the anniversary of Roe v. Wade--shows how out of step this administration is with the needs of women both at home and abroad," said Teresa C. Younger, president and CEO of the Ms. Foundation for Women.
"Rather than engage in a conversation about why it is critical to expand access to comprehensive health care globally, including abortion, this administration is already using its executive power to export dangerous anti-choice policies, penalize frontline reproductive health service providers, and punish low-income women trying to access essential health care," she continued. "But make no mistake: we will not go back. This first action by the Trump-Pence administration is a harbinger for the fight for reproductive justice that we will all need to engage in full force."
Watch Democracy Now!'s segment on the Global Gag Rule below:
The Trump administration's regressive move to reinstate the so-called Global Gag Rule is being met with outrage from women's health advocates around the world, who say the decision is short-sighted, dangerous, and discriminatory.
The rule, officially known as the Mexico City Policy, prohibits international organizations from receiving U.S. family planning funding if they mention or provide information about abortion, or even refer for abortion services. Since its inception under former President Ronald Reagan, it has been alternately enforced and rescinded by Republican and Democratic presidents over several administrations.
On Monday, Trump put it back in place after former President Barack Obama reversed it in 2009.
"Today President Donald Trump made clear that women will be the first casualty of his administration," said Nancy Northup, president and CEO of the Center for Reproductive Rights. "Trump's Global Gag Rule will only lead to increases in unintended pregnancies, unsafe abortions, maternal and newborn deaths. This harmful policy undermines American democratic values of free-speech and imposes an anti-woman agenda."
Indeed, many pointed to a 2015 analysis from the Guttmacher Institute, which found that "[w]hen enforced, it has led to the closing of some of the developing world's most effective family planning programs."
Furthermore, according to the institute, which works to advance sexual and reproductive health and rights in the U.S. and abroad through research, the rule actually works against its ostensible goal--to reduce abortions worldwide:
Several organizations have documented the devastating impact of the global gag rule. When the policy has been in effect, health providers have been forced to fire staff, reduce their services, or even close their clinics altogether. Thousands of women lost access to family planning and reproductive health services from trusted local providers--sometimes the only provider of these services in their community--putting them at risk of unintended pregnancy and unsafe abortion.
After President George W. Bush reimposed the gag rule in 2001, a consortium of NGOs led by Population Action International organized a study to assess the policy's effects. Between 2002 and 2006, the research teams made site visits to the Dominican Republic, Ethiopia, Ghana, Kenya, Nepal, Tanzania, Zambia, and Zimbabwe. They found that in Kenya, for example, the gag rule led to the termination of critical activities run by the Family Planning Association of Kenya and Marie Stopes International (MSI) Kenya--the leading providers of health care to people living in poor and rural communities in the country. In addition, enforcement of the policy drastically curtailed community-based outreach activities and the flow and availability of contraceptive supplies. Government clinics, exempt from the gag rule, were never able to pick up the slack nor regain the trust of women turned away by the NGOs.
"Undermining access to family planning services ultimately hurts women by denying them the tools they need to prevent unwanted pregnancies--and, therefore, to avert abortions," wrote Sneha Barot and Susan Cohen for Guttmacher. "Placing legal barriers between women's reproductive health needs and desires and their access to safe abortion services only leads to unsafe abortion. History has shown that the gag rule has done and can do nothing to alter this reality, except to exacerbate it."
Similar findings have come out of both Population Action International (pdf) and the Center for Reproductive Rights.
Saying Trump's action "ignores decades of research, instead favoring ideological politics over women and families," Sen. Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.) vowed to introduce legislation Tuesday to "repeal the Global Gag Rule for good."
Other lawmakers joined her in denouncing the move online:
\u201cReinstatement of the Global Gag Rule will deny lifesaving health care to countless women & girls around the world. This is shameful!\u201d— Rep. Barbara Lee (@Rep. Barbara Lee) 1485192750
\u201cThe Global Gag Rule, which Donald Trump reinstated today, will put millions of the most vulnerable women around the world at risk.\u201d— Keith Ellison (@Keith Ellison) 1485217310
\u201c.@POTUS Trump is reinstating the \u201cglobal gag rule\u201d to stop funding for overseas health centers that may provide abortion. This is insanity.\u201d— Elizabeth Warren (@Elizabeth Warren) 1485205970
Others noted that while the executive order bears Trump's signature, the move was likely a top priority for anti-choice Vice President Mike Pence.
\u201cTantrum Donnie: I am mad at the women, what can we do?\nPuppet master Pence: Reinstate #GlobalGagRule THAT kills women all over the world\u201d— Dr. Melissa Bird (@Dr. Melissa Bird) 1485198757
\u201cPence hovers over Trump's shoulder to make sure that he reinstates #globalgagrule, jeopardizing women's access to healthcare worldwide.\u201d— Mark J.K. Penzkover (@Mark J.K. Penzkover) 1485225411
\u201cPence is behind the reinstatement of the Global Gag Rule. & you bet all he had to do to sell it to Trump was \u201cit will be a positive story."\u201d— Mx. D. E. Anderson (@Mx. D. E. Anderson) 1485203763
\u201cThe global gag rule is 100% Pence. https://t.co/xj6HEZnuAR\u201d— Rebekah (she/her) (@Rebekah (she/her)) 1485194799
"This action--taken two days after millions of people across the world marched to affirm women's rights as human rights and the right to bodily autonomy, and one day after the anniversary of Roe v. Wade--shows how out of step this administration is with the needs of women both at home and abroad," said Teresa C. Younger, president and CEO of the Ms. Foundation for Women.
"Rather than engage in a conversation about why it is critical to expand access to comprehensive health care globally, including abortion, this administration is already using its executive power to export dangerous anti-choice policies, penalize frontline reproductive health service providers, and punish low-income women trying to access essential health care," she continued. "But make no mistake: we will not go back. This first action by the Trump-Pence administration is a harbinger for the fight for reproductive justice that we will all need to engage in full force."
Watch Democracy Now!'s segment on the Global Gag Rule below:
"This was an illegal act," said U.S. District Court Judge Paula Xinis.
A federal court judge on Sunday declared the Trump administration's refusal to return a man they sent to an El Salvadoran prison in "error" as "totally lawless" behavior and ordered the Department of Homeland Security to repatriate the man, Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia, within 24 hours.
In a 22-page ruling, U.S. District Judge Paula Xinis doubled down on an order issued Friday, which Department of Justice lawyers representing the administration said was an affront to his executive authority.
"This was an illegal act," Xinis said of DHS Secretary Krisi Noem's attack on Abrego Garcia's rights, including his deportation and imprisonment.
"Defendants seized Abrego Garcia without any lawful authority; held him in three separate domestic detention centers without legal basis; failed to present him to any immigration judge or officer; and forcibly transported him to El Salvador in direct contravention of [immigration law]," the decision states.
Once imprisoned in El Salvador, the order continues, "U.S. officials secured his detention in a facility that, by design, deprives its detainees of adequate food, water, and shelter, fosters routine violence; and places him with his persecutors."
Trump's DOJ appealed Friday's order to 4th Circuit Court of Appeals, based in Virginia, but that court has not yet ruled on the request to stay the order from Xinis, which says Abrego Garcia should be returned to the United States no later than Monday.
"You'd be a fool to think Trump won't go after others he dislikes," warned Sen. Ron Wyden, "including American citizens."
Democratic Sen. Ron Wyden of Oregon slammed the Trump administration over the weekend in response to fresh reporting that the Department of Homeland Security has intensified its push for access to confidential data held by the Internal Revenue Service—part of a sweeping effort to target immigrant workers who pay into the U.S. tax system yet get little or nothing in return.
Wyden denounced the effort, which had the fingerprints of the Elon Musk-led Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE, all over it.
"What Trump and Musk's henchmen are doing by weaponizing taxpayer data is illegal, this abuse of the immigrant community is a moral atrocity, and you'd be a fool to think Trump won't go after others he dislikes, including American citizens," said Wyden, ranking member of the U.S. Senate Finance Committee, on Saturday.
Last week, the White House admitted one of the men it has sent to a prison in El Salvador was detained and deported in schackles in "error." Despite the admitted mistake, and facing a lawsuit for his immediate return, the Trump administration says a federal court has no authority over the president to make such an order.
"Even though the Trump administration claims it's focused on undocumented immigrants, it's obvious that they do not care when they make mistakes and ruin the lives of legal residents and American citizens in the process," Wyden continued. "A repressive scheme on the scale of what they're talking about at the IRS would lead to hundreds if not thousands of those horrific mistakes, and the people who are disappeared as a result may never be returned to their families."
According to the Washington Post reporting on Saturday:
Federal immigration officials are seeking to locate up to 7 million people suspected of being in the United States unlawfully by accessing confidential tax data at the Internal Revenue Service, according to six people familiar with the request, a dramatic escalation in how the Trump administration aims to use the tax system to detain and deport immigrants.
Officials from the Department of Homeland Security had previously sought the IRS’s help in finding 700,000 people who are subject to final removal orders, and they had asked the IRS to use closely guarded taxpayer data systems to provide names and addresses.
As the Post notes, it would be highly unusual, and quite possibly unlawful, for the IRS to share such confidential data. "Normally," the newspaper reports, "personal tax information—even an individual's name and address—is considered confidential and closely guarded within the IRS."
Wyden warned that those who violate the law by disclosing personal tax data face the risk of civil sanction or even prosecution.
"While Trump's sycophants and the DOGE boys may be a lost cause," Wyden said, "IRS personnel need to think long and hard about whether they want to be a part of an effort to round up innocent people and send them to be locked away in foreign torture prisons."
"I'm sure Trump has promised pardons to the people who will commit crimes in the process of abusing legally-protected taxpayer data, but violations of taxpayer privacy laws carry hefty civil penalties too, and Trump cannot pardon anybody out from under those," he said. "I'm going to demand answers from the acting IRS commissioner immediately about this outrageous abuse of the agency.”
"I think that the Democratic Party has to make a fundamental decision," says the independent Senator from Vermont, "and I'm not sure that they will make the right decision."
"I think when we talk about America is a democracy, I think we should rephrase it, call it a 'pseudo-democracy.'"
That's what Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) said Sunday morning in response to questions from CBS News about the state of the nation, with President Donald Trump gutting the federal government from head to toe, challenging constitutional norms, allowing his cabinet of billionaires to run key agencies they philosophically want to destroy, and empowering Elon Musk—the world's richest person—to run roughshod over public education, undermine healthcare programs like Medicare and Medicaid, and attack Social Security.
Taking a weekend away from his ongoing "Fight Oligarchy" tour, which has drawn record crowds in both right-leaning and left-leaning regions of the country over recent weeks, Sanders said the problem is deeply entrenched now in the nation's political system—and both major parties have a lot to answer for.
"One of the other concerns when I talk about oligarchy," Sanders explained to journalist Robert Acosta, "it's not just massive income and wealth inequality. It's not just the power of the billionaire class. These guys, led by Musk—and as a result of this disastrous Citizens United Supreme Court decision—have now allowed billionaires essentially to own our political process. So, I think when we talk about America is a democracy, I think we should rephrase it, call it a 'pseudo-democracy.' And it's not just Musk and the Republicans; it's billionaires in the Democratic Party as well."
Sanders said that while he's been out on the road in various places, what he perceives—from Americans of all stripes—is a shared sense of dread and frustration.
"I think I'm seeing fear, and I'm seeing anger," he said. "Sixty percent of our people are living paycheck-to-paycheck. Media doesn't talk about it. We don't talk about it enough here in Congress."
In a speech on the floor of the U.S. Senate on Friday night, just before the Republican-controlled chamber was able to pass a sweeping spending resolution that will lay waste to vital programs like Medicaid and food assistance to needy families so that billionaires and the ultra-rich can enjoy even more tax giveaways, Sanders said, "What we have is a budget proposal in front of us that makes bad situations much worse and does virtually nothing to protect the needs of working families."
LIVE: I'm on the floor now talking about Trump's totally absurd budget.
They got it exactly backwards. No tax cuts for billionaires by cutting Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid for Americans. https://t.co/ULB2KosOSJ
— Bernie Sanders (@SenSanders) April 4, 2025
What the GOP spending plan does do, he added, "is reward wealthy campaign contributors by providing over $1 trillion in tax breaks for the top one percent."
"I wish my Republican friends the best of luck when they go home—if they dare to hold town hall meetings—and explain to their constituents why they think, at a time of massive income and wealth inequality, it's a great idea to give tax breaks to billionaires and cut Medicaid, education, and other programs that working class families desperately need."
On Saturday, millions of people took to the street in coordinated protests against the Trump administration's attack on government, the economy, and democracy itself.
Voiced at many of the rallies was also a frustration with the failure of the Democrats to stand up to Trump and offer an alternative vision for what the nation can be. In his CBS News interview, Sanders said the key question Democrats need to be asking is the one too many people in Washington, D.C. tend to avoid.
"Why are [the Democrats] held in so low esteem?" That's the question that needs asking, he said.
"Why has the working class in this country largely turned away from them? And what do you have to do to recapture that working class? Do you think working people are voting for Trump because he wants to give massive tax breaks to billionaires and cut Social Security and Medicare? I don't think so. It's because people say, 'I am hurting. Democratic Party has talked a good game for years. They haven't done anything.' So, I think that the Democratic Party has to make a fundamental decision, and I'm not sure that they will make the right decision, which side are they on? [Will] they continue to hustle large campaign contributions from very, very wealthy people, or do they stand with the working class?"
The next leg of Sanders' "Fight Oligarchy' tour will kick off next Saturday, with stops in California, Utah, and Idaho over four days.
"The American people, whether they are Democrats, Republicans or Independents, do not want billionaires to control our government or buy our elections," said Sanders. "That is why I will be visiting Republican-held districts all over the Western United States. When we are organized and fight back, we can defeat oligarchy."