Civil and human rights experts say the new ban is essentially a scaled-down reprise of Trump's original memo. (Photo: Ted Eytan/flickr/cc)
Mar 08, 2017
Hawaii filed the first legal challenge to President Donald Trump's revised travel ban on Tuesday, asking a judge to temporarily block his executive order the day after it was signed.
The court filing from the office of Hawaii Attorney General Doug Chin argues that the ban--which blocks travelers from six majority-Muslim countries from entering the U.S.--is resulting in "the establishment of religion in the state of Hawaii contrary to its Constitution."
It is also "inflicting immediate damage to Hawaii's economy, educational institutions, and tourism industry; and it is subjecting a portion of the state's citizens to second-class treatment and discrimination, while denying all Hawaii residents the benefits of an inclusive and pluralistic society," the document, filed in U.S. District Court in Honolulu, states.
Hawaii asked Judge Derrick K. Watson for an expedited hearing on the motion to file the temporary restraining order. If he agrees, the court will be able to hear the state's arguments before the ban goes into effect on March 16.
Neal Katyal, a Washington, D.C. attorney who is representing the state, tweeted Tuesday, "Here we go. Proud to stand w/State of Hawaii challenging Pres.Trump's 'new' Executive Order issued yesterday."
\u201cHere we go. Proud to stand w/State of Hawaii challenging Pres.Trump's "new" Executive Order issued yesterday. 1/2 https://t.co/GrPvlPGshL\u201d— Neal Katyal (@Neal Katyal) 1488935167
The order blocks travelers from Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, and Yemen from entering the country for 90 days, and all refugees for 120 days.
It also exempts permanent residents and current visa-holders.
But civil and human rights experts say it is essentially a scaled-down reprise of Trump's original memo, which banned the six countries in addition to Iraq, and banned Syrian refugees indefinitely--leading to its now-infamous "Muslim ban" moniker.
"It's about discrimination," Chin said at a press conference Tuesday. "It's discriminating against people based on their national origin or based on their religion. It's disenfranchising people who are not of the majority race or majority religion. It puts them in a place that smears their culture or a religion that is not accepted by everyone else. And that's wrong."
An Unconstitutional Rampage
Trump and Musk are on an unconstitutional rampage, aiming for virtually every corner of the federal government. These two right-wing billionaires are targeting nurses, scientists, teachers, daycare providers, judges, veterans, air traffic controllers, and nuclear safety inspectors. No one is safe. The food stamps program, Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid are next. It’s an unprecedented disaster and a five-alarm fire, but there will be a reckoning. The people did not vote for this. The American people do not want this dystopian hellscape that hides behind claims of “efficiency.” Still, in reality, it is all a giveaway to corporate interests and the libertarian dreams of far-right oligarchs like Musk. Common Dreams is playing a vital role by reporting day and night on this orgy of corruption and greed, as well as what everyday people can do to organize and fight back. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover issues the corporate media never will, but we can only continue with our readers’ support. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
Hawaii filed the first legal challenge to President Donald Trump's revised travel ban on Tuesday, asking a judge to temporarily block his executive order the day after it was signed.
The court filing from the office of Hawaii Attorney General Doug Chin argues that the ban--which blocks travelers from six majority-Muslim countries from entering the U.S.--is resulting in "the establishment of religion in the state of Hawaii contrary to its Constitution."
It is also "inflicting immediate damage to Hawaii's economy, educational institutions, and tourism industry; and it is subjecting a portion of the state's citizens to second-class treatment and discrimination, while denying all Hawaii residents the benefits of an inclusive and pluralistic society," the document, filed in U.S. District Court in Honolulu, states.
Hawaii asked Judge Derrick K. Watson for an expedited hearing on the motion to file the temporary restraining order. If he agrees, the court will be able to hear the state's arguments before the ban goes into effect on March 16.
Neal Katyal, a Washington, D.C. attorney who is representing the state, tweeted Tuesday, "Here we go. Proud to stand w/State of Hawaii challenging Pres.Trump's 'new' Executive Order issued yesterday."
\u201cHere we go. Proud to stand w/State of Hawaii challenging Pres.Trump's "new" Executive Order issued yesterday. 1/2 https://t.co/GrPvlPGshL\u201d— Neal Katyal (@Neal Katyal) 1488935167
The order blocks travelers from Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, and Yemen from entering the country for 90 days, and all refugees for 120 days.
It also exempts permanent residents and current visa-holders.
But civil and human rights experts say it is essentially a scaled-down reprise of Trump's original memo, which banned the six countries in addition to Iraq, and banned Syrian refugees indefinitely--leading to its now-infamous "Muslim ban" moniker.
"It's about discrimination," Chin said at a press conference Tuesday. "It's discriminating against people based on their national origin or based on their religion. It's disenfranchising people who are not of the majority race or majority religion. It puts them in a place that smears their culture or a religion that is not accepted by everyone else. And that's wrong."
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
Hawaii filed the first legal challenge to President Donald Trump's revised travel ban on Tuesday, asking a judge to temporarily block his executive order the day after it was signed.
The court filing from the office of Hawaii Attorney General Doug Chin argues that the ban--which blocks travelers from six majority-Muslim countries from entering the U.S.--is resulting in "the establishment of religion in the state of Hawaii contrary to its Constitution."
It is also "inflicting immediate damage to Hawaii's economy, educational institutions, and tourism industry; and it is subjecting a portion of the state's citizens to second-class treatment and discrimination, while denying all Hawaii residents the benefits of an inclusive and pluralistic society," the document, filed in U.S. District Court in Honolulu, states.
Hawaii asked Judge Derrick K. Watson for an expedited hearing on the motion to file the temporary restraining order. If he agrees, the court will be able to hear the state's arguments before the ban goes into effect on March 16.
Neal Katyal, a Washington, D.C. attorney who is representing the state, tweeted Tuesday, "Here we go. Proud to stand w/State of Hawaii challenging Pres.Trump's 'new' Executive Order issued yesterday."
\u201cHere we go. Proud to stand w/State of Hawaii challenging Pres.Trump's "new" Executive Order issued yesterday. 1/2 https://t.co/GrPvlPGshL\u201d— Neal Katyal (@Neal Katyal) 1488935167
The order blocks travelers from Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, and Yemen from entering the country for 90 days, and all refugees for 120 days.
It also exempts permanent residents and current visa-holders.
But civil and human rights experts say it is essentially a scaled-down reprise of Trump's original memo, which banned the six countries in addition to Iraq, and banned Syrian refugees indefinitely--leading to its now-infamous "Muslim ban" moniker.
"It's about discrimination," Chin said at a press conference Tuesday. "It's discriminating against people based on their national origin or based on their religion. It's disenfranchising people who are not of the majority race or majority religion. It puts them in a place that smears their culture or a religion that is not accepted by everyone else. And that's wrong."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.