SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Muslim Ban 2.0 Dealt Second Blow in Maryland Court
"Turns out, an illegal Muslim ban by another name is still an illegal Muslim ban"
Mar 16, 2017
Human rights and immigration advocates cheered early Thursday as President Donald Trump's travel ban saw a second decisive legal defeat in a Maryland court.
The Maryland federal judge's decision forbade the order's central provision--a ban on immigration from six Muslim-majority countries--from going into effect, echoing the decision from a federal judge in Hawaii late Wednesday that found the ban was, in fact, the so-called "Muslim ban" promised by Trump multiple times on the campaign trail.
In the Hawaii decision, Judge Derrick K. Watson "flatly rejected the government's argument that a court would have to investigate Mr. Trump's 'veiled psyche' to deduce religious animus," the New York Times reported:
He quoted extensively from the remarks by Mr. Trump that were cited in the lawsuit brought by Hawaii's attorney general, Doug Chin.
"For instance, there is nothing 'veiled' about this press release," Judge Watson wrote, quoting a Trump campaign document titled "Donald J. Trump is calling for a total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States."
"If you plan to unconstitutionally target a group of people because of their faith, it's a good idea not to run around the country announcing this fact," as Ian Millhiser observed in ThinkProgress.
"This should come as no surprise. President Trump's allegedly 'new' executive order banning Muslims isn't new at all," said Steven Goldstein, executive director of the Anne Frank Center for Mutual Respect.
"The President has taken the same ban, still based on his racist targeting of Muslims, and has put it inside a Trojan Horse that has crossed the border into unconstitutional terrain," Goldstein continued. "But no matter how you wrap it, racism is still racism, and a ban targeting any group based on its religion still violates equal protection of the laws."
In fact, Trump himself admitted that the second order was "a watered-down version of the first one" in a speech to supporters in Nashville, Tenn., Wednesday evening.
Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) agreed, tweeting that "an illegal Muslim ban by another name is still an illegal Muslim ban."
After the Hawaii decision, Trump supporters urged each other to boycott Hawaii, sending the #BoycottHawaii hashtag trending on Twitter. But progressives, rights defenders, and immigration advocates immediately flooded the hashtag with support for the island state--and promises to book a vacation:
While defenders of human rights are celebrating, they are also preparing for the long legal battle against the Muslim ban to continue.
The Hawaii decision is "a preliminary decision, but it recognizes that there continue to be problems with the constitutionality of this revised order, particularly with discriminatory intent toward Muslims," Betsy Fisher, policy director at the International Refugee Assistance Project at the Urban Justice Center, told the Times.
Trump was furious about the decision, promising the crowd in Nashville on Wednesday that "[w]e're going to take our case as far as it needs to go, including all the way up to the Supreme Court."
That fight, however, might not be a pleasant one for Trump and his allies, the Times points out: "[T]he legal debate is likely to be a protracted and unusually personal fight for the administration, touching Mr. Trump and a number of his key aides directly and raising the prospect that their public comments and private communications will be scrutinized."
Rights advocates are also reminding supporters that the battle against the Trump administration's right-wing xenophobia has only begun.
"This isn't the end of the fight," wrote the ACLU Action Team in a statement. "Trump's administration has made clear that they will continue to target and discriminate against Muslims, refugees, immigrants, and other vulnerable individuals and communities. Ramping up ICE [Immigration and Customs Enforcement] raids and border patrol, and promises to build a wall, are tactics to sanction a culture of fear, hate, and violence."
And so to help immigrants and refugees who may face anti-Muslim discrimination in airports and at the U.S. border, the ACLU is distributing "Know Your Rights" information in multiple languages. "Knowing them is crucial, now more than ever," the ACLU Action Team said.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Human rights and immigration advocates cheered early Thursday as President Donald Trump's travel ban saw a second decisive legal defeat in a Maryland court.
The Maryland federal judge's decision forbade the order's central provision--a ban on immigration from six Muslim-majority countries--from going into effect, echoing the decision from a federal judge in Hawaii late Wednesday that found the ban was, in fact, the so-called "Muslim ban" promised by Trump multiple times on the campaign trail.
In the Hawaii decision, Judge Derrick K. Watson "flatly rejected the government's argument that a court would have to investigate Mr. Trump's 'veiled psyche' to deduce religious animus," the New York Times reported:
He quoted extensively from the remarks by Mr. Trump that were cited in the lawsuit brought by Hawaii's attorney general, Doug Chin.
"For instance, there is nothing 'veiled' about this press release," Judge Watson wrote, quoting a Trump campaign document titled "Donald J. Trump is calling for a total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States."
"If you plan to unconstitutionally target a group of people because of their faith, it's a good idea not to run around the country announcing this fact," as Ian Millhiser observed in ThinkProgress.
"This should come as no surprise. President Trump's allegedly 'new' executive order banning Muslims isn't new at all," said Steven Goldstein, executive director of the Anne Frank Center for Mutual Respect.
"The President has taken the same ban, still based on his racist targeting of Muslims, and has put it inside a Trojan Horse that has crossed the border into unconstitutional terrain," Goldstein continued. "But no matter how you wrap it, racism is still racism, and a ban targeting any group based on its religion still violates equal protection of the laws."
In fact, Trump himself admitted that the second order was "a watered-down version of the first one" in a speech to supporters in Nashville, Tenn., Wednesday evening.
Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) agreed, tweeting that "an illegal Muslim ban by another name is still an illegal Muslim ban."
After the Hawaii decision, Trump supporters urged each other to boycott Hawaii, sending the #BoycottHawaii hashtag trending on Twitter. But progressives, rights defenders, and immigration advocates immediately flooded the hashtag with support for the island state--and promises to book a vacation:
While defenders of human rights are celebrating, they are also preparing for the long legal battle against the Muslim ban to continue.
The Hawaii decision is "a preliminary decision, but it recognizes that there continue to be problems with the constitutionality of this revised order, particularly with discriminatory intent toward Muslims," Betsy Fisher, policy director at the International Refugee Assistance Project at the Urban Justice Center, told the Times.
Trump was furious about the decision, promising the crowd in Nashville on Wednesday that "[w]e're going to take our case as far as it needs to go, including all the way up to the Supreme Court."
That fight, however, might not be a pleasant one for Trump and his allies, the Times points out: "[T]he legal debate is likely to be a protracted and unusually personal fight for the administration, touching Mr. Trump and a number of his key aides directly and raising the prospect that their public comments and private communications will be scrutinized."
Rights advocates are also reminding supporters that the battle against the Trump administration's right-wing xenophobia has only begun.
"This isn't the end of the fight," wrote the ACLU Action Team in a statement. "Trump's administration has made clear that they will continue to target and discriminate against Muslims, refugees, immigrants, and other vulnerable individuals and communities. Ramping up ICE [Immigration and Customs Enforcement] raids and border patrol, and promises to build a wall, are tactics to sanction a culture of fear, hate, and violence."
And so to help immigrants and refugees who may face anti-Muslim discrimination in airports and at the U.S. border, the ACLU is distributing "Know Your Rights" information in multiple languages. "Knowing them is crucial, now more than ever," the ACLU Action Team said.
Human rights and immigration advocates cheered early Thursday as President Donald Trump's travel ban saw a second decisive legal defeat in a Maryland court.
The Maryland federal judge's decision forbade the order's central provision--a ban on immigration from six Muslim-majority countries--from going into effect, echoing the decision from a federal judge in Hawaii late Wednesday that found the ban was, in fact, the so-called "Muslim ban" promised by Trump multiple times on the campaign trail.
In the Hawaii decision, Judge Derrick K. Watson "flatly rejected the government's argument that a court would have to investigate Mr. Trump's 'veiled psyche' to deduce religious animus," the New York Times reported:
He quoted extensively from the remarks by Mr. Trump that were cited in the lawsuit brought by Hawaii's attorney general, Doug Chin.
"For instance, there is nothing 'veiled' about this press release," Judge Watson wrote, quoting a Trump campaign document titled "Donald J. Trump is calling for a total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States."
"If you plan to unconstitutionally target a group of people because of their faith, it's a good idea not to run around the country announcing this fact," as Ian Millhiser observed in ThinkProgress.
"This should come as no surprise. President Trump's allegedly 'new' executive order banning Muslims isn't new at all," said Steven Goldstein, executive director of the Anne Frank Center for Mutual Respect.
"The President has taken the same ban, still based on his racist targeting of Muslims, and has put it inside a Trojan Horse that has crossed the border into unconstitutional terrain," Goldstein continued. "But no matter how you wrap it, racism is still racism, and a ban targeting any group based on its religion still violates equal protection of the laws."
In fact, Trump himself admitted that the second order was "a watered-down version of the first one" in a speech to supporters in Nashville, Tenn., Wednesday evening.
Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) agreed, tweeting that "an illegal Muslim ban by another name is still an illegal Muslim ban."
After the Hawaii decision, Trump supporters urged each other to boycott Hawaii, sending the #BoycottHawaii hashtag trending on Twitter. But progressives, rights defenders, and immigration advocates immediately flooded the hashtag with support for the island state--and promises to book a vacation:
While defenders of human rights are celebrating, they are also preparing for the long legal battle against the Muslim ban to continue.
The Hawaii decision is "a preliminary decision, but it recognizes that there continue to be problems with the constitutionality of this revised order, particularly with discriminatory intent toward Muslims," Betsy Fisher, policy director at the International Refugee Assistance Project at the Urban Justice Center, told the Times.
Trump was furious about the decision, promising the crowd in Nashville on Wednesday that "[w]e're going to take our case as far as it needs to go, including all the way up to the Supreme Court."
That fight, however, might not be a pleasant one for Trump and his allies, the Times points out: "[T]he legal debate is likely to be a protracted and unusually personal fight for the administration, touching Mr. Trump and a number of his key aides directly and raising the prospect that their public comments and private communications will be scrutinized."
Rights advocates are also reminding supporters that the battle against the Trump administration's right-wing xenophobia has only begun.
"This isn't the end of the fight," wrote the ACLU Action Team in a statement. "Trump's administration has made clear that they will continue to target and discriminate against Muslims, refugees, immigrants, and other vulnerable individuals and communities. Ramping up ICE [Immigration and Customs Enforcement] raids and border patrol, and promises to build a wall, are tactics to sanction a culture of fear, hate, and violence."
And so to help immigrants and refugees who may face anti-Muslim discrimination in airports and at the U.S. border, the ACLU is distributing "Know Your Rights" information in multiple languages. "Knowing them is crucial, now more than ever," the ACLU Action Team said.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.