

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Essentially codifying hate speech, Kentucky Governor Mike Bevin signed into law on Monday a bill that gives individuals, including students, license to make hateful statements about someone based on their "religious or political viewpoints."
Passed under the guise of bolstering "religious freedom in public schools," SB17 claims to "protect rights of individual students to express their religious views without fear of punishment," as the conservative Liberty Counsel wrote in a statement hailing the move.
But, in reality, the law "protects students who espouse homophobic religious viewpoints in school," as UK-based LGBTQ website Pink News put it on Monday. Further, it "is overtly designed to allow the use of the Bible in classrooms as an educational text--such as in literature or history courses," noted Salon columnist Nico Lang.
What's more, the law undermines the inclusive "all comers" policies at public colleges, universities, and high schools, which prevent student organizations receiving financial and other support from the institution from discriminating against students based on race, sex, religion, sexual orientation, or gender identity. That policy was upheld by the 2010 Supreme Court decision Christian Legal Society v. Martinez.
"Gov. Bevin's shameful decision to sign this discriminatory bill into law jeopardizes non-discrimination policies at public high schools, colleges, and universities," said Human Rights Council legal director Sarah Warbelow in a statement Monday. "No student should fear being excluded from a school club or participating in a school activity because they are LGBTQ. While of course private groups should have the freedom to express religious viewpoints, they should not be able to unfairly discriminate with taxpayer funds."
The bill was born out of conservative uproar over a Kentucky elementary school's decision to cut a Bible verse from its 2015 production of "A Charlie Brown's Christmas."
As Lang wrote last week:
The following year, legislation often referred to locally as the "Charlie Brown bill" was first was introduced to the General Assembly. In pushing the legislation, Kentucky state Senator Albert Robinson warned that action is necessary to prevent God-fearing Christians in the Bluegrass State from being discriminated against. During a discussion of the bill, he claimed that followers of Jesus Christ "have been persecuted." About the controversy over the "Charlie Brown" play, Robinson added that Christians would have been "prosecuted if we didn't keep our mouths shut."
Robinson further claimed that while Christians are silenced, the free speech rights of Muslims are protected. Muslims "can freely express" their beliefs, he said. "They have that Constitutional right."
Bottom line, as Jenny Pizer, the law and policy director for Lambda Legal, explained to Lang, SB17 was a "pro-discrimination bill being presented as an anti-discrimination bill."
It was "designed to facilitate discrimination against LGBT people," Pizer added.
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. US voters have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. If you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
Essentially codifying hate speech, Kentucky Governor Mike Bevin signed into law on Monday a bill that gives individuals, including students, license to make hateful statements about someone based on their "religious or political viewpoints."
Passed under the guise of bolstering "religious freedom in public schools," SB17 claims to "protect rights of individual students to express their religious views without fear of punishment," as the conservative Liberty Counsel wrote in a statement hailing the move.
But, in reality, the law "protects students who espouse homophobic religious viewpoints in school," as UK-based LGBTQ website Pink News put it on Monday. Further, it "is overtly designed to allow the use of the Bible in classrooms as an educational text--such as in literature or history courses," noted Salon columnist Nico Lang.
What's more, the law undermines the inclusive "all comers" policies at public colleges, universities, and high schools, which prevent student organizations receiving financial and other support from the institution from discriminating against students based on race, sex, religion, sexual orientation, or gender identity. That policy was upheld by the 2010 Supreme Court decision Christian Legal Society v. Martinez.
"Gov. Bevin's shameful decision to sign this discriminatory bill into law jeopardizes non-discrimination policies at public high schools, colleges, and universities," said Human Rights Council legal director Sarah Warbelow in a statement Monday. "No student should fear being excluded from a school club or participating in a school activity because they are LGBTQ. While of course private groups should have the freedom to express religious viewpoints, they should not be able to unfairly discriminate with taxpayer funds."
The bill was born out of conservative uproar over a Kentucky elementary school's decision to cut a Bible verse from its 2015 production of "A Charlie Brown's Christmas."
As Lang wrote last week:
The following year, legislation often referred to locally as the "Charlie Brown bill" was first was introduced to the General Assembly. In pushing the legislation, Kentucky state Senator Albert Robinson warned that action is necessary to prevent God-fearing Christians in the Bluegrass State from being discriminated against. During a discussion of the bill, he claimed that followers of Jesus Christ "have been persecuted." About the controversy over the "Charlie Brown" play, Robinson added that Christians would have been "prosecuted if we didn't keep our mouths shut."
Robinson further claimed that while Christians are silenced, the free speech rights of Muslims are protected. Muslims "can freely express" their beliefs, he said. "They have that Constitutional right."
Bottom line, as Jenny Pizer, the law and policy director for Lambda Legal, explained to Lang, SB17 was a "pro-discrimination bill being presented as an anti-discrimination bill."
It was "designed to facilitate discrimination against LGBT people," Pizer added.
Essentially codifying hate speech, Kentucky Governor Mike Bevin signed into law on Monday a bill that gives individuals, including students, license to make hateful statements about someone based on their "religious or political viewpoints."
Passed under the guise of bolstering "religious freedom in public schools," SB17 claims to "protect rights of individual students to express their religious views without fear of punishment," as the conservative Liberty Counsel wrote in a statement hailing the move.
But, in reality, the law "protects students who espouse homophobic religious viewpoints in school," as UK-based LGBTQ website Pink News put it on Monday. Further, it "is overtly designed to allow the use of the Bible in classrooms as an educational text--such as in literature or history courses," noted Salon columnist Nico Lang.
What's more, the law undermines the inclusive "all comers" policies at public colleges, universities, and high schools, which prevent student organizations receiving financial and other support from the institution from discriminating against students based on race, sex, religion, sexual orientation, or gender identity. That policy was upheld by the 2010 Supreme Court decision Christian Legal Society v. Martinez.
"Gov. Bevin's shameful decision to sign this discriminatory bill into law jeopardizes non-discrimination policies at public high schools, colleges, and universities," said Human Rights Council legal director Sarah Warbelow in a statement Monday. "No student should fear being excluded from a school club or participating in a school activity because they are LGBTQ. While of course private groups should have the freedom to express religious viewpoints, they should not be able to unfairly discriminate with taxpayer funds."
The bill was born out of conservative uproar over a Kentucky elementary school's decision to cut a Bible verse from its 2015 production of "A Charlie Brown's Christmas."
As Lang wrote last week:
The following year, legislation often referred to locally as the "Charlie Brown bill" was first was introduced to the General Assembly. In pushing the legislation, Kentucky state Senator Albert Robinson warned that action is necessary to prevent God-fearing Christians in the Bluegrass State from being discriminated against. During a discussion of the bill, he claimed that followers of Jesus Christ "have been persecuted." About the controversy over the "Charlie Brown" play, Robinson added that Christians would have been "prosecuted if we didn't keep our mouths shut."
Robinson further claimed that while Christians are silenced, the free speech rights of Muslims are protected. Muslims "can freely express" their beliefs, he said. "They have that Constitutional right."
Bottom line, as Jenny Pizer, the law and policy director for Lambda Legal, explained to Lang, SB17 was a "pro-discrimination bill being presented as an anti-discrimination bill."
It was "designed to facilitate discrimination against LGBT people," Pizer added.