

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Watchdog groups are suing the Trump administration (again), this time for failure to disclose records of visitors to the White House and to President Donald Trump at his Mar-a-Lago and Trump Tower residences.
The lawsuit, filed Monday in New York federal court by Citizens for Ethics and Responsibility in Washington (CREW), the non-profit National Security Archive, and
the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University, charges that the Secret Service--which maintains White House visitor logs--has refused to turn them over in response to Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests. The Department of Homeland Security, which oversees the Secret Service, is named as defendant (pdf) in the suit.
In response to CREW lawsuits, the Obama administration in 2009 agreed to release White House visitor logs every three to four months, with limited exceptions. According to CREW, those logs contained the names of each White House visitor, the dates of their visits, and who requested they be cleared for entry. "Americans have a right to know whose voices are being heard in the policymaking process," then-President Barack Obama said in announcing the policy.
But the current White House "has refused to say whether it will continue to provide public access to White House visitor logs," Monday's lawsuit reads--even despite letters, sent last month from eight U.S. senators to Trump and to U.S. Secret Service deputy director William J. Callahan, seeking a continuation of the Obama-era policy.
"It would be a significant setback to efforts to give the public insight into who influences the White House if this policy were to be discontinued or limited," the letter to Callahan read. "Indeed, given the unique aspects of how President Trump has decided to conduct official business, we believe he needs to do even more just to meet the benchmark of transparency set by President Obama."
Neither Callahan nor the White House has responded to the letters.
Also last month, Democrats in both the House and Senate introduced legislation aimed at compelling the president to release visitor logs for Trump-owned properties where he conducts official government business.
At that point, Trump had spent more than half the weekends since his inauguration at Mar-a-Lago, the resort estate he owns in Florida that his administration has frequently referred to as the "Winter White House." According to the New York Times, as of Monday he'd spent 21 days of his presidency at Mar-a-Lago; this past Saturday, he reportedly "had a friendly chat" there with conservative mega-donors David and Bill Koch. The chat was confirmed by a spokesman for Koch Industries but not by the White House.
"This is a case about the public's right to know who wields influence over the most powerful office in our government," said Alex Abdo of the Knight Institute on Monday. "In our view, the Freedom of Information Act requires the government to make this information available to the public."
Added CREW executive director Noah Bookbinder: "We hoped that the Trump administration would follow the precedent of the Obama administration and continue to release visitor logs, but unfortunately they have not. Given the many issues we have already seen in this White House with conflicts of interest, outside influence, and potential ethics violations, transparency is more important than ever, so we had no choice but to sue."
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Watchdog groups are suing the Trump administration (again), this time for failure to disclose records of visitors to the White House and to President Donald Trump at his Mar-a-Lago and Trump Tower residences.
The lawsuit, filed Monday in New York federal court by Citizens for Ethics and Responsibility in Washington (CREW), the non-profit National Security Archive, and
the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University, charges that the Secret Service--which maintains White House visitor logs--has refused to turn them over in response to Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests. The Department of Homeland Security, which oversees the Secret Service, is named as defendant (pdf) in the suit.
In response to CREW lawsuits, the Obama administration in 2009 agreed to release White House visitor logs every three to four months, with limited exceptions. According to CREW, those logs contained the names of each White House visitor, the dates of their visits, and who requested they be cleared for entry. "Americans have a right to know whose voices are being heard in the policymaking process," then-President Barack Obama said in announcing the policy.
But the current White House "has refused to say whether it will continue to provide public access to White House visitor logs," Monday's lawsuit reads--even despite letters, sent last month from eight U.S. senators to Trump and to U.S. Secret Service deputy director William J. Callahan, seeking a continuation of the Obama-era policy.
"It would be a significant setback to efforts to give the public insight into who influences the White House if this policy were to be discontinued or limited," the letter to Callahan read. "Indeed, given the unique aspects of how President Trump has decided to conduct official business, we believe he needs to do even more just to meet the benchmark of transparency set by President Obama."
Neither Callahan nor the White House has responded to the letters.
Also last month, Democrats in both the House and Senate introduced legislation aimed at compelling the president to release visitor logs for Trump-owned properties where he conducts official government business.
At that point, Trump had spent more than half the weekends since his inauguration at Mar-a-Lago, the resort estate he owns in Florida that his administration has frequently referred to as the "Winter White House." According to the New York Times, as of Monday he'd spent 21 days of his presidency at Mar-a-Lago; this past Saturday, he reportedly "had a friendly chat" there with conservative mega-donors David and Bill Koch. The chat was confirmed by a spokesman for Koch Industries but not by the White House.
"This is a case about the public's right to know who wields influence over the most powerful office in our government," said Alex Abdo of the Knight Institute on Monday. "In our view, the Freedom of Information Act requires the government to make this information available to the public."
Added CREW executive director Noah Bookbinder: "We hoped that the Trump administration would follow the precedent of the Obama administration and continue to release visitor logs, but unfortunately they have not. Given the many issues we have already seen in this White House with conflicts of interest, outside influence, and potential ethics violations, transparency is more important than ever, so we had no choice but to sue."
Watchdog groups are suing the Trump administration (again), this time for failure to disclose records of visitors to the White House and to President Donald Trump at his Mar-a-Lago and Trump Tower residences.
The lawsuit, filed Monday in New York federal court by Citizens for Ethics and Responsibility in Washington (CREW), the non-profit National Security Archive, and
the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University, charges that the Secret Service--which maintains White House visitor logs--has refused to turn them over in response to Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests. The Department of Homeland Security, which oversees the Secret Service, is named as defendant (pdf) in the suit.
In response to CREW lawsuits, the Obama administration in 2009 agreed to release White House visitor logs every three to four months, with limited exceptions. According to CREW, those logs contained the names of each White House visitor, the dates of their visits, and who requested they be cleared for entry. "Americans have a right to know whose voices are being heard in the policymaking process," then-President Barack Obama said in announcing the policy.
But the current White House "has refused to say whether it will continue to provide public access to White House visitor logs," Monday's lawsuit reads--even despite letters, sent last month from eight U.S. senators to Trump and to U.S. Secret Service deputy director William J. Callahan, seeking a continuation of the Obama-era policy.
"It would be a significant setback to efforts to give the public insight into who influences the White House if this policy were to be discontinued or limited," the letter to Callahan read. "Indeed, given the unique aspects of how President Trump has decided to conduct official business, we believe he needs to do even more just to meet the benchmark of transparency set by President Obama."
Neither Callahan nor the White House has responded to the letters.
Also last month, Democrats in both the House and Senate introduced legislation aimed at compelling the president to release visitor logs for Trump-owned properties where he conducts official government business.
At that point, Trump had spent more than half the weekends since his inauguration at Mar-a-Lago, the resort estate he owns in Florida that his administration has frequently referred to as the "Winter White House." According to the New York Times, as of Monday he'd spent 21 days of his presidency at Mar-a-Lago; this past Saturday, he reportedly "had a friendly chat" there with conservative mega-donors David and Bill Koch. The chat was confirmed by a spokesman for Koch Industries but not by the White House.
"This is a case about the public's right to know who wields influence over the most powerful office in our government," said Alex Abdo of the Knight Institute on Monday. "In our view, the Freedom of Information Act requires the government to make this information available to the public."
Added CREW executive director Noah Bookbinder: "We hoped that the Trump administration would follow the precedent of the Obama administration and continue to release visitor logs, but unfortunately they have not. Given the many issues we have already seen in this White House with conflicts of interest, outside influence, and potential ethics violations, transparency is more important than ever, so we had no choice but to sue."