Rep. Rod Blum (R-Iowa) abruptly ended an interview with a local TV station on Monday afternoon. (Screenshot)
May 09, 2017
Monday was not a good day for Iowa Congressman Rod Blum, a Freedom Caucus Republican whose vote-flipping last week allowed the cruel American Healthcare Act, or Trumpcare, to pass the U.S. House.
First, he stormed out of a pre-orchestrated television interview with local station KCRG-TV9, after a reporter Josh Scheinblum pressed him on why his staff was requiring IDs from those hoping to attend a town hall forum in Dubuque Monday night.
"Some would make the case that you represent all Iowans...shouldn't all Iowans have a voice at the table or at least have the option to?" Scheinblum asked after Blum explained he wanted to ensure that all town hall attendees lived in the district he represents.
"I don't represent all Iowans" Blum answered. "I represent the First District of Iowa. That would be like saying, 'Shouldn't I be able to, even though I live in Dubuque, be able to go vote in Iowa City during the election because I'd like to vote in that district instead?'"
Scheinblum followed up: "Would you still take donations from a Republican in Iowa City?"
At which point Blum stood up, removed his microphone, and said "I'm done. This is ridiculous. He's just going to sit there and badger me." As he was walking out the door, the children whose presence Blum had requested at the interview looked confused.
Watch below:
Blum's problems didn't end there.
Following the truncated interview, the congressman faced roughly 1,000 voters at a town hall at Dubuque Senior High School, "where most of the prescreened audience screamed at him," according to the Washington Post.
The local Waterloo Cedar Falls Courier wrote that "[t]he two-term incumbent faced regular interruptions from shouted questions, stomping feet, and boos when delivering answers in support" of Trumpcare, which he voted against in its first incarnation, but came around to support last week after provisions were inserted to make it easier for insurance companies to increase prices for pre-existing conditions and more.
The Huffington Postreported:
One woman stood up and decried the process in which Republicans passed the bill--including their decision to not wait for the Congressional Budget Office to analyze its cost and coverage projections. She also claimed Blum's staff told her the congressman had not read the bill.
"You voted for this bill in a rush. There were no committee hearings. This is my life," she said. "The Congressional Budget Office didn't score this bill... what was the rush?"
"I have always said the process was bad," Blum responded. "It was rushed. There should have been hearings."
"The bill is better than what we have [under the Affordable Care Act]. It's heading in the right direction," he added, to boos from the audience.
Politico reporter Dan Diamond captured several moments on Twitter:
\u201cQ: What if $ for preexisting conditions run out?\n\nBlum: Congress will replenish it but I can\u2019t promise it. \u201cI probably won\u2019t be there then.\u201d https://t.co/97FObdgVpP\u201d— Dan Diamond (@Dan Diamond) 1494288757
Of course, in holding a hometown forum in the first place, Blum is doing better than the vast majority of the 217 House Republicans who voted in favor of Trumpcare. According to a Politico review of TownHallProject.com, only 14 of those 217 members--less than 7 percent--are listed as holding town halls with their constituents this week.
After seeing how Blum fared on Monday, that number isn't likely to increase.
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Deirdre Fulton
Deirdre Fulton is a former Common Dreams senior editor and staff writer. Previously she worked as an editor and writer for the Portland Phoenix and the Boston Phoenix, where she was honored by the New England Press Association and the Association of Alternative Newsweeklies. A Boston University graduate, Deirdre is a co-founder of the Maine-based Lorem Ipsum Theater Collective and the PortFringe theater festival. She writes young adult fiction in her spare time.
Monday was not a good day for Iowa Congressman Rod Blum, a Freedom Caucus Republican whose vote-flipping last week allowed the cruel American Healthcare Act, or Trumpcare, to pass the U.S. House.
First, he stormed out of a pre-orchestrated television interview with local station KCRG-TV9, after a reporter Josh Scheinblum pressed him on why his staff was requiring IDs from those hoping to attend a town hall forum in Dubuque Monday night.
"Some would make the case that you represent all Iowans...shouldn't all Iowans have a voice at the table or at least have the option to?" Scheinblum asked after Blum explained he wanted to ensure that all town hall attendees lived in the district he represents.
"I don't represent all Iowans" Blum answered. "I represent the First District of Iowa. That would be like saying, 'Shouldn't I be able to, even though I live in Dubuque, be able to go vote in Iowa City during the election because I'd like to vote in that district instead?'"
Scheinblum followed up: "Would you still take donations from a Republican in Iowa City?"
At which point Blum stood up, removed his microphone, and said "I'm done. This is ridiculous. He's just going to sit there and badger me." As he was walking out the door, the children whose presence Blum had requested at the interview looked confused.
Watch below:
Blum's problems didn't end there.
Following the truncated interview, the congressman faced roughly 1,000 voters at a town hall at Dubuque Senior High School, "where most of the prescreened audience screamed at him," according to the Washington Post.
The local Waterloo Cedar Falls Courier wrote that "[t]he two-term incumbent faced regular interruptions from shouted questions, stomping feet, and boos when delivering answers in support" of Trumpcare, which he voted against in its first incarnation, but came around to support last week after provisions were inserted to make it easier for insurance companies to increase prices for pre-existing conditions and more.
The Huffington Postreported:
One woman stood up and decried the process in which Republicans passed the bill--including their decision to not wait for the Congressional Budget Office to analyze its cost and coverage projections. She also claimed Blum's staff told her the congressman had not read the bill.
"You voted for this bill in a rush. There were no committee hearings. This is my life," she said. "The Congressional Budget Office didn't score this bill... what was the rush?"
"I have always said the process was bad," Blum responded. "It was rushed. There should have been hearings."
"The bill is better than what we have [under the Affordable Care Act]. It's heading in the right direction," he added, to boos from the audience.
Politico reporter Dan Diamond captured several moments on Twitter:
\u201cQ: What if $ for preexisting conditions run out?\n\nBlum: Congress will replenish it but I can\u2019t promise it. \u201cI probably won\u2019t be there then.\u201d https://t.co/97FObdgVpP\u201d— Dan Diamond (@Dan Diamond) 1494288757
Of course, in holding a hometown forum in the first place, Blum is doing better than the vast majority of the 217 House Republicans who voted in favor of Trumpcare. According to a Politico review of TownHallProject.com, only 14 of those 217 members--less than 7 percent--are listed as holding town halls with their constituents this week.
After seeing how Blum fared on Monday, that number isn't likely to increase.
Deirdre Fulton
Deirdre Fulton is a former Common Dreams senior editor and staff writer. Previously she worked as an editor and writer for the Portland Phoenix and the Boston Phoenix, where she was honored by the New England Press Association and the Association of Alternative Newsweeklies. A Boston University graduate, Deirdre is a co-founder of the Maine-based Lorem Ipsum Theater Collective and the PortFringe theater festival. She writes young adult fiction in her spare time.
Monday was not a good day for Iowa Congressman Rod Blum, a Freedom Caucus Republican whose vote-flipping last week allowed the cruel American Healthcare Act, or Trumpcare, to pass the U.S. House.
First, he stormed out of a pre-orchestrated television interview with local station KCRG-TV9, after a reporter Josh Scheinblum pressed him on why his staff was requiring IDs from those hoping to attend a town hall forum in Dubuque Monday night.
"Some would make the case that you represent all Iowans...shouldn't all Iowans have a voice at the table or at least have the option to?" Scheinblum asked after Blum explained he wanted to ensure that all town hall attendees lived in the district he represents.
"I don't represent all Iowans" Blum answered. "I represent the First District of Iowa. That would be like saying, 'Shouldn't I be able to, even though I live in Dubuque, be able to go vote in Iowa City during the election because I'd like to vote in that district instead?'"
Scheinblum followed up: "Would you still take donations from a Republican in Iowa City?"
At which point Blum stood up, removed his microphone, and said "I'm done. This is ridiculous. He's just going to sit there and badger me." As he was walking out the door, the children whose presence Blum had requested at the interview looked confused.
Watch below:
Blum's problems didn't end there.
Following the truncated interview, the congressman faced roughly 1,000 voters at a town hall at Dubuque Senior High School, "where most of the prescreened audience screamed at him," according to the Washington Post.
The local Waterloo Cedar Falls Courier wrote that "[t]he two-term incumbent faced regular interruptions from shouted questions, stomping feet, and boos when delivering answers in support" of Trumpcare, which he voted against in its first incarnation, but came around to support last week after provisions were inserted to make it easier for insurance companies to increase prices for pre-existing conditions and more.
The Huffington Postreported:
One woman stood up and decried the process in which Republicans passed the bill--including their decision to not wait for the Congressional Budget Office to analyze its cost and coverage projections. She also claimed Blum's staff told her the congressman had not read the bill.
"You voted for this bill in a rush. There were no committee hearings. This is my life," she said. "The Congressional Budget Office didn't score this bill... what was the rush?"
"I have always said the process was bad," Blum responded. "It was rushed. There should have been hearings."
"The bill is better than what we have [under the Affordable Care Act]. It's heading in the right direction," he added, to boos from the audience.
Politico reporter Dan Diamond captured several moments on Twitter:
\u201cQ: What if $ for preexisting conditions run out?\n\nBlum: Congress will replenish it but I can\u2019t promise it. \u201cI probably won\u2019t be there then.\u201d https://t.co/97FObdgVpP\u201d— Dan Diamond (@Dan Diamond) 1494288757
Of course, in holding a hometown forum in the first place, Blum is doing better than the vast majority of the 217 House Republicans who voted in favor of Trumpcare. According to a Politico review of TownHallProject.com, only 14 of those 217 members--less than 7 percent--are listed as holding town halls with their constituents this week.
After seeing how Blum fared on Monday, that number isn't likely to increase.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.