To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.

×
SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER

Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

* indicates required
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Blue Apron? 'Um, No.' Anti-Hunger Advocates Decry Trump's Food Box Proposal for Nation's Poor

A girl pays for her mother's groceries using Electronic Benefits Transfer (EBT) tokens, more commonly known as food stamps, at a farmers' market in New York City. (Photo: Andrew Burton/Getty Images

Blue Apron? 'Um, No.' Anti-Hunger Advocates Decry Trump's Food Box Proposal for Nation's Poor

The USDA is attempting to promote its plan to assign specific shelf-stable foods to families who rely on food stamps as "America's Harvest Box"—although the proposed food boxes will contain no fresh foods

Amid the outcry over President Donald Trump's proposed 2019 budget--which also calls for massive spending cuts for education, healthcare, and foreign aid--policy experts and anti-hunger groups zeroed in on Tuesday on the administration's plan to replace food stamps with boxes that would contain foods pre-selected by the Agriculture Department.

Mick Mulvaney, director of the Office of Management and Budget, likened the proposal to Blue Apron, the popular meal-delivery service. But critics noted that the company's mission of simplifying meal preparation for busy households would be replaced by a bureaucratic attempt to dictate which foods families could have, in the interest of saving money for the government.

"With Blue Apron, you get to pick your meals and decide when they come," noted journalist Bryce Covert. "And it gives you all the ingredients you need to complete it. Under Trump's plan, the government decides what you get and when you get it. You have no say. Is your oven off because you couldn't pay the gas bill? Too bad, you got canned food that needs to be heated up."

Under Trump's proposal, families receiving more than $90 in Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits--about 80 percent of eligible families--would receive half of their benefits in the monthly food boxes, which would contain shelf-stable milk, juice, grains, cereals, pasta, peanut butter, beans and canned meat, fruits and vegetables. After receiving the box, the average SNAP household would be left with about $127 per month to buy fresh produce and other foods of their choosing.

Anti-hunger advocates point out that the pre-selected foods would not be suitable for SNAP recipients with special dietary needs.

"It boggles the mind how that would play out," Kathy Fisher, policy director at Philadelphia's Coalition Against Hunger, told the Washington Post. "We know SNAP works now, when people can choose what they need. How they would distribute foods to people with specialized diets, or [to people in] rural areas...It's very expensive and very complicated."

Others pointed out that the USDA's proposed name for the packages, "America's Harvest Box," is a misnomer.

"This action would not only destabilize attempts to bring more healthy, fresh foods into the homes of America's food insecure, but would keep dollars out of local grocery stores and farmers markets, which are critical assets to all communities," Jordan Rasmussen, a policy associate at the Center for Rural Affairs, toldPolitico.

Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
budgetfoodhungerpovertytrumpismusda

Amid the outcry over President Donald Trump's proposed 2019 budget--which also calls for massive spending cuts for education, healthcare, and foreign aid--policy experts and anti-hunger groups zeroed in on Tuesday on the administration's plan to replace food stamps with boxes that would contain foods pre-selected by the Agriculture Department.

Mick Mulvaney, director of the Office of Management and Budget, likened the proposal to Blue Apron, the popular meal-delivery service. But critics noted that the company's mission of simplifying meal preparation for busy households would be replaced by a bureaucratic attempt to dictate which foods families could have, in the interest of saving money for the government.

"With Blue Apron, you get to pick your meals and decide when they come," noted journalist Bryce Covert. "And it gives you all the ingredients you need to complete it. Under Trump's plan, the government decides what you get and when you get it. You have no say. Is your oven off because you couldn't pay the gas bill? Too bad, you got canned food that needs to be heated up."

Under Trump's proposal, families receiving more than $90 in Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits--about 80 percent of eligible families--would receive half of their benefits in the monthly food boxes, which would contain shelf-stable milk, juice, grains, cereals, pasta, peanut butter, beans and canned meat, fruits and vegetables. After receiving the box, the average SNAP household would be left with about $127 per month to buy fresh produce and other foods of their choosing.

Anti-hunger advocates point out that the pre-selected foods would not be suitable for SNAP recipients with special dietary needs.

"It boggles the mind how that would play out," Kathy Fisher, policy director at Philadelphia's Coalition Against Hunger, told the Washington Post. "We know SNAP works now, when people can choose what they need. How they would distribute foods to people with specialized diets, or [to people in] rural areas...It's very expensive and very complicated."

Others pointed out that the USDA's proposed name for the packages, "America's Harvest Box," is a misnomer.

"This action would not only destabilize attempts to bring more healthy, fresh foods into the homes of America's food insecure, but would keep dollars out of local grocery stores and farmers markets, which are critical assets to all communities," Jordan Rasmussen, a policy associate at the Center for Rural Affairs, toldPolitico.

Amid the outcry over President Donald Trump's proposed 2019 budget--which also calls for massive spending cuts for education, healthcare, and foreign aid--policy experts and anti-hunger groups zeroed in on Tuesday on the administration's plan to replace food stamps with boxes that would contain foods pre-selected by the Agriculture Department.

Mick Mulvaney, director of the Office of Management and Budget, likened the proposal to Blue Apron, the popular meal-delivery service. But critics noted that the company's mission of simplifying meal preparation for busy households would be replaced by a bureaucratic attempt to dictate which foods families could have, in the interest of saving money for the government.

"With Blue Apron, you get to pick your meals and decide when they come," noted journalist Bryce Covert. "And it gives you all the ingredients you need to complete it. Under Trump's plan, the government decides what you get and when you get it. You have no say. Is your oven off because you couldn't pay the gas bill? Too bad, you got canned food that needs to be heated up."

Under Trump's proposal, families receiving more than $90 in Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits--about 80 percent of eligible families--would receive half of their benefits in the monthly food boxes, which would contain shelf-stable milk, juice, grains, cereals, pasta, peanut butter, beans and canned meat, fruits and vegetables. After receiving the box, the average SNAP household would be left with about $127 per month to buy fresh produce and other foods of their choosing.

Anti-hunger advocates point out that the pre-selected foods would not be suitable for SNAP recipients with special dietary needs.

"It boggles the mind how that would play out," Kathy Fisher, policy director at Philadelphia's Coalition Against Hunger, told the Washington Post. "We know SNAP works now, when people can choose what they need. How they would distribute foods to people with specialized diets, or [to people in] rural areas...It's very expensive and very complicated."

Others pointed out that the USDA's proposed name for the packages, "America's Harvest Box," is a misnomer.

"This action would not only destabilize attempts to bring more healthy, fresh foods into the homes of America's food insecure, but would keep dollars out of local grocery stores and farmers markets, which are critical assets to all communities," Jordan Rasmussen, a policy associate at the Center for Rural Affairs, toldPolitico.

budgetfoodhungerpovertytrumpismusda
Join the Conversation