SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Calling the White House's version of events further into question, FBI Director Christopher Wray on Tuesday appeared to contradict the timeline put forth by the administration regarding domestic abuse allegations against Trump's staff secretary Rob Porter, who resigned last week.
At a Senate Intelligence Committee hearing, Wray told lawmakers that the FBI's background investigation into Porter--standard for White House employees--had been initially completed last July and that follow-up information requested by the administration was provided in November. According to Wray, the investigation was closed in January, though subsequent information was again provided earlier this month.
\u201cFBI Director Wray on Rob Porter background check:\n\n\u2022 Submitted partial report in March\n\u2022 Completed background investigation in late July \n\u2022 Received request for follow up, provided info in Nov. \n\u2022 Closed the file in Jan. \n\u2022 Received and passed on new info earlier this month\u201d— NBC News (@NBC News) 1518537811
The FBI had briefed the White House on the investigation, which uncovered the allegations that Porter's two ex-wives made against him, four times by the time the Daily Mail publicized the accusations of abuse on February 6.
Wray's version of events ran counter to the White House's repeated statements that the background investigation was still ongoing when the story was published, and Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders' claim on Monday that the White House "learned of this situation involving Rob Porter last Tuesday evening."
In a press briefing after Wray gave his testimony, Huckabee Sanders told reporters that while the FBI had completed its investigation of Porter, the White House Personnel Security Office had not yet made a recommendation on how to proceed when the story broke.
\u201cSo on day 7 of the Porter scandal, the WH has now found a new scapegoat: the White House Personnel Security Office.\u201d— Emily C. Singer (@Emily C. Singer) 1518552624
The press conference marked the first time the Personnel Security Office had been mentioned by the White House since the allegations surfaced.
Following the Daily Mail's report last week, Huckabee Sanders and Kelly both spoke highly of Porter's integrity and character, only to call the abuse allegations "shocking" the following day, after the newspaper published photos of Porter's ex-wife's bruised face.
Kelly said last Friday that he fired Porter directly after seeing the photos, contradicting the White House's earlier statement that the staff secretary had resigned. Hours before Huckabee Sanders told the press that the senior staff had been waiting for a recommendation on Porter from the Personnel Security Office, Kelly told the Wall Street Journal that the White House's handling of the Porter controversy "was all done right."
While Wray's testimony and Huckabee Sanders' response left the political press with more questions about the White House's version of events, Trump critics said the FBI director's story was cause for the chief of staff to step aside.
\u201cOne reason @FBI has a rigorous security clearance investigation is to prevent people who could be blackmailed from accessing classified info. \n\nRob Porter was susceptible to blackmail. White House knew about this since last March/July and did nothing. John Kelly needs to resign. https://t.co/avVNCadtTL\u201d— Ted Lieu (@Ted Lieu) 1518542495
\u201c"Absolutely, I do," Sen. Martin Heinrich said just now when asked if White House Chief of Staff John Kelly should resign over the Rob Porter situation.\u201d— Emma Loop (@Emma Loop) 1518550484
\u201cWhite House is actively lying\u2014are we surprised?\u2014re what they knew about Rob Porter\u2019s abusive background. FBI did its job & gave WH the info. John Kelly chose to ignore it & keep an alleged domestic abuser in top position. Disgusting. Women are watching. https://t.co/L4ysH5Qg1z\u201d— Rep. Pramila Jayapal (@Rep. Pramila Jayapal) 1518549423
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Calling the White House's version of events further into question, FBI Director Christopher Wray on Tuesday appeared to contradict the timeline put forth by the administration regarding domestic abuse allegations against Trump's staff secretary Rob Porter, who resigned last week.
At a Senate Intelligence Committee hearing, Wray told lawmakers that the FBI's background investigation into Porter--standard for White House employees--had been initially completed last July and that follow-up information requested by the administration was provided in November. According to Wray, the investigation was closed in January, though subsequent information was again provided earlier this month.
\u201cFBI Director Wray on Rob Porter background check:\n\n\u2022 Submitted partial report in March\n\u2022 Completed background investigation in late July \n\u2022 Received request for follow up, provided info in Nov. \n\u2022 Closed the file in Jan. \n\u2022 Received and passed on new info earlier this month\u201d— NBC News (@NBC News) 1518537811
The FBI had briefed the White House on the investigation, which uncovered the allegations that Porter's two ex-wives made against him, four times by the time the Daily Mail publicized the accusations of abuse on February 6.
Wray's version of events ran counter to the White House's repeated statements that the background investigation was still ongoing when the story was published, and Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders' claim on Monday that the White House "learned of this situation involving Rob Porter last Tuesday evening."
In a press briefing after Wray gave his testimony, Huckabee Sanders told reporters that while the FBI had completed its investigation of Porter, the White House Personnel Security Office had not yet made a recommendation on how to proceed when the story broke.
\u201cSo on day 7 of the Porter scandal, the WH has now found a new scapegoat: the White House Personnel Security Office.\u201d— Emily C. Singer (@Emily C. Singer) 1518552624
The press conference marked the first time the Personnel Security Office had been mentioned by the White House since the allegations surfaced.
Following the Daily Mail's report last week, Huckabee Sanders and Kelly both spoke highly of Porter's integrity and character, only to call the abuse allegations "shocking" the following day, after the newspaper published photos of Porter's ex-wife's bruised face.
Kelly said last Friday that he fired Porter directly after seeing the photos, contradicting the White House's earlier statement that the staff secretary had resigned. Hours before Huckabee Sanders told the press that the senior staff had been waiting for a recommendation on Porter from the Personnel Security Office, Kelly told the Wall Street Journal that the White House's handling of the Porter controversy "was all done right."
While Wray's testimony and Huckabee Sanders' response left the political press with more questions about the White House's version of events, Trump critics said the FBI director's story was cause for the chief of staff to step aside.
\u201cOne reason @FBI has a rigorous security clearance investigation is to prevent people who could be blackmailed from accessing classified info. \n\nRob Porter was susceptible to blackmail. White House knew about this since last March/July and did nothing. John Kelly needs to resign. https://t.co/avVNCadtTL\u201d— Ted Lieu (@Ted Lieu) 1518542495
\u201c"Absolutely, I do," Sen. Martin Heinrich said just now when asked if White House Chief of Staff John Kelly should resign over the Rob Porter situation.\u201d— Emma Loop (@Emma Loop) 1518550484
\u201cWhite House is actively lying\u2014are we surprised?\u2014re what they knew about Rob Porter\u2019s abusive background. FBI did its job & gave WH the info. John Kelly chose to ignore it & keep an alleged domestic abuser in top position. Disgusting. Women are watching. https://t.co/L4ysH5Qg1z\u201d— Rep. Pramila Jayapal (@Rep. Pramila Jayapal) 1518549423
Calling the White House's version of events further into question, FBI Director Christopher Wray on Tuesday appeared to contradict the timeline put forth by the administration regarding domestic abuse allegations against Trump's staff secretary Rob Porter, who resigned last week.
At a Senate Intelligence Committee hearing, Wray told lawmakers that the FBI's background investigation into Porter--standard for White House employees--had been initially completed last July and that follow-up information requested by the administration was provided in November. According to Wray, the investigation was closed in January, though subsequent information was again provided earlier this month.
\u201cFBI Director Wray on Rob Porter background check:\n\n\u2022 Submitted partial report in March\n\u2022 Completed background investigation in late July \n\u2022 Received request for follow up, provided info in Nov. \n\u2022 Closed the file in Jan. \n\u2022 Received and passed on new info earlier this month\u201d— NBC News (@NBC News) 1518537811
The FBI had briefed the White House on the investigation, which uncovered the allegations that Porter's two ex-wives made against him, four times by the time the Daily Mail publicized the accusations of abuse on February 6.
Wray's version of events ran counter to the White House's repeated statements that the background investigation was still ongoing when the story was published, and Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders' claim on Monday that the White House "learned of this situation involving Rob Porter last Tuesday evening."
In a press briefing after Wray gave his testimony, Huckabee Sanders told reporters that while the FBI had completed its investigation of Porter, the White House Personnel Security Office had not yet made a recommendation on how to proceed when the story broke.
\u201cSo on day 7 of the Porter scandal, the WH has now found a new scapegoat: the White House Personnel Security Office.\u201d— Emily C. Singer (@Emily C. Singer) 1518552624
The press conference marked the first time the Personnel Security Office had been mentioned by the White House since the allegations surfaced.
Following the Daily Mail's report last week, Huckabee Sanders and Kelly both spoke highly of Porter's integrity and character, only to call the abuse allegations "shocking" the following day, after the newspaper published photos of Porter's ex-wife's bruised face.
Kelly said last Friday that he fired Porter directly after seeing the photos, contradicting the White House's earlier statement that the staff secretary had resigned. Hours before Huckabee Sanders told the press that the senior staff had been waiting for a recommendation on Porter from the Personnel Security Office, Kelly told the Wall Street Journal that the White House's handling of the Porter controversy "was all done right."
While Wray's testimony and Huckabee Sanders' response left the political press with more questions about the White House's version of events, Trump critics said the FBI director's story was cause for the chief of staff to step aside.
\u201cOne reason @FBI has a rigorous security clearance investigation is to prevent people who could be blackmailed from accessing classified info. \n\nRob Porter was susceptible to blackmail. White House knew about this since last March/July and did nothing. John Kelly needs to resign. https://t.co/avVNCadtTL\u201d— Ted Lieu (@Ted Lieu) 1518542495
\u201c"Absolutely, I do," Sen. Martin Heinrich said just now when asked if White House Chief of Staff John Kelly should resign over the Rob Porter situation.\u201d— Emma Loop (@Emma Loop) 1518550484
\u201cWhite House is actively lying\u2014are we surprised?\u2014re what they knew about Rob Porter\u2019s abusive background. FBI did its job & gave WH the info. John Kelly chose to ignore it & keep an alleged domestic abuser in top position. Disgusting. Women are watching. https://t.co/L4ysH5Qg1z\u201d— Rep. Pramila Jayapal (@Rep. Pramila Jayapal) 1518549423