Gina Haspel speaks at the William J. Donovan Award Dinner, Oct. 2017. (Photo: The OSS Society/YouTube)
May 06, 2018
President Donald Trump's pick to lead the CIA, Gina Haspel, sought to withdraw her nomination on Friday amid concerns that details about her role in the agency's torture program would sink the possibility of a successful confirmation, the Washington Postreported Sunday.
\u201cSo Haspel wanted to step aside to avoid Wednesday\u2019s intense interrogation in the Senate, during which nobody will cover her face with cloth, turn her upside down and pour water until she thinks she\u2019s about to drown. \n\nShe will be allowed to sleep the night before and night after.\u201d— Ryan Grim (@Ryan Grim) 1525635900
The Post reported: "Haspel told the White House she was interested in stepping aside if it avoided the spectacle of a brutal confirmation hearing on Wednesday and potential damage to the CIA's reputation and her own, the officials said."
According to the Post, citing information from four senior U.S. officials, Hapsel indicated her position to the White House when she was summoned there for a meeting to discuss that history. She then headed back to her CIA office. Later on Friday, senior White House aides including legislative affairs head Marc Short and press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders engaged in discussions with her there lasting "several hours."
It was only Saturday when the White House learned she would be going through with the nomination.
"The takeaway for every United States Senator," commented Faiz Shakir, the ACLU's national political director, "should be that they need a lot more information about Haspel than they're currently getting."
Sanders doubled down on her promotion of Haspel, tweeting on Saturday that there is "no one more qualified" and that "Any Democrat who claims to support women's empowerment and our national security but opposes her nomination is a total hypocrite."
Rep. Ted Lieu (D-Calif.) quipped back: "Perhaps I missed it, but I don't see being complicit in torture as part of the agenda for either women's empowerment or our national security."
\u201cDear @PressSec: Perhaps I missed it, but I don't see being complicit in torture as part of the agenda for either women's empowerment or our national security. https://t.co/ssXidnnwpU\u201d— Ted Lieu (@Ted Lieu) 1525584198
The revelations come days after the ACLU filed a Freedom of Information Act demanding records related to "the new propaganda campaign that the CIA is now waging on behalf of Gina Haspel even as it hides her responsibility for torture and role in destruction of torture evidence."
Her confirmation hearing, set for May 9, was already expected to end with a close vote.
In the lead-up to the hearing, advocacy groups--who've said her confirmation would be a clear endorsement of torture--are sustaining their efforts to make sure senators block it.
\u201cThis week Gina Haspel, who has overseen torture facilities with waterboarding, will face a confirmation hearing to become the next director of the CIA. Tell the Senate Intelligence Committee not to confirm her! https://t.co/hEZGV0b1Vq\u201d— CODEPINK (@CODEPINK) 1525636803
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
President Donald Trump's pick to lead the CIA, Gina Haspel, sought to withdraw her nomination on Friday amid concerns that details about her role in the agency's torture program would sink the possibility of a successful confirmation, the Washington Postreported Sunday.
\u201cSo Haspel wanted to step aside to avoid Wednesday\u2019s intense interrogation in the Senate, during which nobody will cover her face with cloth, turn her upside down and pour water until she thinks she\u2019s about to drown. \n\nShe will be allowed to sleep the night before and night after.\u201d— Ryan Grim (@Ryan Grim) 1525635900
The Post reported: "Haspel told the White House she was interested in stepping aside if it avoided the spectacle of a brutal confirmation hearing on Wednesday and potential damage to the CIA's reputation and her own, the officials said."
According to the Post, citing information from four senior U.S. officials, Hapsel indicated her position to the White House when she was summoned there for a meeting to discuss that history. She then headed back to her CIA office. Later on Friday, senior White House aides including legislative affairs head Marc Short and press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders engaged in discussions with her there lasting "several hours."
It was only Saturday when the White House learned she would be going through with the nomination.
"The takeaway for every United States Senator," commented Faiz Shakir, the ACLU's national political director, "should be that they need a lot more information about Haspel than they're currently getting."
Sanders doubled down on her promotion of Haspel, tweeting on Saturday that there is "no one more qualified" and that "Any Democrat who claims to support women's empowerment and our national security but opposes her nomination is a total hypocrite."
Rep. Ted Lieu (D-Calif.) quipped back: "Perhaps I missed it, but I don't see being complicit in torture as part of the agenda for either women's empowerment or our national security."
\u201cDear @PressSec: Perhaps I missed it, but I don't see being complicit in torture as part of the agenda for either women's empowerment or our national security. https://t.co/ssXidnnwpU\u201d— Ted Lieu (@Ted Lieu) 1525584198
The revelations come days after the ACLU filed a Freedom of Information Act demanding records related to "the new propaganda campaign that the CIA is now waging on behalf of Gina Haspel even as it hides her responsibility for torture and role in destruction of torture evidence."
Her confirmation hearing, set for May 9, was already expected to end with a close vote.
In the lead-up to the hearing, advocacy groups--who've said her confirmation would be a clear endorsement of torture--are sustaining their efforts to make sure senators block it.
\u201cThis week Gina Haspel, who has overseen torture facilities with waterboarding, will face a confirmation hearing to become the next director of the CIA. Tell the Senate Intelligence Committee not to confirm her! https://t.co/hEZGV0b1Vq\u201d— CODEPINK (@CODEPINK) 1525636803
President Donald Trump's pick to lead the CIA, Gina Haspel, sought to withdraw her nomination on Friday amid concerns that details about her role in the agency's torture program would sink the possibility of a successful confirmation, the Washington Postreported Sunday.
\u201cSo Haspel wanted to step aside to avoid Wednesday\u2019s intense interrogation in the Senate, during which nobody will cover her face with cloth, turn her upside down and pour water until she thinks she\u2019s about to drown. \n\nShe will be allowed to sleep the night before and night after.\u201d— Ryan Grim (@Ryan Grim) 1525635900
The Post reported: "Haspel told the White House she was interested in stepping aside if it avoided the spectacle of a brutal confirmation hearing on Wednesday and potential damage to the CIA's reputation and her own, the officials said."
According to the Post, citing information from four senior U.S. officials, Hapsel indicated her position to the White House when she was summoned there for a meeting to discuss that history. She then headed back to her CIA office. Later on Friday, senior White House aides including legislative affairs head Marc Short and press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders engaged in discussions with her there lasting "several hours."
It was only Saturday when the White House learned she would be going through with the nomination.
"The takeaway for every United States Senator," commented Faiz Shakir, the ACLU's national political director, "should be that they need a lot more information about Haspel than they're currently getting."
Sanders doubled down on her promotion of Haspel, tweeting on Saturday that there is "no one more qualified" and that "Any Democrat who claims to support women's empowerment and our national security but opposes her nomination is a total hypocrite."
Rep. Ted Lieu (D-Calif.) quipped back: "Perhaps I missed it, but I don't see being complicit in torture as part of the agenda for either women's empowerment or our national security."
\u201cDear @PressSec: Perhaps I missed it, but I don't see being complicit in torture as part of the agenda for either women's empowerment or our national security. https://t.co/ssXidnnwpU\u201d— Ted Lieu (@Ted Lieu) 1525584198
The revelations come days after the ACLU filed a Freedom of Information Act demanding records related to "the new propaganda campaign that the CIA is now waging on behalf of Gina Haspel even as it hides her responsibility for torture and role in destruction of torture evidence."
Her confirmation hearing, set for May 9, was already expected to end with a close vote.
In the lead-up to the hearing, advocacy groups--who've said her confirmation would be a clear endorsement of torture--are sustaining their efforts to make sure senators block it.
\u201cThis week Gina Haspel, who has overseen torture facilities with waterboarding, will face a confirmation hearing to become the next director of the CIA. Tell the Senate Intelligence Committee not to confirm her! https://t.co/hEZGV0b1Vq\u201d— CODEPINK (@CODEPINK) 1525636803
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.