SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
A protester holds a sign at a pro-choice demonstration in 2014. (Photo: Zhu/Flickr/cc)
'A Very Scary Case': Placing Rights of Woman Last, Alabama Judge Allows Boyfriend to Sue Abortion Clinic With Fetus as Co-Plaintiff
"When the fetus becomes a person as per Alabama 'personhood law,' a woman is rendered a walking incubator with less rights than a fetus and the man."
Mar 04, 2019
An Alabama county court recognized an aborted fetus as a plaintiff in a lawsuit Tuesday, opening a new chapter in the fight for reproductive rights in the United States.
Madison County probate court Judge Frank Barger allowed Ryan Magers to name the fetus his girlfriend had aborted as a co-plaintiff in his case against Alabama Women's Center.
The judge's decision to establish an estate for the fetus, allowing the suit to move forward, came four months after the passage of Amendment 2 by voters in a state referendum last November. The law, which passed by 18 percentage points, gives fetuses the same legal rights held by a person under the state constitution.
Women's rights advocates on social media slammed the decision, noting that it was perhaps the first time in U.S. history a fetus was named as a co-plaintiff in a case.
As NARAL Pro-Choice America President Ilyse Hogue wrote on social media, the "very scary case" asserts that a "woman's rights [are] third in line," after those of a man who impregnates her and the fetus she aborts.
Author Mona Eltahawy added that the case effectively renders the woman--and all women in Alabama--"walking incubators" with fewer rights than a fetus.
According to WAAY 31, a local ABC affiliate, Magers' girlfriend obtained an abortion two years ago when she was just six weeks pregnant.
"Pregnant people are full citizens with bodily autonomy and a right to choose the outcome of their pregnancy," wrote Dr. Katie McHugh, a fellow with Physicians for Reproductive Rights. "Attempting to grant a six week gestational sac equal rights is both unlawful and idiotic."
The Alabama Women's Center has until April 1 to respond to the suit. Magers' attorney told WAAY 31 he believes the case could eventually proceed to the state Supreme Court.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
An Alabama county court recognized an aborted fetus as a plaintiff in a lawsuit Tuesday, opening a new chapter in the fight for reproductive rights in the United States.
Madison County probate court Judge Frank Barger allowed Ryan Magers to name the fetus his girlfriend had aborted as a co-plaintiff in his case against Alabama Women's Center.
The judge's decision to establish an estate for the fetus, allowing the suit to move forward, came four months after the passage of Amendment 2 by voters in a state referendum last November. The law, which passed by 18 percentage points, gives fetuses the same legal rights held by a person under the state constitution.
Women's rights advocates on social media slammed the decision, noting that it was perhaps the first time in U.S. history a fetus was named as a co-plaintiff in a case.
As NARAL Pro-Choice America President Ilyse Hogue wrote on social media, the "very scary case" asserts that a "woman's rights [are] third in line," after those of a man who impregnates her and the fetus she aborts.
Author Mona Eltahawy added that the case effectively renders the woman--and all women in Alabama--"walking incubators" with fewer rights than a fetus.
According to WAAY 31, a local ABC affiliate, Magers' girlfriend obtained an abortion two years ago when she was just six weeks pregnant.
"Pregnant people are full citizens with bodily autonomy and a right to choose the outcome of their pregnancy," wrote Dr. Katie McHugh, a fellow with Physicians for Reproductive Rights. "Attempting to grant a six week gestational sac equal rights is both unlawful and idiotic."
The Alabama Women's Center has until April 1 to respond to the suit. Magers' attorney told WAAY 31 he believes the case could eventually proceed to the state Supreme Court.
An Alabama county court recognized an aborted fetus as a plaintiff in a lawsuit Tuesday, opening a new chapter in the fight for reproductive rights in the United States.
Madison County probate court Judge Frank Barger allowed Ryan Magers to name the fetus his girlfriend had aborted as a co-plaintiff in his case against Alabama Women's Center.
The judge's decision to establish an estate for the fetus, allowing the suit to move forward, came four months after the passage of Amendment 2 by voters in a state referendum last November. The law, which passed by 18 percentage points, gives fetuses the same legal rights held by a person under the state constitution.
Women's rights advocates on social media slammed the decision, noting that it was perhaps the first time in U.S. history a fetus was named as a co-plaintiff in a case.
As NARAL Pro-Choice America President Ilyse Hogue wrote on social media, the "very scary case" asserts that a "woman's rights [are] third in line," after those of a man who impregnates her and the fetus she aborts.
Author Mona Eltahawy added that the case effectively renders the woman--and all women in Alabama--"walking incubators" with fewer rights than a fetus.
According to WAAY 31, a local ABC affiliate, Magers' girlfriend obtained an abortion two years ago when she was just six weeks pregnant.
"Pregnant people are full citizens with bodily autonomy and a right to choose the outcome of their pregnancy," wrote Dr. Katie McHugh, a fellow with Physicians for Reproductive Rights. "Attempting to grant a six week gestational sac equal rights is both unlawful and idiotic."
The Alabama Women's Center has until April 1 to respond to the suit. Magers' attorney told WAAY 31 he believes the case could eventually proceed to the state Supreme Court.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.